Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WELDON REJECTS 9/11 COMMISSION CLAIM THEY NEVER HEARD OF "ABLE DANGER"
email from Weldon's office | 8-10-05 | Weldon office

Posted on 08/11/2005 7:29:46 AM PDT by doug from upland

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: Sunshine Sister

Liberals have been all a-twitter lately...expecting that some kind of indictment against Bush/Cheney/Rove was in the works. What if, they are partially right...what if there ARE high profile indictments coming down...only not for anyone in the President's Administration.

*LOL*

We all know how everytime the Libs get riled up they wind up with a rather embarassing amount of egg on their face. I would expect something along these line again...and maybe, just maybe...this story about Able Danger is the egg containing the goo that will soon be all over the Libs yet again. Jamie Gorelick, in particular, has to be concerned. It was her memo that clearly allowed the intelligence failure to occur.

I'm looking forward to this. Expect the Libs to go into hyper-attack mode to try and cover up the issue...we need to make every effort we can, through every outlet we can...to let as many folks know as possible...that 09/11/2001 had many reasons for occurring...but chief among them was the utter failure of the Clinton Administration to handle the obvious threat we faced from terrorism


41 posted on 08/11/2005 7:59:09 AM PDT by GLH3IL (What's good for America is bad for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Absolutely.

But who on our side let her get there? That's what's bugging me.


42 posted on 08/11/2005 7:59:13 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

"This guy Weldon is really OK."

He's a good rep, but he can go off the deep end occasionally. Didn't he also claim that Tehran is hiding Osama bin Laden? I'm not saying this 9/11 stuff isn't true, but I want to hear it from another source before I put too much stock in it.


43 posted on 08/11/2005 7:59:46 AM PDT by bigmac0707
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I'm glad to see this is gaining some traction although I'm extremely pessimistic that the Clinton administration will ever be held accountable for any of the criminal/treasonous actions. Copied and emailed this one to a few friends.
44 posted on 08/11/2005 8:00:17 AM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead

There was a heirarchy that allowed only two people could see the data. THEY decided who else got to see the data.......one of those two was JAMIE GORELICK.


45 posted on 08/11/2005 8:01:49 AM PDT by OldFriend (MERCY TO THE GUILTY IS CRUELTY TO THE INNOCENT ~ Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Richard Ben-Vinesta, perhaps?


46 posted on 08/11/2005 8:04:19 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Conservatives look at Iraqi dual use chemicals and see WMDs. Liberals see tomato gardens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Do you have a link for that? If true, that's hugely damning. And it wouldn't surprise me at all. She should never have been placed on that Commission because of the conflict.


47 posted on 08/11/2005 8:04:28 AM PDT by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842
The President was against this commission from the start....and with good reason. Too bad the media made it impossible to keep saying NO.

All I can say is.....Heaven help the USA.

48 posted on 08/11/2005 8:06:04 AM PDT by OldFriend (MERCY TO THE GUILTY IS CRUELTY TO THE INNOCENT ~ Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Ah Richard Ben Venista. His name continues to show up where their is disgraceful if not treasonous Democrate actions to cover up. I wonder what he is up to these days. For people like that, it is usually helpful to know their whereabouts. Inevitably it seems they are up to no good.


49 posted on 08/11/2005 8:06:47 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GLH3IL

I sure hope you are right about getting this out in the general public. I'm not holding my breath however. 50+ years of experience tells me not to hold my breath!


50 posted on 08/11/2005 8:08:39 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: GianniV
Hey Karen... Karen... 'yo Karen...

KAREN BREITWEISER... wake-the-fu_k up!!!!

51 posted on 08/11/2005 8:08:58 AM PDT by johnny7 (Racially-profiling since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GianniV

Why would anyone email anything significant to anybody?

#1. The law firm probably has a filter that keeps your email from getting through.

#2. Your email will get lost in a pile of spam.

Face it, the internet is the worst possible way of communicating with anyone.

Either write, fax or better yet, phone. They have to answer the phone and a significant number of calls will get their attention.


52 posted on 08/11/2005 8:12:05 AM PDT by norge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

My apologies to Karen Breitweiser... it's 'Kristen'.


53 posted on 08/11/2005 8:12:09 AM PDT by johnny7 (Racially-profiling since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: All

NOTE TO ALL: on any articles about this subject, add the keyword "Atta"...... that will make it come up easy in the search engine....the Admin Moderator created that category


54 posted on 08/11/2005 8:14:09 AM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming -- INDICTING HILLARY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
The President was against the Commission because there had already been a Senate Intelligence(I think) Commission. The findings were published on the web at one time....including suggestions for the future.

President Bush nailed the new commission for what it was...a "sanitize" Bubba campaign for Hillary.

I kept thinking that Bubba ordered Berger "to the archives"....but I'm leaning more and more to "Hillary Ordered Berger"....to the archives...or "off with your head".

Berger's reward was "Kerry Advisor".......and then came the "off with your head" bit. Voila...Berger awaits sentencing.

55 posted on 08/11/2005 8:17:33 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Landru

Hello old friend . . .

I just wanted to make sure you didn't miss this thread, or the thread linked in the referenced post.

I'm sure Jamie "eyebrows" Gorelick doesn't expect a Spanish Inquisition.


56 posted on 08/11/2005 8:18:12 AM PDT by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; All
) What lawyers in the Department of Defense made the decision in late 2000 not to pass the information from Able Danger to the FBI?

There are a number of aspects of this story that are troubling me.

Why were lawyers at DOD making this decision? Shouldn't they have handed off any DOMESTIC information to the FBI? Shouldn't it have been up to the FBI what to do with this information?

What was DOD doing running a DOMESTIC Intelligence Operation? Remember this is PRE 9-11. I could see something like Able Danger now but find it really hard to believe the same Administration that put up "the wall" was going to authorize DOD to do Able Danger.
57 posted on 08/11/2005 8:20:43 AM PDT by MNJohnnie ( Brick by brick, stone by stone, the Revolution grows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
"So maybe you nail them for bad management in delegating too much responsibility to staffers"

There is an obvious question here: Who were these staffers, high ranking secretaries, attorneys?

58 posted on 08/11/2005 8:20:57 AM PDT by AGreatPer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Maybe FReepers are the ones who should camp in front of Gorelick's and demand answers.

Hey, it's working for Cindy Sheehan!

59 posted on 08/11/2005 8:28:37 AM PDT by Mygirlsmom (This Mess is a Place!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
President Clinton had the DOD spying on American Citizens.
60 posted on 08/11/2005 8:29:01 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Conservatives look at Iraqi dual use chemicals and see WMDs. Liberals see tomato gardens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson