Posted on 08/10/2005 10:38:54 AM PDT by marshmallow
CLEARWATER - Michael Schiavo has asked a court to waive the two-year statute of limitations on filing a medical malpractice lawsuit against one or more of his deceased wife's caregivers.
Terri Schiavo, 41, died March 31 after her feeding tube was removed after a seven-year court battle.
Schiavo's attorney in this case, Mark Perenich, said he was not able to discuss the proposed lawsuit behind Tuesday's request for an extension of the two-year statute of limitations.
By law, medical malpractice lawsuits must be filed within two years of the alleged misconduct unless an extension is granted.
In October 2003, Terri Schiavo's feeding tube was removed on court order. Doctors reinserted it on orders from Gov. Jeb Bush.
If you would let God use you once in a while, you'd begin to understand Who's really using who.
"I'm speechless."
Other things not to say in Florida:
"I've been on my feet all afternoon and I'M READY TO COLLAPSE."
"I took one look at you, that's all I meant to do, and then MY HEART STOOD STILL."
"My throat is so sore I CAN HARDLY SWALLOW."
"My heart beats so that I CAN HARDLY SPEAK, when we're out together dancing cheek to cheek."
"California grows so much produce, you'd think you're IN A PACIFIC VEGETABLE STATE."
"I used to work in a television store but I HATE TO LIVE WITH ALL THOSE TUBES."
"I'm going to have surgery tomorrow, and until then, the doctor says DON'T GIVE ME ANY WATER OR FOOD."
(thanks t'wit).
check out the list above. WHAT NOT TO SAY IN FLORIDA.
Who accused you of murdering your father? If you're referring to your false allegations against me a while back, you were wrong to make up such a thing about me. Did you make up the same thing about anyone else? Did anyone actually accuse you of murdering your father?
I am awaiting the pardoning of the turkey at the White House this Thanksgiving. Lucky turkey.
I know. But but how does one twist a med mal suit into a libel suit? That is not to say that MS won't file a libel suit, as well, but this med mal suit is an entirely different animal.
| Uniform Case | Pinellas Case | Section | Case Type | Type |
| 522005CA005436XXCICI | 05005436CI | HNO | MED MAL PRAC EXT | PM |
| Style: | SCHIAVO MICHAEL PR | |||
| vs. | IN RE | |||
| Jury Trial | STIP | NOTH | Reason | Type Disp. |
| Filling Date | Appeal Date | Judg. Date | Reop Date | Docket Date |
| 08/09/05 | ||||
| Case/Cat | ||||
| PROFESSIONAL MALPRAC | ||||
| 4 Docket Entries, 08/10/05 to 08/09/05 |
| Pages | Date | P/D | Docket Entry | Ver |
| 08/10/05 | CLERK | REQUEST FOR COPIES - FAXED COPIES/081205 | N | |
| 08/09/05 | PLAINTIFF | CIRCUIT CIVIL FILING FEE PAID $ $37.50 | N | |
| 08/09/05 | PLAINTIFF | PETITION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME | F | |
| 08/09/05 | PLAINTIFF | THIS CASE ASSIGNED BY CLERK TO SECTION HNO BY 0040 - HOLD PM | N |
No, I don't dislike you. You're intelligent and I find much of what you do to be fair and honorable. I disagree rather stridently with you on matters involving the Catholic Church, and that leads me to be rather abrupt (to put it mildly) in those threads. That's all.
:)
Michael Schiavo is the worst.....you would think he would let this go since he got his wish.
Been very busy lately.....will try to catch up on FRmail this weekend for those who have mailed me. Yes, I am still around, just busy with summer, school getting ready to start, etc.....Freepers are still the best!
Yes, somebody did. I didn't say it was you.
Are you implying that God's Nemesis [the devil] is using Hildy?
No wonder the Schindlers' lost over and over again. Their most vocal supporters seemed to enjoy nasty, unChristian, personal attacks.
It's not very Christian of you to put words in my mouth. Maybe you need to work on that.
Are you implying that God's Nemesis [the devil] is using Hildy?Who is using Hildy on this issue?
What did you mean when you wrote: "If you would let God use you once in a while, you'd begin to understand Who's really using who"?
hildy, from my posts, ALL TAKEN FROM THE LINK PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED for Pinellas Records Civil/Small Claims - Name Lookup (see link in post #62), #347, #62, and #73, (which is why, in part, I asked you, hildy, by post #115 if you can READ (and which question you chose not to answer but, instead, continue on with your *%$&@ insistence that this is a libel suit)....
SCHIAVO MICHAEL PR [meaning, Personal Representative] vs. IN RENote: LIBEL has nothing to do with MEDICAL MALPRACTICE. And, conversely, if MS should file a libel suit, that would not be a medical malpractice suit. Do you understand the law at all, hildy? How many more times must it be in black and white that this is a PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL MALPRACTICE suit before you 1) believe it's not a libel suit, and 2) apologize for insisting it's a libel suit?
Pinellas Case No.: 05005436CI
Case/Cat : PROFESSIONAL MALPRACDescription of Professional Malpractice, as concerns health care providers:
Doctors, Hospitals, and Other Healthcare Providers
- Medical malpractice has been defined as the unskillful practice of medicine resulting in injury to a patient. It comprises all acts and omissions of a healthcare professional toward a patient that may make the professional either civilly or criminally liable, and may consist of a single act or a course of treatment.
Medical malpractice actions are generally brought under a theory of negligence, which may include a failure to properly diagnose a medical condition and/or negligent failure to disclose the existence of a condition. In addition, an action for medical malpractice may be based upon misrepresentation, breach of contract to cure, breach of physician-patient confidentiality, or assault and battery.
In general, all medical malpractice actions are governed by the Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act of Texas, which provides, among other things, the following advantages for a healthcare provider in defending a claim by a patient:...
Why don't you try reading the post I was replying to when I said that? If that doesn't clear it up, I'll see if I can lower my IQ enough to explain it to you.
I missed that thread. I certainly did not mean to suggest that any one poster had a monopoly in posting content that I from time to time find unfortunate. In fact, some of what I post I find unfortunate from time to time in hindsight. Such is life.
Good to see you.
I asked you a question:
Are you implying that God's Nemesis [the devil] is using Hildy?Who is using Hildy on this issue?
What did you mean when you wrote: "If you would let God use you once in a while, you'd begin to understand Who's really using who"?
perfectly understandable to me what that means. It's one thing, however, to understand, it's quite another to allow....and that's the area with which most people have problems and struggle.
Hildy said: I love how you guys use God to suit your fancy.
I took that to mean that we are using God.
I replied: If you would let God use you once in a while, you'd begin to understand Who's really using who.
I don't know what your custom is, but I do not capitalize pronouns that refer to Satan. In other words, God is Who's using us.
Do you understand now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.