NYP: 'POST-IT' BLUNDER - Spies forced to 'cover up' Atta

New York Post ^ | August 10, 2005 | IAN BISHOP

[JustAnotherOkie]

How about 'Deported August 13, 2005'

[w1andsodidwe]

QUESTION: Why didn't the 9-11 Commission address this "revelation"...I saw no such mention of "Abel-Baker" in the report?

Weldon was on Fox and friends this morning. He said that the Commission staff interview members of the "Abel-Baker" team, and that several members offered to tesify further. The commission staff never informed their bosses about this. Still being investigated as to why the staff hid it.

Pushing for Congressional investigation.

I think this smells very much like a Clinton cover up operation

[TomGuy]

Gorelick and Benvenista weren't on the 9-11 Commission by accident. They were appointed for one specific purpose -- to protect Clinton. And Sandy Bergler's pants-full of documents were additional insurance to protect Clinton.

The Clinton Legacy continues.

[InvisibleChurch]

what did shrillary know and when did she ignore it?

[G.Mason]

"QUESTION: Why didn't the 9-11 Commission address this "revelation"..."

Because the 9-11 Commission was made up predominately of enemies of this Republic.

[hershey]

Gorelick and Berger, Clinton's thugs. Amazing. Now Sandy's got his own think tank, a perpetual propaganda machine with multo $$$$ benefits. (Jamie?)Gorelick is probably similarly well off, and Hill plans to run for President on Bill's 'record'. Naturally the record must remain sacrosanct, otherwise Hill has nothing to run on but her own wretchedness.

[conservativecorner]

Northeast Intel Report and Neal Boortz. NIR is the article that really connects the dots in this "Sandygate"/Able Danger link. The rat's will do anything in order to hide the truth.

[G.Mason]

Earlier article for those following this ... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1460263/posts

[conservativecorner]

I hate to use a frog word but TOUCHE'!!

[Sacajaweau]

If this is true...Surely, Clark would would have been passed this to Bush in his "warning to Bush about terrorists" which he noted at the hearings.

It was very obvious that information at the 9-11 hearings were "selective" and controlled by the Dems. Condi's interview was just so obvious, it was disgusting. How dare he "TRY" to cut her off in the middle of a dissertaion which would leave the record tainted with what they "wanted to hear" and not the whole truth.

[the invisib1e hand]

those two pictures, sadly, tell it all. I hope some artist picks up on it and puts them together somehow.

[InvisibleChurch]

It probably won't happen but I want to say it, "Put a post-it on Hillary saying Goodbye 2008.

[r9etb]

Still being investigated as to why the staff hid it.

I mean, hell -- this is HUGE stuff, and the staffers never passed it on? One would almost think that there was a partisan tinge to these particular staffers, wouldn't you?

You're right: cover-up is the best bet.

[InvisibleChurch]

I won't be surprised if the left comes back and says, "Well, if it was so important, they should have broken the law and gone ahead and shared the information."

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Correct. Gorelick did her job and was well paid by the Clintons.

[tom paine 2]

That sticker would read guilty of treason

[afnamvet]

Does anyone believe there will be congressional hearings on this?

[andyandval]

The rat's will do anything in order to hide the truth.

Surely they will.

Thanks for the resource.

[A message]

A disturbing collage, one that should be regularly posted as Her Heinous gears up her run.

[TomGuy]

Does anyone believe there will be congressional hearings on this?

Sure. 50 years after the death of the last person directly involved.

But it won't happen in our lifetime.