Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Relieves General of His Command
Army Web Site | Aug 8, 05 | Army Web Page

Posted on 08/09/2005 7:41:36 AM PDT by SLB

Below is the release put on the Army website last night…..
Army Relieves General of His Command
August 8, 2005

On Aug. 8, the Chief of Staff of the Army directed the relief of Gen. Kevin P. Byrnes from his position as Commanding General, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command. The investigation upon which this relief is based is undergoing further review to determine the appropriate final disposition of this matter.

As the investigation into this is continuing, please discourage speculation from your Soldiers. LTG Jones will be the acting commander until LTG Wallace is confirmed as the new TRADOC commander.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: army; byrnes; dod; tradoc; ucmj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-191 next last
To: El Gato
Social Functions such as? Or are you just objecting to "Under God" in the pledge or a prayer at a social function.

Aside from prayer at all functions, there are prayer breakfasts and various social events surrounding Christian holidays, not including Christmas and Easter. For example, there are the formal dinings-in for St. Barbara (patron saint of artillery -- better be there if you're an artillery officer) and events planned for the Passion. There were a few more surrounding some other Catholic traditions, but I can't remember specifics. I just know they happened often because I was the one who arranged them.

101 posted on 08/09/2005 12:23:19 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
I can almost guarantee it has nothing to do with his official duties.

You're probably right. If I get the story straight, he was due for replacement soon anyway, so a performance-related firing wouldn't make much sense.

102 posted on 08/09/2005 12:25:57 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

You are right --- "personal."

Gay? Was he flat-out discharged or merely removed from command to sit at a desk until retirement?


103 posted on 08/09/2005 12:25:57 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

"Gay?"

Highly doubtful. A wife and a couple of kids which could be a front, but that's an hard secret to keep for 50+ years esp when you start moving up into the 4 star command/political levels.


104 posted on 08/09/2005 12:27:31 PM PDT by tfecw (Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: bayourod

Maybe some kind soul will explain to you the difference in character/goals between a Pusher and a Soldier.


105 posted on 08/09/2005 12:29:53 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: GodfearingTexan

As you were.


106 posted on 08/09/2005 12:45:35 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Lonesome's First Law: Whenever anyone says it's not about the money, it's about the money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: sasafras
He probably said he believes there is a God or claimed to be a CHRISTIAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There is no room in our military for people of faith - damn it if they want to go out and defend our country and put their life on the line then they should ultimate faith in themselves and liberal ideology. (sarcasm alert)

Ummmmmmmmm, no. There was a far higher percentage of Christians in the military (or at least in the infantry units I was in) than on the outside.

107 posted on 08/09/2005 12:52:28 PM PDT by Terabitten (Life, liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lil'freeper

Ping


108 posted on 08/09/2005 12:56:13 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." Pope JPII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Having been in the Army and spending a lot of time around officer land. Many of the Army's social functions are religious in nature, and officers are pretty much required to be involved in these social functions. Being an atheist in such a case can be awkward.

The armor battalion at FT. Lewis, in '76 or '77, had a dining in. I wasn't there, but there was nothing religious about it, unless you consider strippers, one captain having intercourse with a stripper in the kitchen and another captain performing oral sex on another stripper in front of the rest of the battalion officers to be 'religious'.

The O'Club manager called the MP's and someone called the 9th Div commander, MG Cavasos, who showed up in his PJs and put and end to the 'festivities'.

The battalion commander was relieved he next day as were the two captains. The CPTs got article 15 punishment and the LTC basically kissed his career goodbye.

109 posted on 08/09/2005 1:02:10 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
FWIW, I never even heard of any religious social functions when I was an Air Force officer.

Things must be very different in the Air Force. There were all sorts of things - prayer breakfasts, chapel services, etc., that were maybe not "mandatory" but were "highly encouraged."

110 posted on 08/09/2005 1:04:13 PM PDT by Terabitten (Life, liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
there are the formal dinings-in for St. Barbara (patron saint of artillery -- better be there if you're an artillery officer)

The Infantry has St. Maurice. Same story - you'd better be there if you're an infantry officer.

111 posted on 08/09/2005 1:05:50 PM PDT by Terabitten (Life, liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: SLB; All

Ya know, there is an aspect of this story that has not been mentioned on the thread, as far as I can tell. That is, how and where was the General relieved? Was he brought to Washington and then relieved? Did the CofS or Vice CofS travel to Hampton Roads? Was his office sealed?

It will all come out and it will be dramatic, I suspect.


112 posted on 08/09/2005 1:08:54 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
It will all come out and it will be dramatic, I suspect.

I agree with you there. 4 stars don't get relieved - they get retired quietly. Unless, of course, there is something really dramatic going on.

Even sexual misconduct, as long as it's not really bizarre (think live boy or dead woman) isn't generally enough to relieve a 4-star. They are generally told to resign before it gets to that point, in order to save the service (not the officer) from the disgrace of relieving them.

There's a HECK of a lot more going on here than meets the eye.

113 posted on 08/09/2005 1:19:23 PM PDT by Terabitten (Life, liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten
Even sexual misconduct, as long as it's not really bizarre (think live boy or dead woman) isn't generally enough to relieve a 4-star.

It is enough.

114 posted on 08/09/2005 1:23:45 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: tfecw
I just noticed this from the WaPo article:

Other officials said the matter was investigated by the Defense Department Inspector General and the findings were now being considered by senior Army officials to determine whether further action should be taken.

That seems a bit unusual to me, that the IG should be investigating him. Makes me wonder if the "personal misconduct" was waste/fraud/abuse type stuff rather than sexual misconduct. I dunno.

115 posted on 08/09/2005 1:26:04 PM PDT by Terabitten (Life, liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

Enough for a relief of command when the guy is already just a few months away from retirement? Not likely.

There are always exceptions - was the guy taking "vacations" to Thailand to sample young boys? Was he messing around with an enlisted soldier, or worse yet, and enlisted man's wife? Those sorts of things might lead to a relief for cause.

Generally speaking, though, if a general officer is getting some on the side, he gets a visit from another general officer and gets told to retire quietly for the good of the service. It's not absolute, iron clad, 100%, but I think that's a pretty safe rule, especially with an officer this close to retirement.


116 posted on 08/09/2005 1:30:01 PM PDT by Terabitten (Life, liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Right on the money about Wesley Clark. Yet, Fox News hires him as a "Contributor". When I see him on, I click to another channel. And when he pops up on my screen in the same space as Brit Hume, I almost gag.


117 posted on 08/09/2005 1:30:22 PM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
What's the point of being rich, famous, or powerful if you can't get any?

You don't join the Army, even as an officer, to get rich, famous, or powerful. You certainly don't join the army to get laid.

118 posted on 08/09/2005 1:31:21 PM PDT by Terabitten (Life, liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

Yup. You can be certain that the Pentagon reporters will shaking all the branches of the tree, today and this evening, in an attempt to get the story for the morning papers. Too many people know the story and someone will talk. This is as big as Singlaub or Edwin A. Walker, and they were both just two stars.


119 posted on 08/09/2005 1:32:51 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: SLB
This makes it that much harder for Basic Trainees when they get drilled on their chain of command. "Drill Sergeant, the Commander of TRADOC today is...."
120 posted on 08/09/2005 1:34:40 PM PDT by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson