Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Town Sued Over Accident That Sent SUV Into River (Suing rescuers)
WTNH News Channel 8 ^ | Aug. 5, 2005 | Tina Detel

Posted on 08/08/2005 5:58:11 PM PDT by raybbr

(Old Saybrook, Connecticut-WTNH, Aug. 5, 2005 5:53 PM< _ A woman saved from a submerged car in the Connecticut River is now suing the town which rescued her. An attorney for Barbara Connors says his client suffered permanent brain damage because Old Saybrook did not have the right equipment to save her quick enough.

The lawsuit has surprised many in town who say the efforts of those rescuers saved this woman's life. This suit though targets the town, saying this accident could have been prevented and the rescue could have been quicker.Last October, First Selectman Mike Pace honored those who rescued 76-year-old Barbara Connors and her son-in-law after his Ford Explorer plunged into the mouth of the Connecticut River. Today Pace finds himself defending those same rescuers from a lawsuit.

"It seems like a penalty for doing what was right, quick, and just."

Connors' attorney Robert Reardon says it took rescuers twenty-nine minutes to pull her from the submerged SUV. And he says if a dive team were in place things would be different.

(Excerpt) Read more at newschannel8.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: goodsamaritanpays
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: calex59
Well, she is right about one thing. The accident could have been prevented all right. The idiot driving could have driven slower and safer!

According to the full article, she's suing him too!

"Connors is also suing her son-in-law, Alan Hauser, who said he hit the accelerator instead of the brake causing the Explorer to crash through the fence and into the river."

21 posted on 08/08/2005 6:27:42 PM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal; general_re; aculeus; hellinahandcart; Tijeras_Slim; Larry Lucido; Petronski; ...
Hmmm, he's driving an SUV with this sweet, charming mother-in-law, and accidentally depresses the accelerator such that the vehicle plunges into a river. There could be more to this story which may go a long way in explaining his sudden loss of control.

.
“Come now, you’ve never read an actuarial table in your life, have you? ... Of all the cases on record, there’s not one single case of a sweet, charming mother-in-law, accidentally drowned in an SUV.”

22 posted on 08/08/2005 6:28:40 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; Thinkin' Gal
I hadn't noticed she was suing him also.

She's probably suing his insurance company for the medical bills. That's the way you have to do it around here.

23 posted on 08/08/2005 6:29:41 PM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: raybbr; Dead Corpse; Do not dub me shapka broham

"Mother-in-Law goes in the drink in new vehicle..."

Son-in-Law must be having "mixed emotions."

Can she also sue for now being ethically challenged, as well as brain-damaged? Or could that possibly be a condition that existed before the accident?


24 posted on 08/08/2005 6:29:56 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (Mighty and enduring? They are but toys of the moment to be overturned by the flicking of a finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hexenhammer

Great Idea!


25 posted on 08/08/2005 6:30:02 PM PDT by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Connors' attorney Robert Reardon says... if a dive team were in place things would be different.

So all towns near a river should have a dive team in place, 24/7, waiting for some idiot to drive into the river?

26 posted on 08/08/2005 6:38:31 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Koran 9:123 "Make war on the infidels who dwell around you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
Hmmm, he's driving an SUV with this sweet, charming mother-in-law, and accidentally depresses the accelerator such that the vehicle plunges into a river.

Figuring he could swim better than the old battle-ax?

27 posted on 08/08/2005 6:39:25 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Crush! Kill! Destroy the heathen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dighton
“Come now, you’ve never read an actuarial table in your life, have you? ... Of all the cases on record, there’s not one single case of a sweet, charming mother-in-law, accidentally drowned in an SUV.”

Well that's because they didn't have SUV's in 1944. :-)

If the MIL is this ornery after the accident, what was she like before? Is her present personality an improvement? The article says she is in a nursing home. The manufacturers of Bingo games had better lawyer up.

28 posted on 08/08/2005 6:41:39 PM PDT by Thinkin' Gal (Wisely investing in quality tin foil wardrobe basics since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Some folks are never grateful. From an article in Newsday about the Air France crash (that everyone walked away from, miraculously): "Some passengers criticized the 12-member crew, saying the flight attendants were not responsive enough."
29 posted on 08/08/2005 6:42:35 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Put the old bitch back in the river then.


30 posted on 08/08/2005 6:55:22 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
Some people have never ever had to come to grips with life in a world constrained by economic choice. Normally we call them children. Upon reaching adulthood, those still harboring such childish fantasies may safely be called morons.

Thank you! This is the best paragraph I've read in quite awhile. I plan to plegarize it heavily. I will attempt to give you credit whenever my ego allows!

31 posted on 08/08/2005 7:03:42 PM PDT by Egon (By the way, I took the liberty of fertilizing your caviar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

B-word.


32 posted on 08/08/2005 7:11:19 PM PDT by bboop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Many states have shield or "Good Samaritan" laws that protect responders from this kind of felony ingratitude. It would appear that Connecticut does not, more's the pity.

I guess my defense would be that while the woman may be brain damaged following the rescue, she would be brain DEAD if the rescue hadn't taken place.

Of course, that would require a re-enactment to substantiate the theory ...

33 posted on 08/08/2005 7:16:42 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Well let me be the first: I have read the first 33 replies and nary a mention yet:

Was Teddy the driver?


34 posted on 08/08/2005 7:19:43 PM PDT by ZOTnot ('We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good'--Hillary, 6/28/2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
Some people have never ever had to come to grips with life in a world constrained by economic choice. Normally we call them children. Upon reaching adulthood, those still harboring such childish fantasies may safely be called morons.

Roger that!

35 posted on 08/08/2005 7:27:33 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Crush! Kill! Destroy the heathen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I live in a tiny town (1,500 + -) with a great Volunteer FD trained in swift water rescue. Our town is on a river that has astonishing 23 ft. rised during heavy rains, they've pulled out lots of folks over the years. Most of those people were in those raging waters because of their stupidity and lack of common-sense (by-passing a "bridge closed" barricade, for example).

I wholeheartedly agree with Post #4.


36 posted on 08/08/2005 7:55:19 PM PDT by brushcop (We lift up our military serving in harm's way and pray for total victory and a safe return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

mark


37 posted on 08/08/2005 8:57:16 PM PDT by UB355
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton; Thinkin' Gal; general_re; hellinahandcart; Tijeras_Slim; Larry Lucido; Petronski

Didn't we once have a legal profession consisting entirely of men and women who would have tossed this woman out of their offices?


38 posted on 08/09/2005 4:25:04 AM PDT by aculeus (Ceci n'est pas une tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

I would have (and have, in fact, on several occasions). That's why I still drive a Taurus rather than a Lexus.


39 posted on 08/09/2005 4:46:05 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dighton

Chuckle.


40 posted on 08/09/2005 5:01:07 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Lonesome's First Law: Whenever anyone says it's not about the money, it's about the money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson