Posted on 08/07/2005 10:09:16 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
But then how would they react to a dirty bomb?
It's sad to say, but with our current "open borders" policy, our enemy already has entered the US and await their tasking. My best guess it that it will be a simultaneous attack on multiple cities and targets. My best guess is that it will be closer to the 06 election in hopes that they can sway the electorate like they did in Spain. Of course, I want to be wrong in my prediction, but.........
not good enough, I want to hear about a list of countries that support muslim fanatics that will be held responsible (Syria,Iran)
So who leaked the "classified plans"?
Karl Rove.
A key word you seem to be ignoring is "classified".
How would you want them to react? Why do YOU want to know classified plans?
Is this just more second-guessing of our President and our administration by self-appointed experts seeking to "help" them do their jobs better?
So you want to know war plans in a time of war?
Why?
If there is a major attack or series of attacks on this country by the islamoscumsheetheads you can bet that I will not be the only one with one shot=one kill on anything with a turban on top of it plan.
bump
Maybe Pentagon released this on purpose to fool our enemies. Hard to say.
I hope it involves lots of bombs.
Didn't they do that on Sept 11 and shortly after? I would call things like the Combat Air Patrols and new rules of engagement for hijacked planes the "first-ever" war plans to deal with terror attacks in the US.
Journalists, sloppy use of language, bad memory, or both?
"The classified plans, ***developed here at*** Northern Command headquarters"
Was this written by some AT NorCom??!!
USNORTHCOM of course.
It's to make the public feel secure in knowing the government has plans in place.
>>
If there is a major attack or series of attacks on this country by the islamoscumsheetheads you can bet that I will not be the only one with one shot=one kill on anything with a turban on top of it plan.
<<
Just don't mess up and nail any Sikhs -- they are good guys.
And has diminishing returns. Ex:
US airliner is shot down over Kentucky by terrorists using missiles.
Government claims aircraft downed due to windshear in effort to sidestep effects of terror on public (primary goal of the terrorists).
Its what I would do, but one problem: when you go to ask congress for $$ to counter missile attacks, no one will be listening, especially the public, because they've been led to believe the threat is low.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.