Skip to comments.
'Three Stooges' Action Lands Boy in Court
Yahoo News & Mail Tribune ^
| August 8, 2005
Posted on 08/07/2005 9:58:33 PM PDT by lunarbicep
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
To: lunarbicep
"They're not friends," she said. "If he was my son's friend, it would be a different thing," said Bobby Cox.
Yet another case of moral relativism. It becomes less amusing every time it rears its ugly head.
21
posted on
08/07/2005 10:16:34 PM PDT
by
so_real
("The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: Archie Bunker on steroids
The judge's ruling is indicative of the heinous nature of the titty-twister. Unlike the double-finger eye poke, which can be neutralized by the counter-move of placing the hand vertically flush with the nose and perpendicular with the face, the titty-twister has no known countermove. Thus, a more stiffer sentence for its use is warranted.
22
posted on
08/07/2005 10:16:51 PM PDT
by
McBuff
To: Archie Bunker on steroids
The judge's ruling is indicative of the heinous nature of the titty-twister. Unlike the double-finger eye poke, which can be neutralized by the counter-move of placing the hand vertically flush with the nose and perpendicular with the face, the titty-twister has no known countermove. Thus, a more stiffer sentence for its use is warranted.
23
posted on
08/07/2005 10:17:32 PM PDT
by
McBuff
To: NonValueAdded
I hope the estate sues the author for slander. It could happen, since they're represented by the firm of . . .
To: McBuff
placing the hand vertically flush with the nose and perpendicular with the faceThis maneuver is known as 'Curly Protection' and was widely practiced by pre-teens and psychologically arrested pre-adults until the late 1980s when Ted Turner took the fun out of everything.
25
posted on
08/07/2005 10:25:22 PM PDT
by
IncPen
(There's nothing that a liberal can't improve using your money...)
To: Smokin' Joe
[What (at most) should have been a conversation between parents and children has become a nanny-state circus, complete with the entire entourage. How can children learn to sort their differences out like adults when the adults go running to the authorities over stuff this dumb?]
Unfortunately, this has now become necessary in many cases.
It used to be when one kid crossed the line in his behavior against other kids, a phone call to the offending kid's parents "fixed" the situation.
Now, there are many parents who refuse to believe ill of their priceless children and don't administer discipline on them as needed.
The result is either the victim's parents engaging in vigilantism against the offending minor because his own parents aren't taking care of the problem, or bringing the incident into the venue of law enforcement.
26
posted on
08/07/2005 10:26:29 PM PDT
by
spinestein
(The facts fairly and honestly presented, truth will take care of itself.)
To: vpintheak
The father is a prime example of feminized male....he felt so strongly about it he called the cops...but couldnt be bothered to call the kids parents...or heaven forbid actually have the balls to drive over and knock on the door...
The kid is going to grow up just like his wussie dad....
I'd had died of embarrasment if I spilled even half of what was normal taunting of other kids...One gets even...even if you get yer ass kicked...
Wonder how bad the kid will be taunted now?...his mommy and daddy had to call the cops over a titty twister?
Liberalism IS a mental disorder...and it's spreading...
27
posted on
08/07/2005 10:27:04 PM PDT
by
Crim
(I may be a Mr "know it all"....but I'm also a Mr "forgot most of it"...)
To: lunarbicep
Cox said she was surprised to hear that her husbands' call to Gold Hill police resulted in court time for the boy.
Christine Alford, David's mother, said she did not let her son attend the hearing because she had seen photos of teenagers in handcuffs on the county's Web site. This gal is a trouble making idiot from the get-go. She is a former Gold Hill city (Hah! City? Running joke, is more like it.) councilwoman, who has publicly stated she is a trouble maker, and proud of it.
I can't believe she didn't know the difference between showing up for a preliminary hearing, and being arrested.
I'm sorry her son has her for his mother; and sorry he has to pay extra for her stupidity. Still, I hope he learned to keep his hands to himself.
28
posted on
08/07/2005 10:28:58 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(The Marching Morons are coming...and they're breeding more Democrats beyond all reason!)
To: McBuff
[the titty-twister has no known countermove]
How about a poke in the snoot?
or a punch in the bread basket?
or a kick to the nads?
29
posted on
08/07/2005 10:29:49 PM PDT
by
spinestein
(The facts fairly and honestly presented, truth will take care of itself.)
To: spinestein
I hate to say it, but when we were kids, the "titty twister" was not even worth a mention to our folks; we gave as good as we got.
If we just keep making whining weenies out of our kids, then it will only take a generation or two for some other country to come in and take over by bruising egos and lowering self esteem with epithets over loudspeakers, turning the population into sniveling globs of spineless protoplasm.
Hell, they won't even have to load their rifles.
30
posted on
08/07/2005 10:35:27 PM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(God save us from the fury of the do-gooders!)
To: Smokin' Joe
I can't disagree with anything you said.
31
posted on
08/07/2005 10:38:06 PM PDT
by
spinestein
(The facts fairly and honestly presented, truth will take care of itself.)
To: lunarbicep
According to David, the two boys were in line at a local deli when Matthew jokingly made an embarrassing remark to the female clerk about David You know, JOKINGLY is usually found at the start of MOST law school questions in TORT..
32
posted on
08/07/2005 10:42:44 PM PDT
by
Experiment 6-2-6
(When the disbeliever sees this, he will say, 'How nice if I was also turned into sand.')
To: McBuff
Cover the nipples with the off-hand forearm. Grab the wrist of the offending (incoming) hand with the strong hand in an underhand grip on the wrist, twist the arm, preferably ending up holding the offender with their hand between their shoulder blades. It helps if the 'attacker' is left handed and you are right handed or vice versa. If not, use an overhanded grip on the wrist.
If that fails, attack back...
33
posted on
08/07/2005 10:42:47 PM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(God save us from the fury of the do-gooders!)
To: Experiment 6-2-6
Such as, Mr. Smith jokingly drove his car into Mrs. Jones.
34
posted on
08/07/2005 10:43:55 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: lunarbicep
Lawyers are getting in the way of our kids being kids.
35
posted on
08/07/2005 10:46:59 PM PDT
by
fella
(In law nothing is certain but the expense. - S. Butler)
To: fella
Lawyers are getting in the way of our kids being kids.more like parents running to lawyers thats getting in the way of our kids being kids
36
posted on
08/07/2005 11:03:27 PM PDT
by
lunarbicep
(Gratitude is not only the greatest of virtues, but the parent of all the others - Churchill)
To: lunarbicep
Hmm. I think I'm in the clear. What's the statute of limitations on a wedgie?
To: HitmanNY
What about 'Indian burns' and 'red bellies', and 'slugs' when you forget to holler 'safety!' after you burp?
38
posted on
08/08/2005 12:17:36 AM PDT
by
Armigerous
( Non permitte illegitimi te carborundum- "Don't let the bastards grind you down")
To: spinestein
I think an overhand, double slap of the "tittie twisting hands" hands would be my countermove........... The momentum would bring the hands full circle onto my own head, resulting in 2 coconut sound effects, but breaking the hold of the tittie twister.Opening offenses could be a simple eyepoke up to an advanced ear-box.
39
posted on
08/08/2005 3:49:40 AM PDT
by
singletrack
(..................................................................)
To: Armigerous
Sorry, "Indian burns" (we called them Indian rope burns) are out of the question now. Someone might be offended.
40
posted on
08/08/2005 3:59:22 AM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(It is Watergate yet? Is it Watergate yet?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson