Deportation not fair, says extremist (on benefits)

Associated Newspapers Ltd ^ | 6th August 2005

[ArmyTeach]

Two questions here. Do his wives(s) and children espouse his views? Does England need them?

[Publius6961]

He is registered disabled because of an injury to his leg during his childhood, and was recently supplied with a £31,000 Ford Galaxy under the Motability scheme.

Why was this ass***e even allowed into the country?

Did England sometime in the past put out a sign that said "MUG ME?"

[Publius6961]

Immigrants who come to America should be totally and permanently ineligible for welfare and affirmative action, As well as their immediate family.

[oldbrowser]

We should do the same. Criminals will get away with what we let them.

It is no wonder that they don't respect us.

We continue to support them while they continue to preach hate and violence against us.

We don't deserve respect.

[GoLightly]

Do his wives(s) and children espouse his views?

If they do & they foment it, they should be tossed out with him, but doing so would be a matter of doing it on their own actions. I tend to reject "sins of the father" & "thought crime" types of legislation. I like the way New Zealand's immigration laws work, as they force a certain amount of assimilation.

Does England need them?

Probably not, but the same would be true of almost everyone in England. It's one thing to ask that question before you allow someone in, but it's a different matter after you've already allowed them in.

[exnavychick]

• Deporting foreigners who foster hate, or advocate or justify violence.

•Throwing out those linked to extremist websites, groups, bookshops or centres.

• Banning foreign extremist preachers from Britain.

•Closing mosques and places of worship if used for 'fomenting extremism'.

•Outlawing worldwide the condoning or glorifying of terrorism.

• Refusing asylum to anyone linked to terrorism.

• Stripping citizenship from extremist naturalised Britons.

• Banning extremist Islamic groups Hizb ut Tahrir and Al-Muhajiroun.

____________________________________________________________

Sounds reasonable to me...wish we could manage something like that here without trampling all over the 1st Amendment.

*Sigh*

Hopefully, Mr. Blair will have some success in getting this done.

[Madame Dufarge]

it would be wrong to target a country in which they were living.

Weasel words.

[plainspeaker]

That Muslim cleric does not deserve anything more than the other foreigner that got shot in the head for running from the cops! Hard line, huh? Britain needs a death squad to hunt these bottom feeders down, and quietly remove them from the country. God, or is that Allah, we have gotten so soft. Did you know in the first Gulf War, we still don't know how many Iraqis died? Are they entitled to reparations? As to whether the country of his choice tortures or kills their filth is none of our business, and whatever they get, it is not enough. To murder innocents is likely the worst crime against humanity ever conceived. If this is their attempt to get our attention, we need to invite all these rats out of their holes, get them to come to a conference, and then guess what? May I participate?