Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Random listing of names on 9/11 memorial sparks pointed criticism
Newark Star Ledger ^ | 08.02.05 | Rudy Larini

Posted on 08/06/2005 5:47:16 PM PDT by Coleus

In the days after Sept. 11, 2001, Thomas Meehan remembers scouring the lists of those known dead and the lists of those who were missing for his daughter Colleen's name. 

Now that New Jersey is ready to memorialize its victims of the 9/11 attack, he said he doesn't want to have to try to find his daughter again. 

Meehan is among some two dozen families of 9/11 victims from New Jersey who have objected to the decision to list the names of the roughly 700 of their loved ones in random order on a memorial planned for Liberty State Park in Jersey City. 

"The last thing I want to have to do is visit a memorial where I again have to search for her name," said Meehan, 62, of Carteret. 

"Empty Sky," New York architect Frederic Schwartz's design for the New Jersey 9/11 memorial, was chosen from among 320 entries in a nationwide competition. 

Two stainless steel walls -- symbolizing the fallen Twin Towers -- set 16 feet apart will stretch 200 feet long and rise 30 feet high, forming a visual corridor focusing on the void where the World Trade Center once stood across the Hudson River. The name of each New Jersey resident who died will be engraved in nearly 4-inch-high lettering on the walls. 

In announcing the design last year, Schwartz said he chose to engrave the names randomly, rather than alphabetically or by any other category, such as by employer or civilian versus uniformed personnel.
.........

CONTINUED  1 | 2 | 3  Next

(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: 911families; 911memorial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Voices of 911 Petition Drive to Stop Random Names

voicesof911.com


1 posted on 08/06/2005 5:47:17 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Are there any long term memorial or site plans for the WTC site or nearby that aren't ilconceived?

It seems to me that special interests have taken over, and it's a screw what the families think, "I know what's best" mentality has taken over.

This is yet another disgusting non-repsonsive thumb in your eye act aimed squarely at the families. Any such concerns should have their permits revoked, unless it can be proven that the families are being unreasonable.

It is not unreasonable for the families to try to avoid the same problem they had finding their family member's name on a very important list, when visiting this memorial. It seems most cruel to ignore this.


2 posted on 08/06/2005 5:55:36 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"The last thing I want to have to do is visit a memorial where I again have to search for her name," said Meehan, 62, of Carteret.

That's right. Noboby else died but your daughter. Who wants to read those other people's stupid names.

Sheesh.

3 posted on 08/06/2005 5:56:58 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If we're The Religious Right, does that make them The Godless Left? Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"The nature of the tragedy itself was random," said committee chairman James Gray of Manalapan, whose son, 32-year-old Christopher, was killed in the Twin Towers.

"It was a random act," explained Aileen Ryan Burden, whose 45-year-old brother, John J. Ryan Jr., was killed on 9/11. "We just thought it was the fairest way to do it. We wanted everybody to be treated equally, with no hierarchy or title."

How stupid. Stupid or dishonest.

How bad off are we when the people planning a memorial feel infinite compassion toward the attackers and none toward the victims and their families (those who are unsophisticated enough to miss the grand point, I mean)?

4 posted on 08/06/2005 6:00:31 PM PDT by Generic_Login_1787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Generic_Login_1787
Random tragedy my ass..this was fully planned and executed to cause the maximum amount of innocent civilian death possible by the followers of islam..
5 posted on 08/06/2005 6:08:05 PM PDT by SouthernFreebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
We just thought it was the fairest way to do it. We wanted everybody to be treated equally, with no hierarchy or title."

I think it would be more politically correct if we just put an "x" representing each person. You know if some people have longer names then that is not fair. /sarc

6 posted on 08/06/2005 6:15:38 PM PDT by oldbrowser (Intelligent design is self evident)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Generic_Login_1787
"We just thought it was the fairest way to do it. We wanted everybody to be treated equally, with no hierarchy or title."

Alphabetizing names would make the memorial victims unequal? For who, Derek Zoolander, who's all the way at the end? Boo hoo!

Oh man. Political correctness has hit a new low. What a crock of shit. Who put these idiots in charge of such an important memorial?
7 posted on 08/06/2005 6:21:12 PM PDT by Zeon Cowboy (.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Image hosted by Photobucket.com yeah, i guess listing them by the floor they worked on and next to the people they died with was just toooo much to ask...
8 posted on 08/06/2005 6:21:51 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
I remember when the Vietnam War Memorial plans were announced. The outrage and furor over a memorial that was little more than a wall in a hole in the ground. And the families that were upset that they were not consulted about neither the design nor the decision to list the names by the year that they died.

Today it is one of the most visited memorials in the US. It is amazing how a few years can change our perspective, and how too often we can be too close to see the bigger picture.

9 posted on 08/06/2005 6:25:27 PM PDT by Between the Lines (Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
Why not just print out the 26 letters in the alphabet, and let the family members spell it out for themselves.
/for the sarcasm impaired


Kill A Commie For Mommie
Seven Dead Monkeys Page O Tunes

10 posted on 08/06/2005 6:27:26 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("If it's brown, drink it down. If it's black send it back." Homer's guide to drinking in Springfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist
Why not just print out the 26 letters in the alphabet, and let the family members spell it out for themselves.

LOL. Very good.

11 posted on 08/06/2005 6:31:40 PM PDT by oldbrowser (Intelligent design is self evident)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

These names are listed in order of the date of death. I never understood that before, and I thought it cruel to make it harder for people to find their loved ones.

Now I understand why. Two reasons. The first one was made clear to me when I recently visited the traveling wall in Fresno, and a veteran pointed out to me the half dozen men from his helicopter crew, all of whom were killed in a crash. Their names were listed together, because they all died together.

The 2nd reason is so that people get involved in the search. All you have to do is go to the reference and look up the name alphabetically, then go to the correct panel and line number, and presto, there's the name. But it makes you become involved. An alphabetic list would tend to cause someone to go...look...and walk away without becoming part of the "process" of the memorial. I remember the times I have greived for the loss of someone, and I ended up appreciating when the flow of events were setup in such a way to make me step out of my own thoughts and participate in a process in which everyone else is participating. Even if it's just simply the act of first having to look on an alphabetical list to show me where to go to find the person I'm looking for.

I guess I'm saying here that I like the idea of not listing the names alphabetically. I'm not sure that random is better than some other order that could be derived, such as the floor they worked on, or something else, but I think that at least random is better than pure alphabetical. I'd have to really think about it for a while to determine if I'd like something else better.

12 posted on 08/06/2005 6:49:43 PM PDT by MarineBrat (We are taxed twice as much by our idleness. -- Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Generic_Login_1787

"It was a random act," explained Aileen Ryan Burden, whose 45-year-old brother, John J. Ryan Jr., was killed on 9/11. "We just thought it was the fairest way to do it. We wanted everybody to be treated equally, with no hierarchy or title."

And you know, some people have ethnic names too. So we decided to rename everyone Sandy* Jones.

*Unisex name.


13 posted on 08/06/2005 8:56:37 PM PDT by blurb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MarineBrat
Their names were listed together, because they all died together. >>>

OK, that makes sense. But then again, most died on the same day at the same time. don't know any easy solution, it's become very PC.
14 posted on 08/07/2005 7:44:53 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Their names were listed together, because they all died together. >>>

OK, that makes sense. But then again, most died on the same day at the same time. don't know any easy solution, it's become very PC.

It's really a shame that these victim's families have to deal with this. When the Vietnam Memorial was created there had been more time for the pain to soften since the war, though honestly I don't recall at all if there was much ado about how to order the names. Now these WTC attack families are having to deal with this right in the middle of a war that was largely a direct result of the attacks. It's just tragic in every respect.

I guess that if they wanted to list the names by the floor and office number that they worked in that would be OK with me. So that just as with that helicopter crewman that I met at the VN Memorial who lost his whole crew, where he was able to see their names all in a row, someone who lost their co-workers at the WTC could see them all together on the wall.

I guess that no matter which way it goes, there's going to be lots of hand wringing about it. God Bless those people. I wish them peace and justice!

15 posted on 08/07/2005 8:26:13 PM PDT by MarineBrat (We are taxed twice as much by our idleness. -- Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

List them all or none of them.


16 posted on 08/07/2005 9:05:07 PM PDT by Liberty Valance ( Howdy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
Today it is one of the most visited memorials in the US. It is amazing how a few years can change our perspective, and how too often we can be too close to see the bigger picture.

You are correct .... and it's not in alphabetical order either.

17 posted on 08/07/2005 9:11:44 PM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon (I'm a Conservative but will not support evil just because it's "the law.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

What is it with this sudden compulsion to list the names of the victims on a memorial? I don't recall any monument before the Vietnam Memorial listing names. Have we become a nation of number freaks? "My memorial is better than your memorial because it has more names."

Let's just build a memorial that tells of whatever tragic event occured, perhaps mention the number of people who lost their lives, and leave it at that.


18 posted on 08/07/2005 9:15:39 PM PDT by billnaz (What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billnaz

i know, this thing with listing names is getting a bit out of hand.


19 posted on 08/07/2005 9:19:04 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Generic_Login_1787
How stupid. Stupid or dishonest. How bad off are we when the people planning a memorial feel infinite compassion toward the attackers and none toward the victims and their families (those who are unsophisticated enough to miss the grand point, I mean)?

Oh, my. I can hardly believe what I'm reading. Random act? All the planning and financing the terrorists undertook and the choice of targets and it's random?? And these are victims families feeling sorry for the criminals responsible. It was anything but random. Yikes. What a travesty. They are hardly 'honoring' the victims with this.

20 posted on 08/07/2005 9:22:37 PM PDT by fortunecookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson