Posted on 08/04/2005 9:17:13 PM PDT by Cautor
If Valerie Elise Plame Wilson was a top-notch covert spy, as the main stream media would have us believe, were all in real trouble. Spending even a couple of hours on the web demonstrates she was less than adept at hiding her deep cover as the following itemspieced together from searching the Internetindicate.
So what do we know about Ms. Plame? She was born April 19, 1963 in a military hospital in Anchorage Alaska to Samuel D. Plame, an Air Force Lieutenant Colonel, and Diane E. Plame her mother. She graduated from Lower Moreland High in Huntingdon Valley, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania in 1981 and headed off to Penn State University in State College, Pennsylvania where she received a BA in journalism in 1984. She later studied abroad at the London School of Economics and Political Science and the College of Europe, an international relations school in Bruges Belgium. It is possible she studied in Europe after she was recruited by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
According to a friend who knew her when she worked on the staff of the college newspaper, The Daily Collegian, Valerie visited State College [PA] a year or two after her graduation, and she spoke vaguely of her new occupation in Washington. The friend thought her visit was probably for a football game or some such. This suggests she was may still have been in the U.S. in the 1985-1986 timeframe.
Not much if anything is publicly known of Plames career during the 8 year period from about 1986 until 1994. We do know that on February 22, 1994, Aldrich Ames, a CIA counter-intelligence officer and analyst, and his wife were charged by the US Department of Justice with spying for the Soviet Union. From many published accounts, including one by Nicholas Kristof in the New York Times, it appears highly likely that Ames spying activities disclosed the covert identity of Plame along with that of many other CIA agents thus effectively ending her utility as a spy. So her undercover security was undermined at that time and she was brought back to Washington, DC for safety reasons.
Only 3 months after the Ames indictment, it appears the CIA set up a front company called Brewster-Jennings & Associates. According to the records, Brewster-Jennings was first entered into Dun and Bradstreet records on May 22, 1994. With an address at 101 Arch Street, Boston, Massachusetts, the company claimed to be a legal services office. According to its web site, the company billed itself as a law firm concentrating in the energy field. The site also claims they were founded in 1994 by company partner Victor Brewster. Also according to the site, the company conducts business with leading energy firms such as Mobil and ARAMCO. With offices in both Boston and Washington, DC the firm has staff with a combined 70 years of legal experience, eager to serve you.
But, according to a piece called "Apparent CIA front didnt offer much cover," the company had no visible presence at the 21-story office tower in Boston. It didnt even bother to file the state and local records required of most real businesses. Some from the real estate industry said they believed something was amiss, if not illegal about the company. Rob Griffin, regional president of a real estate firm that once oversaw the leased property remarked that Its almost like out of a spy novelthe tenant that wasnt there.
In fact, former intelligence officials mentioned in the story confirmed Plames cover was an invention and that she used other false identities and affiliations when working overseas. In fact one former intelligence official who did not want his name used in the story put it this way: All it was was a telephone and a post office box when she was abroad she had more viable cover. According to intelligence observers mentioned in the story, thats a good thing, considering how little work seems to have gone in to establishing the companys presence in Boston At the least, a dummy company ought to create the appearance of activity, with an office and a valid mailing address A cover that falls apart on first inspection isnt very good. What you want is a cover that actually holds up and this one certainly doesnt. David Armstrong, an Andover researcher for the Public Education Center, believed the Brewster-Jennings cover had not been done convincingly and that other covers would have been established for her by the CIA. In any case, the bottom line is that Plames non-official cover as an energy analyst with Brewster-Jennings was not apparently used until 1995 because the firm did not exist prior to that time. As a point of interest, Brewster Jennings the man was president of the old Vacuum Oil Company, a predecessor of Exxon Mobil. He is mentioned in the Forrestal Diaries edited by Walter Millis in connection with the importance of Middle Eastern oil.
While supposedly employed by Brewster-Jennings, Plame was apparently working in the Washington, DC area, as a history of addresses reported for her include one in Falls Church and one in Arlington, both in the Virginia suburbs of Washington DC and both in reasonable proximity to CIA headquarters.
In early 1997, about 3 years after the CIA established the Brewster-Jennings cover for Plame, she met her future husband, Joseph C. Wilson, IV, a career foreign service officer and diplomat, at a party in Washington, D.C. They married on April 3, 1998. Soon after, in 1999, they purchased a home on Charleston Terrace in Washington, DC in the exclusive Foxhall Road area close to Georgetown. They paid $735,000 for the home which records show had previously sold for a mere $44,000.
Its clear both Wilson and his new wife Valerie Plame Wilson were staunch Democrats who supported Al Gore for President. In fact both contributed money to the Gore 2000, Inc. campaign committee. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) records disclose that Mr. Joseph C. Wilson IV of Charleston Terrace, Washington, DC, who named J.C. Wilson International Ventures as his employer, contributed $2,000 to Gore on March 26, 1999. On April 22, 1999, his wife, who billed herself in the FEC records as Ms. Valerie E. Wilson, contributed $1,000 to the Gore campaign. She listed her employer as Brewster-Jennings & Associates. Just so theres no mistaking the fact that Valerie Wilson was and is a left-leaning Democrat, it should be noted that she more recently contributed $372 on October 11, 2004 to America Coming Together organization, a George Soros-backed liberal Democrat activist group. Interestingly, in the records documenting this contribution, she listed no employer and instead stated she was retired, a statement in clear contradiction of the facts. In short, she told a fib on her campaign disclosure.
About this same time (1999) or certainly not long thereafter, there is an interesting post on a web site for genealogists researching Polonnoye, Ukraine. The web page indicates the site was last updated on May 29, 2000, so posts on the page were made on or before that date. Among the queries listed on the page is one looking for information on the Plame surname by a researcher who called herself Valerie Wilson. The email address listed for replies is jvwilsoniv@cs.com. Clearly this was a post by Valerie Plame Wilson.
Moreover, about this same time the web site for the Saudi-linked Middle East Institute posted a biography on its web site for Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson, IV. The web page has since been taken down, but a search of cashed versions of the page indicate it was copyrighted in the year 2000 so this biography was posted in that year or before. The Middle East Institute biography concludes as follows: He [Wilson] is married to the former Valerie Plame and has two sons and two daughters. Another biography for Wilson is posted on the web site for the CPS Corporate & Public Advisory Group, and it also includes the notation that Wilson is married to the former Valerie Plame. The date for this biography is uncertain, but blog sources put it no later than some time in 2003.
The Bob Novak column which the main stream media claims outed Valerie Plame appeared on July 14, 2003. But before this date, what can be said about her? For one thing, until 1994, she very probably did not use the Plame name. She certainly did not use the Brewster-Jennings cover because it did not exist until May of 1994. In April 1999, she associated herself with the company called Brewster-Jennings which any self-respecting spy would quickly have concluded was a phony company and quite possibly a cover for some kind of covert operation in the international energy field. The company claimed it had ties to the Saudi Arabian Oil Company ARAMCO. In 1999, she also exposed her preference for Al Gore over George W. Bush for President. Sometime in 2000 (possibly before) we know Wilson himself identified his wife as the former Valerie Plame. He too had some kind of connections with the Saudi-backed Middle East Institute. We also know that not later than May 29, 2000, Valerie Wilson connected herself with the Plame surname and with the name of her husband Joe Wilson. The inescapable conclusion seems to be that if anyone really outed Ms. Wilson, it was not Bob Novak in July of 2003, but Plame and her husband well before that date. Whatever else can be said, Plame and her husband showed little concern over connecting her maiden name with her married name, nor did she worry about connecting herself with her CIA front company.
And what of the terrible damage done to covert operations? Well, it seems that from the time she was hired by the CIA in the mid to late 1980s until May 1994, she was using names and cover that remain a secret to the US public but which were likely revealed to the Soviets by Aldrich Ames. From May 1994 forward, Plame was not under any real coverunless the Brewster-Jennings farce is considered deep cover. This is doubtful as even former intelligence officials point out she used other identities when working overseasaway from her desk at Langley, Virginia, CIA headquarters.
The real question the main stream media continues to ignore is who in the CIA and/or Department of State went to bat to support Plames efforts to get her Bush-hating-Kerry-supporting husband an assignment in Niger which he would soon use to try and torpedo the Bush campaign. The signs increasingly indicate it was neither Rover nor Libby. A fact worth recalling is that Wilson was on the payroll of the Kerry campaign until he was thoroughly discredited by revelations proving he had lied about how he garnered the Niger trip. The Kerry camp pulled out all the stops to try and trash George W. Bush. Could they have had a hand in this phony outing setup? Judith Miller may hold the key.
Nice.
Thank you. The real story the MSM continues to ignore is a big elephant in the center of the room and it ain't Rove.
Ping
Wilson/Plame would get fried in court, should the case ever get that far, which it won't.
You should be working at CIA instead of misfits like Plame, Larry C. Johnson and the scores that have been cleaning out their desks since Tenet was replaced. Great Research!
You are absolutely right. I keep seeing suggestions on leftist web sites that the Wilsons should sue Rove in some civil action. Not a chance they would do that as that would expose them to discovery. And they can't stand that heat. Plame is clearly not the brightest bulb on the CIA tree--then again, missing the end of the Cold War and WMD in Iraq, maybe she is. And that's a bummer IMO.
My wife never suggested I should go into intelligence {;o)
Very good! BTT big time!
The MSM and the dims want to get Rove because he is da man, the architect of the Bush presidencies and the bane of their existence. They're tired of getting Roved.
The funniest part of this whole saga is the notion that Miller is sitting in jail because the release allowing her to name her "source" was, in her and the NY Times' words, "coerced". The only conceivable reason as to why she will not name her source is because to do so would be not only an embarrassment to her and her employer but quite possibly would be an admisssion of engaging in an illegal activity.
She and the Times knows who the source is and my guess is she's the source. Novak worked a deal with the prosecutor, possibly named her as the source and Miller, not wanting to invoke the Fifth Amendment during Grand Jury testimony, is hiding behind the supposed right of a journalist to protect a source. It's simply makes too little sense for her to be sitting in jail to protect Libby or Rove when those cats are basically already out of the bag.
So WHEN do those 'who know'. . .beg the question into the light of public scrutiny. . .are they waiting for this 'original' version to be cast into our history books. . .or another jaundiced film experience by Michael Moore?
Once this myth saturates public consciousness. . .the truth will not matter. . .
"The MSM and the dims want to get Rove because he is da man, the architect of the Bush presidencies and the bane of their existence. They're tired of getting Roved."
I think this effort was initially launched to try and shoot President Bush's campaign out of the water. When some of the MSM reporters tied Rove to the story--after the election--the leftist Democraps turned their guns on Rove. Unfortunately for them, the Dems have formed into a circular firing squad with the Wilsons in the middle.
Wilson was on the payroll of the Kerry campaign until he was thoroughly discredited by revelations proving he had lied about how he garnered the Niger trip. The Kerry camp pulled out all the stops to try and trash George W. Bush. Could they have had a hand in this phony outing setup? Judith Miller may hold the key.
I agree with your comments on Miller. A visit to Democrap web sites (KOS etc.) quickly demonstrate they hate Miller. And some journalism group just pulled back an award they had earlier voted to give to Miller for er...standing up for principle. Looks like she's down and out and not a friend on either the left or right. I hope the grand jury is extended beyond October and her ass rots in the slammer for years.
I am fairly pessimistic myself over whether the truth will out. I hope you are not correct in your analysis that the truth will not matter. But, you could be right.
One other point not picked up by the MSM is the fact that while we know Tenet and Cheney were not responsible for sending Joe Wilson to Niger, it's never really been explained who actually made the decision to send him there and why it was necessary in the first place, particularly someone of such relatively high visability. The president said what he said in his state of the union address and then the CIA sends someone over to Niger to prove it? Methinks some anti-Bush folks were out to get 'em.
According to Congressman Billybob:
"CIVIL contempt, meaning refusal to answer the questions of the Grand Jury, ends when that jury's term ends. And that term was set when that jury was first empaneled. However, if a new Grand Jury is empaneled to continue the same investigation, the witness can be called again, and again imprisoned for failure to answer. This, however, is very unlikely."
"CRIMINAL contempt, which means failure to answer questions before a court, does not have such a time limit. Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald can pursue criminal contempt against Judith Miller. If he feels that she is in the middle of a criminal activity, and that he can prove it, this is the option he would follow, other than simply letting her walk out in October."
- - Congressman Billybob
BTW ACT announced today it's closing the doors on most of its' big city offices and have sent out pinks slips to most of its' workers to look for other work. Looks like Soros has pulled the plug.
Lancey, thanks. Billybob is an authority. I hope he goes for criminal contempt. The investigator is no friend of Miller anyway as she blew an earlier investigation into Arab charities connected with terrorists. She deserves the full justice of the law.
Wilson went to Niger BEFORE the SotU Address. Wilson's initial op-ed piece in the LA Times, written right after he returned from Niger, said that Iraq may indeed have attempted to purchase yellow cake uranium. It wasn't until months later that he shopped around an entirely different op-ed piece, scooped up (naturally) by the New York Times, that spun 180 degrees from what he had initially opined. This was right after he joined the Kerry campaign.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.