1 posted on
08/04/2005 8:06:45 AM PDT by
Tomax
To: Tomax
Yes they are mutually exclusive, sorry.
To: Tomax
3 posted on
08/04/2005 8:08:35 AM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Tomax
I've had the pleasure of meeting Larry Witham in his capacity as one of the Religion writers for the
Washington Times. I'd be inclined to pick up his book and have a look.
That God created "all things visible and invisible" is an iron-clad Biblical truth; how He did it doesn't meet the same standard, IMHO.
6 posted on
08/04/2005 8:14:15 AM PDT by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: Tomax; sheltonmac
One thing seems to be forgotten in all this debate. The Scripture states that "death entered into the world through one man." That man was Adam. Now is death did not begin until Adam sinned, then evolution can't stand. Evolution needs "billions and billions" of years to work and all the while death is occurring as the strong survive. Death cannot exist before Adam, the Scripture says so.
9 posted on
08/04/2005 8:20:56 AM PDT by
scandalon
To: Tomax
If we are all to believe in creation, the real battle is to determine
which creation. Is this the one?
Tsimshian Creation Story
At the beginning of the world it was covered in darkness. A chief, a chieftianess and son lived at Kungalas. Although the child was greatly loved, he died without cause. The whole tribe mourned each day beside the boy's lifeless body. One morning instead of her dead son the chieftainess witnessed the rising of a boy out of her son's body which burned brightly. She was overjoyed to see her son come back to life. This glowing boy grew large until his father began to call him a giant. Giant boy ate most of the tribe's food, so his father sent him over the sea to find more to eat. Giant boy flew inland and took with him a stone, a raven blanket and a dried bladder full of berries. He dropped the stone in the ocean and rested upon it. Each time he dropped a stone and rested he created a new rocky island. Giant Boy scattered the berries across the land and created a forest filled with fruit. He scattered the salmon roe and trout roe into the rivers to create an abundance of fish. From this day Giant Boy never lacked food in the new world.
To: Tomax
Evolution implies that there was an extraordinary amount of time between the creation days.
Using the Bible as a guide makes this impossible.
The Lord created all plant life on the third day and then our sun and moon on the fourth day.
Being that the Lord cause all things to reproduce after their own kind, there could not have been a long period of time between those days. The plants needed the sun to survive then, just like they do now.
Some try to state that the creation days were 1,000 years long, based on misinterpretation of other scriptures. If that were true, then there had to have been 500 years of darkness immediately after the plant life was created, followed by 500 years of light. The plant life would not have survived that.
18 posted on
08/04/2005 8:35:27 AM PDT by
Preachin'
(Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
To: Tomax
I'll repeat what transpired in out local discussion.
"You're the MORON! The important thing is that evolution is science, creationism, or ID is superstition. When was the last time you heard of teaching Astrology in a science class."
So we might as well teach astrology.
To: Tomax
Evolution and God Aren't Mutually ExclusiveThis guy misses it. . .that's not the issue. The issue is the protectionism that evols display in not wanting any questions about the theory of evolution raised.
56 posted on
08/04/2005 11:31:45 AM PDT by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: Tomax
My question to all 'Christians' who believe in evolution is:
At what point along the evolutionary line did man acquire a soul?
To: Tomax
Science and religion can co-exist.
Wernher von Braun (Pioneer rocket engineer) "I find it as difficult to understand a scientist who does not acknowledge the presence of a superior rationality behind the existence of the universe as it is to comprehend a theologian who would deny the advances of science."
109 posted on
08/05/2005 10:25:44 AM PDT by
mware
(Now we know why the NYT didn't have time to cover AIR AMERIKA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson