Freep This Poll

South Bend Tribune ^ | 08/02/05 | Poll

[onehipdad]

Freep this poll:

TODAY'S POLL Do you believe a supreme court nominee should state in advance how they would vote on controversial issues?

* Yes, we have a right to know where they stand on major issues

* No, their credentials and past public record speak for them

* I don't know

Poll can be found at www.southbendtribune.com

[xcamel]

Why even bother with "pollitorials" - they already have the answer they want....

[plain talk]

They need at oleast one additional choice such as

Yes, if nominated by a Republican president.

[Just A Nobody]

Do you believe a supreme court nominee should state in advance how they would vote on controversial issues?
Total votes: 1353

Yes, we have a right to know where they stand on major issues = 43%

No, their credentials and past public record speak for them = 50%

I don't know = 5%

[trimom]

I may not be the sharpest crayon in the box, but isn't that like a juror making up his mind before a trial starts? "Bring in that guilty SOB so we can give him a fair trial before we hang him?" Then, again, maybe there is a nuance there that is too subtle for the common folk.

[newsgatherer]

link please for us lazy folk

[AbeKrieger]

The NO question is worded incorrectly. Try it this way:

NO, the facts of each individual case should be what determines a justice's ruling.

[Capn TrVth]

http://www.southbendtribune.com/

3rd or 4th paragraph down on left. FREEPED.

[scott0347]

Do you believe a supreme court nominee should state in advance how they would vote on controversial issues?

Total votes: 1455

Yes, we have a right to know where they stand on major issues 41%

No, their credentials and past public record speak for them 52%

I don't know 5%


FReeped

[trisham]

South Bend Tribune Online - Poll Results

Do you believe a supreme court nominee should state in advance how they would vote on controversial issues?
Total votes: 1467
Yes, we have a right to know where they stand on major issues 41%
No, their credentials and past public record speak for them 52%
I don't know 5%
Return to Previous Page
SBT Reader's Polls are conducted informally and are for entertainment purposes only

[ElPatriota]

Done! - I know these polls, in many cases, are really meaningles. They are designed to make news. They ask the question, they know their audience will answer to and how. And then, the use the "poll." to tald about the 'news." But just piss them off a bit

[newsgatherer]

thanks.