Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Totenberg "Surprised How Very, Very Conservative [Roberts] Was"
Media Research Center ^ | August 1, 2005 | Brent H. Baker

Posted on 08/01/2005 1:05:11 PM PDT by kennedy

A parody of herself? NPR's Nina Totenberg, who has tagged Supreme Court nominee John Roberts as "very conservative," "very, very conservative" and "very, very, very conservative," as well as "a really conservative guy," "a hardline conservative" and "a clear conservative," to say nothing of being "a conservative Catholic," on Inside Washington over the weekend relayed that after she "spent five hours reviewing all of his documents from when he worked in the Justice Department," she "was actually quite surprised at how, how very, very conservative he was." Apparently, she didn't listen to herself.

Inside Washington is a weekend show carried Saturday nights at 7pm local time by NewsChannel 8, a Washington, DC area all-news channel owned by the ABC affiliate, and Sunday mornings at 10am, right after This Week, by that affiliate, WJLA-TV.

On the edition aired over this past weekend, Totenberg asserted: "I've known John Roberts for years. I think it's a very sensible pick in all serious ways. But I must say that when I was, spent five hours reviewing all of his documents from when he worked in the Justice Department, I was actually quite surprised at how, how very, very conservative he was. He fought with people much more senior than he was, who we would all consider very conservative like Ted Olson and Rex Lee, who was Solicitor General. They weren't conservative enough for him. And even William Bradford Reynolds, the head of the civil rights division, on a couple of occasions, there was Roberts saying to the Attorney General you shouldn't authorize this employment discrimination lawsuit, Reynolds is wrong about it."

Previous CyberAlert items on Totenberg's labeling of Roberts, both with pictures of her:

# July 21 CyberAlert: There's no doubt in NPR reporter Nina Totenberg's mind that Judge John Roberts is "very conservative," it's just a matter of how "very." On NPR's All Things Considered on Tuesday night, she prefaced "conservative" with three verys, describing him as "a very, very, very conservative man." But in a taped soundbite on the next day's Good Morning America on ABC, she cut back to two modifiers, dubbing him merely "a very, very conservative man." For the quotes in full: www.mrc.org

# July 25 CyberAlert: NPR's Nina Totenberg, who last week tagged Supreme Court nominee John Roberts as "very, very conservative" and "very, very, very conservative," on Inside Washington over the weekend described him as merely "very conservative." But she couldn't resist adding a modifier every time she applied the conservative label, also dubbing him "a really conservative guy," "a hardline conservative" and "a clear conservative." Plus, she emphasized how he's "a conservative Catholic." See: www.mrc.org


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: johnroberts; roberts; scotus; seahag; supremecourt; totenberg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: dead
I think everybody has missed Nina's obvious lie...

"I've known John Roberts for years. I think it's a very sensible pick in all serious ways. But I must say that when I was, spent five hours reviewing all of his documents from when he worked in the Justice Department, I was actually quite surprised at how, how very, very conservative he was...

It has been widely reported that the Bush administration released some 75,000 pages of documents. Calculating Nina's rate of review allows her some 15,000 documents per hour - or 250 documents per minute - or 4 documents per second!

Nina is a whiz kid - she has such an unbelievable ability to read, analyze and criticize official documents.

61 posted on 08/01/2005 1:46:42 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

You know, I'm not concerned if John Bolton is He's very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very conservative.

But suppose he's very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very conservative?


62 posted on 08/01/2005 1:47:26 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is merely Nazism without the snappy fashion sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
So if Nina Totenberg and Ann Coulter were to accidently bump into each other would be have a matter/anti-matter event?

Nina Totenberg

Ann Coulter

Yet another reason why it is better to be a conservative than a liberal.

63 posted on 08/01/2005 1:49:14 PM PDT by kennedy ("Why would I listen to losers?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Totenberg herself was never investigated for recieving and disseminating classified material.

must be some sort of double standard.

64 posted on 08/01/2005 1:51:26 PM PDT by palmer (If you see flies at the entrance to the burrow, the ground hog is probably inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

That's a excellent question, but unfortunately it's too long to print. The finer shades of truth unfortunately can't be explored in the opinion section of the newspaper.


65 posted on 08/01/2005 1:52:34 PM PDT by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: inquest

That's not how I read the opinion. I think he simply understands the distinction between "wrong" and "unconstitutional." That is a distinction that too many Supreme Court Justices seem unable or unwilling to make.


66 posted on 08/01/2005 1:53:24 PM PDT by kennedy ("Why would I listen to losers?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

I figured Nina would be out trolling for old girl friends, female co-workers, etc of Roberts.


67 posted on 08/01/2005 1:54:47 PM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Ahh, but you forget. Liberals don't have to actually read documents. They can divine their meaning merely from from the emanations of their penumbra.


68 posted on 08/01/2005 1:57:29 PM PDT by kennedy ("Why would I listen to losers?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Ahh, but you forget. Liberals don't have to actually read documents. They can divine their meaning merely from the emanations of their penumbra.


69 posted on 08/01/2005 1:57:45 PM PDT by kennedy ("Why would I listen to losers?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
I will never forget Nina's dishonest description of the Clinton videotaped testimony. The issue was whether Clinton heard this lawyers claim "no way, shape or form of sexual activity", and let the lie stand.

The tape showed Clinton's head and shoulders, and eyes open simply looking slightly downward, with no visible activity or reaction.

Nina told her radio listeners that the tape showed him "looking distracted" during his lawyers incorrect assertions (quote from my recall.)
70 posted on 08/01/2005 2:08:54 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

Nina Totenberg is very, very, very disturbed


71 posted on 08/01/2005 2:15:19 PM PDT by tom paine 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish

couldn't agree more about the whole Hill/Thomas travesty. i really felt it was a lynching and it was my first view of how absolutely unethical the Left could be. altho' i remembered the Borking and felt it was unfair, i felt that the Hill charge was ridiculous and since it was leaked and Thomas was smeared before he had much of a chance to respond, it made me furious. i haven't calmed down since. as a "reasonable" feminist in the business world i must say i found her story totally unbelievable. i also moved squarely into the "convservative" column after that debacle.


72 posted on 08/01/2005 2:23:52 PM PDT by avital2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

OMG! He's CATHOLIC???? Get a rope!!! How will we survive with one more Catholic on the SC more than the Jewish contingency! Oh NINA dear, It's getting on my last nerve to hear Jewish people dissing Catholics and Christians.


73 posted on 08/01/2005 2:26:41 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

Actually, given Nina's ringleader role in the Anita Hill affair trying to keep Thomas off the Court, maybe Nina is signalling her future intentions. She's probably searching Capitol Hill for Coke cans and pubic hairs, recalling the Dim escapades at the time.


74 posted on 08/01/2005 3:17:04 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

"..really, really, really, really, like, really conservative..."


75 posted on 08/01/2005 4:34:25 PM PDT by My2Cents ("The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth." -- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
Like I said, the only thing he felt was wrong (as opposed to unconstitutional) was the particular exercise of the power in question. He didn't necessarily think it was wrong (I mean in his personal opinion) for the police to have that power in the first place.
76 posted on 08/01/2005 4:43:42 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

NPR's two listeners must be very interested!


77 posted on 08/01/2005 4:49:29 PM PDT by Doc Savage (...because they stand on a wall, and they say nothing is going to hurt you tonight, not on my watch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

Nice hairdo Nina! Every girl in my high school yearbook had a similar one,......................IN 1959 you bimbo!


78 posted on 08/01/2005 4:51:05 PM PDT by Doc Savage (...because they stand on a wall, and they say nothing is going to hurt you tonight, not on my watch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

"Conservative" is now an official, Liberal four letter word.


79 posted on 08/01/2005 4:54:52 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

I consider Rush Limbaugh a moderate.


80 posted on 08/01/2005 4:57:22 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson