Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

May suggests that even a broken clock is right twice a day.
National Review ^ | 8/1/2005 | Clifford May

Posted on 08/01/2005 8:20:38 AM PDT by bjc

Arianna Judges Judy Could Judy Miller have been the White House’s source?

Here's a sentence I never thought I'd write: Arianna Huffington has a point.

She reports in the July 27 edition of "The Huffington Post" that in the halls of the New York Times, among the colleagues of imprisoned reporter Judy Miller, a theory is being debated. It boils down to this: Perhaps after Joseph Wilson's notorious op-ed appeared in the Times, Judy called a source (or two) in the intelligence community to find out how and why Wilson was sent by the CIA to Niger to investigate whether Saddam Hussein had sought to purchase uranium.

Perhaps her source(s) told her that Wilson got the assignment thanks to his wife, Valerie Plame, who works at CIA HQ in Langley.

Now further suppose that Miller is trying to develop this into a larger story on Wilson and the controversy over the Bush administration's arguments for regime change in Iraq. So she calls people in the White House, Karl Rove, maybe, or Dick Cheney deputy Scooter Libby or someone. (Newsday identified a meeting Miller had on July 8 — two days after Wilson's op-ed appeared, with an "unnamed" government official.)

Judy perhaps says: "My sources tell me that Wilson's wife works at the CIA and that she was the one who recommended that he get the Africa assignment. How does that square with Wilson's claim that Cheney sent him to Niger, and that Cheney received his report and ignored it?"

At this point, whoever in the White House Miller talked with would know about Plame — but not based on their access to classified information.

And he (or she or they) still would not necessarily know that Plame had some sort of undercover status. Judy's source(s) might not have told her that. Indeed, the source(s) might not have known. The source(s) may have become acquainted with Plame at CIA HQ in Langley. Presumably, Plame would not have told such colleagues that she occasionally worked undercover. They'd have no "need to know."

Rove, Libby, or others might have passed on what they learned from Judy to Bob Novak or Matt Cooper or other reporters. Why not? They'd want to tell the truth, to rebut Wilson's false spin that Cheney had sent him to Africa and then had ignored his conclusive report.

They would not be revealing to reporters any facts derived from their access to classified information. And they still wouldn't have any idea they were discussing a CIA secret (or sometimes-sort-of-secret) agent rather than a run-of-the-mill agency analyst.

If this is close to what happened, it would explain why Judy would not feel free to testify before a grand jury. Were she to do so, she'd get her source(s) fired, and probably prosecuted. Reporters don't like to do that.

It also would explain why independent prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald is keeping Miller in the slammer. If it were she who first told someone in the White House (who no doubt told others in the White House) about Plame, her testimony would be the key that solves the puzzle. In fact, without that key, it might be impossible for to Fitzgerald solve the puzzle.

There is much else in the Huffington post that is purely speculative and she also manages to throw plenty of mud at Rove and others — including Judy Miller whom Huffington accuses of having pushed "manipulated, twisted, and exaggerated intel in the Times."

But Huffington's basic point is perceptive (another sentence I never thought I'd write): Miller may not want to reveal her "source" at the White House "because she was the source....In this scenario Miller wasn't an innocent writer caught up in the whirl of history. She had a starring role in it."

— Clifford D. May, a former New York Times foreign correspondent, is president of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a policy institute focusing on terrorism.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: judymiller; plame; rove; wilson
Makes perfect sense. A reporter is the start and the end of a story. Quite Orwellian when you think about it.
1 posted on 08/01/2005 8:20:40 AM PDT by bjc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bjc

Been saying this for weeks now... Miller is the center of this investigation and knows the answer to the open questions, not Rove.


2 posted on 08/01/2005 8:24:27 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Free Michael Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bjc
Yeah, Arianna got this one right, but only because she reads Free Republic.
3 posted on 08/01/2005 8:24:45 AM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bjc

I hope he's right! It would be sweet irony if it turned out that Miller was the snitch herself and not someone "in the administration"!


4 posted on 08/01/2005 8:27:51 AM PDT by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Yeah, Arianna got this one right, but only because she reads Free Republic.

Pukin Dog! You betta be careful dahling or I'll make you go to bed with me. Und you vill wake up a leftist queer like my ex-hoosband and Al Franken did!

Arianna "Zsa Zsa" Huffington

5 posted on 08/01/2005 8:33:47 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (Get all the incumbents out of politics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bjc
 

 

 
[If this is close to what happened, it would explain why Judy would not feel free to testify before a grand jury. Were she to do so, she'd get her source(s) fired, and probably prosecuted. Reporters don't like to do that. ]

But it does not explain the converse. Let's say you were Karl and Judy told you this story. Would you not ask her how she got this information in a manner of confirming it's accuracy before you believed it? I certainly wouldn't accept a reporter telling me there were little green men on mars at face value.  And if that is true, there is no unwritten law of White House Aide/Source confidentiality and these guys were interviewed by Fitzpatrick.

Then again to argue against myself, Judy Miller may be a trusted reporter and her comments may be assumed to be accurate all the time.  In fact, I trust Clifford May!
 

!

 

6 posted on 08/01/2005 8:39:32 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Liberals believe common sense facts are open to debate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bjc

Let's not bee too generous with the stuck clock being right twice a day, it implies Arianna might get another one correct soon. The blinking 11:00pm on my VCR is only right once a day, I think that analogy fits better!


7 posted on 08/01/2005 9:55:14 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson