Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Way to show the terrorists that we mean business, Leonie!
1 posted on 07/30/2005 6:07:57 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Brinkema, Leonie M.

Nominated by William J. Clinton on August 6, 1993, to a seat vacated by Albert V. Bryan; Confirmed by the Senate on October 18, 1993, and received commission on October 20, 1993.

2 posted on 07/30/2005 6:10:57 AM PDT by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Nominated by President Bill Clinton. Surprised?
4 posted on 07/30/2005 6:13:08 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Judge Leonie M. Brinkema AGAIN!


5 posted on 07/30/2005 6:13:21 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

"""Khan's attorney, Jonathan Shapiro, said his client "didn't hurt anybody; he didn't shoot anybody. I think it's an abomination he is facing all the time he is facing.""

Ok. We wait until he slaughters some people and THEN lock him up. Got it.


6 posted on 07/30/2005 6:14:31 AM PDT by InsureAmerica (the only free cheese is in a mousetrap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Khan's attorney, Jonathan Shapiro, said his client "didn't hurt anybody; he didn't shoot anybody. I think it's an abomination he is facing all the time he is facing."

Anybody else find this relationship ironic?

7 posted on 07/30/2005 6:16:00 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
And this pinhead is why the sentencing guidelines were written in the first place. But if there's one thing judges of every stripe and ideology, state or federal, hold to is the sacredness of judicial discretion. And why not? Where else can such a gaggle of political sychophants get such well paying jobs, and convince themselves that they're brilliant. After all, if they weren't, they wouldn't have all that discretion, would they?
8 posted on 07/30/2005 6:16:21 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Brinkema is a damned fool. These Jihadis are from out here in my neighborhood. We do not wish for them to return here. If the judge wants them out early, the judge can make special provisions for that in her own home.

Alternatively, "W" should pack that judge away for safekeeping for the duration of the war ~ just like Wilson did others who commited sedition during wartime.

9 posted on 07/30/2005 6:16:31 AM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

This is just astounding. I have to wonder if judges like this actually WANT to have more terrorist attacks in this country.


11 posted on 07/30/2005 6:17:29 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Typical for a Clinton hack it's all about perception and not reality. She reduced one of the men's sentence from 85 to 65 years. Ok, so he will get out of prison when he is 90 instead of when his 115. I can live with that. In her mind, she has now shown compassion. What a moron.


14 posted on 07/30/2005 6:19:38 AM PDT by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Another federal judge who doesn't get it. Terrorists really deserve the death penalty. Her act makes an excellent case for shifting terrorism offenses to military tribunals.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
16 posted on 07/30/2005 6:20:03 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Chapman, 32, renewed that allegation yesterday. "I see this case as an attack against Islam, and so does the Muslim community," he told Brinkema at the hearing. His voice quavering, Chapman said he has been unfairly labeled a terrorist and treated as such by prison guards.

He actively conspired and trained with at least ten other men to violently attack the nation that nurtured him and protected his rights to work, own property, and practice Islam, rights strictly circumscribed or denied to Christians in the Islamic world.

His sentence was reduced from 85 years to 65 years in prison. The judge said she would have happily reduced it much more, but was prevented from doing so by mandatory sentencing guidelines for firearms related crimes (which, apparently, the SCOTUS decision didn't touch).

Still a good deal for the perps, especially when compared to the death sentences that the perps' fellow Jihadists carried out on the victims of 9/11.

18 posted on 07/30/2005 6:34:13 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

My question is, why was she even allowed to hear the case considering her 'pre-bias' against the sentence?

"U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema was pleased that she had the chance to lessen sentences she had criticized as excessive..."

The procescutor should appeal this. And probably could win on those grounds.



20 posted on 07/30/2005 6:35:17 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

You know, right now there are folks on Fox saying how they think the London bombings were just "testing the gear" for a big event in the US. Knowing this, we're still treating these terrorist killers (whether they personally murdered with their own hands or not) like they're juvenile delinquents who tipped over farmer Jones' out-house.


21 posted on 07/30/2005 6:38:41 AM PDT by MizSterious (Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

The Clinton legacy strikes again.


22 posted on 07/30/2005 7:11:58 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

I was thinking the other day about the German spies who got caught in the U.S. during World War II. They were sent to try to sabotage war production plants. At least one of them was caught, tried, and set to be executed. President Roosevelt insisted that the man be executed, as a warning and example of what would happen if this were tried again. I think this precedent is well worth considering today.


23 posted on 07/30/2005 7:16:30 AM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
to comply with a recent Supreme Court ruling that allowed judges more discretion on such issues.

Don't you just love our separation of powers.

Here we have one group of pin head judges giving another group of pin head judges the power to override the laws of Congress.

I expect any day for them to rule that the president and both houses of congress are unconstitutional.

It might not be a bad idea.

At least we wouldn't have to pay them while they're busy spending our money on their pork projects and the courts are already doing their jobs anyway.

24 posted on 07/30/2005 7:26:40 AM PDT by mississippi red-neck (You will never win the war on terrorism by fighting it in Iraq and funding it in the West Bank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
In the case, 11 Muslim men, all but one from the Washington suburbs, were charged with taking part in paramilitary training, including playing paintball in the Virginia countryside, to prepare for holy war abroad.

I'm sure there was more to it than this.

28 posted on 07/30/2005 7:40:20 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Liberalism = suicide


31 posted on 07/30/2005 8:30:18 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Free Michael Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
There was a ludicrous article in the Montgomery county gazette about the fellow named Khan, including his pic where he makes every effort to at least look the part of a terrorist jihadi.
Apparently right after 9-11 he traveled to Pakistan to sign some papers for his mother regarding property in his dead fathers name. Then while he was in Pakistan he visited a terrorist training camp....oh, but he wasn't there for the training...no,no, he was looking to buy some land on the property. Oh, and he also used to go paintballing with the other jihadi's in Virginia, which is also just a coincidence considering he lives in Montgomery Village, Maryland. It's just a set of coincidences that's all....and for that he got life plus 65 yrs, which this Clinton judge has reduced to life plus 45.
35 posted on 07/30/2005 8:54:02 PM PDT by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

This is just plain stupid. Congress has had over six months to figure out what to do about Booker/Fanfan. And what have they done besides have a couple of hearings? Nothing. Flippin idiots.


36 posted on 07/31/2005 12:17:16 AM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson