Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lorianne

They should only be charged for 50% of the bill.


4 posted on 07/29/2005 9:01:05 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CindyDawg
They should only be charged for 50% of the bill.


Bravo!
9 posted on 07/29/2005 9:17:19 PM PDT by dagoofyfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CindyDawg
They should only be charged for 50% of the bill.

Why even that much? If it's the "woman's choice" to have the child in the first place according to the womb police, why should she be able to FORCE him to procreate? He should be able to concede all rights and have his responsibilities waved too. It's only FAIR in a nation that claims to have "reproductive freedom" and it would never happen because NOW, Planned Parenthood, NARAL, et al. are all about CONTROL and *not* about equality.

If she can't afford to support the child on her own and he were able to obtain a declaration that he didn't want the child, such children should be moved immediately into an adoption situation. No more single baby-mommas on the public dole.

44 posted on 07/30/2005 12:58:14 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Circumcision = Barbarism. It's HIS body; what about HIS right to choose? Choose LIFE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CindyDawg

Exactly.


98 posted on 08/08/2005 12:02:38 PM PDT by DesignerChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson