Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Bush Win, House Narrowly Approves CAFTA
Associated Press ^ | July 27, 2005 | JIM ABRAMS

Posted on 07/27/2005 9:14:44 PM PDT by RWR8189

WASHINGTON - The House narrowly approved the Central American Free Trade Agreement early Thursday, a personal triumph for President Bush, who campaigned aggressively for the accord he said would foster prosperity and democracy in the hemisphere.

The 217-215 vote just after midnight adds six Latin American countries to the growing lists of nations with free trade agreements with the United States and averts what could have been a major political embarrassment for the Bush administration.

It was an uphill effort to win a majority, with Bush traveling to Capitol Hill earlier in the day to appeal to wavering Republicans to support a deal he said was critical to U.S. national security.

Lobbying continued right up to the vote, with Vice President Dick Cheney, U.S. Trade Representative Rob Portman (news, bio, voting record) and Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez tracking undecided lawmakers.

The United States signed the accord, known as CAFTA, a year ago with Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and the Dominican Republic, and the Senate approved it last month. It now goes to the president for his signature.

To capture a majority, supporters had to overcome what some have called free trade fatigue, a growing sentiment that free trade deals such as the North American Free Trade Agreement with Mexico and Canada have contributed to a loss of well-paying American jobs and the soaring trade deficit.

Democrats, who were overwhelmingly against CAFTA, also argued that its labor rights provisions were weak and would result in exploitation of workers in Central America.

But supporters pointed out that CAFTA would over time eliminate tariffs and other trade barriers that impede U.S. sales to the region, correcting the current situation in which 80 percent of Central American goods enter the United States duty-free but Americans must pay heavy tariffs.

The agreement would also strengthen intellectual property protections and make it easier for Americans to invest in the region.

"This is a test of American leadership in a changing world," said Rep. Kevin Brady (news, bio, voting record), R-Texas, a leading proponent of the agreement. "We cannot claim to be fighting for American jobs and yet turn our backs on 44 million new customers in Central America.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: cafta; gatt; nafta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 821-836 next last
To: Certain_Doom
Sure they are, my wife works there and loves it.

Yeah, I say Wal-Marts commercial of the 55 year old woman, telling everyone how proud she is to work at Wal-Mart.

I personally can't believe what I am seeing and hearing.

21 posted on 07/27/2005 9:34:01 PM PDT by Black Tooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

I for one welcome our new free-trade overlords. C',mon, this is gonna be great! I mean there's sooo much in this bill that can benefit all of us (non-citixens).


22 posted on 07/27/2005 9:34:10 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

The choice was CAFTA or give Central America to China.

Anybody who doesn't understand that needs to learn about the inroads China is making in the countries below our border.

They understand long-term strategic thinking and chess.


23 posted on 07/27/2005 9:34:15 PM PDT by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

This is not free trade

It appoints an extra-soverign body to oversee trade!

Bye bye United States of America...

...hello Americas.


24 posted on 07/27/2005 9:34:41 PM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I "SAW"...


25 posted on 07/27/2005 9:34:46 PM PDT by Black Tooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Diplomacy.308
But not to real conservatives.

You mean Whigs.

26 posted on 07/27/2005 9:35:28 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth

BUMP! Exactly right, patriciaruth.


27 posted on 07/27/2005 9:35:41 PM PDT by onyx (North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Diplomacy.308

So, you'd rather have them immigrate here illegally looking for jobs, instead of working and producing in their home country? Every human on this earth wants to better himself, and most want to do it in their own country. The only reason they try to move here is because we offer freedom and liberty, something their countries currently don't offer, it's God given right to every human. Is that a bad thing? Your family came here from somewhere, but that was Ok then.


28 posted on 07/27/2005 9:35:49 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
NAFTA has proved to be a disaster for our country.

Said the economically ignorant...

29 posted on 07/27/2005 9:36:01 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
That's right. 21 million new jobs and higher real wages. Save us from more good stuff like that. LOL!!!

If it created soooo many new jobs, why is our trade deficit with Mexico worse than before?

30 posted on 07/27/2005 9:36:17 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Well stated and I agree with your comments!


31 posted on 07/27/2005 9:36:54 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Certain_Doom
Sure they are, my wife works there and loves it. Ooops, hope the anti-Wal-Mart crowd doesn't come after me now.

Why is it that all the people who complain about Wal-Mart are people who don't work there?

32 posted on 07/27/2005 9:37:14 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
If it created soooo many new jobs, why is our trade deficit with Mexico worse than before?

If it was so bad for us, why are we doing so well?

33 posted on 07/27/2005 9:37:54 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Certain_Doom

please note the burned cross in your front yard that you should expect to see obligitory for being pinned a pro-walmarter is in the process of being approved in subcommittee. thank you and shop union. if not, we will come and attack you and take away everything you own and give it to the people. after subcommittee vote of course. thank you. /sarcasm


34 posted on 07/27/2005 9:38:54 PM PDT by edmond246 (I lived through a month and a half of Union Hell. It's the worker's paridise-lite. (e.g. Cuba))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I guess after we create 10 million more jobs you will point to CAFTA and shriek, "Bush's fault!!!"


35 posted on 07/27/2005 9:38:54 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Your family came here from somewhere, but that was Ok then.

Yes they did.

Legally.

36 posted on 07/27/2005 9:39:23 PM PDT by Diplomacy.308 (Often, talking is a waste of breath. Sometimes 'diplomacy' requires harsh action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
It's like the telephone game we played as kids. I hate walmart because it's to big. And the parking lot sucks with the perpendicular parking.
37 posted on 07/27/2005 9:39:24 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

"Horsecrap, Brady. As if we make anything that your new "customers" can afford."

Exactly. NAFTA was a badly negotiated deal that was sold as a job creator for our country. All it did was send the trade deficit with Mexico through the roof while U.S. companies bolted south for cheap labor. Maybe, just maybe, one day the American people will tire of being sold out by congress.


38 posted on 07/27/2005 9:39:42 PM PDT by clearlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
NAFTA has proved to be a disaster for our country.

Yes, unions have lost a lot of power, and our manufacturing sector needs a savvy rethink, not just a knee-jerk complaint; but our unemployment is lower than when NAFTA was passed and the percent of people owning their own homes is higher than it has ever been, so I can't agree with the word "disaster."

39 posted on 07/27/2005 9:39:59 PM PDT by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
why is our trade deficit with Mexico worse than before?

There is no such thing as a "trade deficit".

You flunk Walter Williams class....or as the British now say...you have received a "Deferred Success" on your paper.

40 posted on 07/27/2005 9:41:42 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 821-836 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson