Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Thank you Al Gore and the environazies.
1 posted on 07/27/2005 6:09:11 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: KevinDavis; Brett66

Space ping.


2 posted on 07/27/2005 6:09:37 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse
Thank you Al Gore and the environazies.

What I want to know is if Bush didn't have the balls to tell the greenies to take a hike on this one. If the Montreal Protocol is the reason the Shuttle has been grounded, heads should roll.

3 posted on 07/27/2005 6:13:19 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

The foam during the Columbia disaster was replacement over "environmental" issues. The original foam had not exhibited a tendency to break off. Have they reverted to the original foam, or are they still risking people's lives over Global Warming?


4 posted on 07/27/2005 6:14:11 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

OK, what the heck has NASA been doing for the past two years? It is completely insane that the exact same problem that killed 7 on Columbia happened again. I thought they spent the past two years and millions this very issue. For it to happen again is beyond belief...what kind of shop are they running down there?

If I was the current crew, I would be furious that they allowed this to happen again. I realize that space travel is a very dangerous business and you can never be sure that nothing will go wrong...but at least fix known problems...just plain crazy.


5 posted on 07/27/2005 6:15:45 PM PDT by kyperman (Hows this for a face you love to hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

I just want to hear NASA confirm it followed the same procedures it always has to ensure that the tiles in this area were affixed properly. If that's true, either the glue maker or the tile maker is doing something different and wrong. If that's NOT true, NASA is doing something wrong.

Either way, someone needs to be bouncing on asphalt for this cockup.


6 posted on 07/27/2005 6:17:08 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (Kelo, Grutter, Raich and Roe-all them gotta go. Roberts on+2 liberals off=let's start the show!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

Thankfully it didn't harm the orbiter. I'll reserve any furthur judgement until the mission is over. While I am confident the crew will return safely, it does no good to second guess anybody while we have a crew in space.


7 posted on 07/27/2005 6:19:10 PM PDT by rs79bm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

The external tank is not available for inspection...this will not happen again.


9 posted on 07/27/2005 6:21:20 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse



http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/7/11/121741.shtml

http://www.watchblog.com/republicans/archives/000764.html


12 posted on 07/27/2005 6:24:25 PM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse
NASA is now kowtowing to the Enviro-commies? I wish we'd just scrap the whole thing.
15 posted on 07/27/2005 6:30:24 PM PDT by Jaysun (Democrats are motivated mainly and perhaps almost wholly by envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

WTF has been going on down at NASA the last TWO YEARS anyhow? What do you mean "until foam issue fixed"!!!!The foam issue crashed the LAST shuttle-and TWO YEARS later we've just kicked another crew up there "to see what happpens"!!!...but we'll fix the "foam issue" later. Sheeesh..what kind of astronauts we got that will put up with this @#ap!!


18 posted on 07/27/2005 6:30:56 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

Just what is the Montreal Protocol?


19 posted on 07/27/2005 6:31:09 PM PDT by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse
I`m sure some won`t like this but I have to ask,why are we wasting time and money on this thing?
If we as a country feel it is in our national interest to explore space,which I think is still open to debate,than lets do it.
Lets find a way to extract product (oil or other source of energy) from the Moon or Mars or gain a military advantage (we are the only country that does`nt seek to exploit or dominate from its military advances)so maybe it will be a deterrence to our enemies.
If the shuttle is`nt providing either and is imposing a human risk on top of a monetary burden than end it.
20 posted on 07/27/2005 6:32:39 PM PDT by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

If you think about it, with the EPA around, human space travel is no longer safe for the US. I guess we'll have to give over the exploration of space to a country that does not have to answer to the EPA.


21 posted on 07/27/2005 6:33:15 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

Prayers for their safe return.


27 posted on 07/27/2005 6:37:39 PM PDT by Ciexyz (Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse
During the STS-87 mission, there was a change made on the external tank. Because of NASA's goal to use environmentally friendly products, a new method of "foaming" the external tank had been used for this mission and the STS-86 mission. It is suspected that large amounts of foam separated from the external tank and impacted the orbiter

http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/people/journals/space/katnik/sts87-12-23.html

29 posted on 07/27/2005 6:39:07 PM PDT by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

Here is a quick solution: go back to the OLD foam that didn't fall off and tell the envirowhackos to go kill a truck load of puppies.


34 posted on 07/27/2005 6:57:15 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; ...
Yep...


40 posted on 07/27/2005 7:13:22 PM PDT by KevinDavis (the space/future belongs to the eagles, the earth/past to the groundhogs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse
The Columbia disaster is not the first time the environmentalist have destroyed a shuttle.

This is not the first time that has happened. The cause of the 1986 Challenger explosion is officially established as hot gases burning through an O-ring joint in one of the solid-rocket boosters. NASA was roundly criticized for its decision to launch in cold weather over the objection of some engineers, but there was a deeper cause that was not as widely reported.

In 1985 NASA had switched to a new putty to seal the O-ring joints. The new putty became brittle at cold temperatures, thus allowing Dr. Richard Feynman to teach NASA a famous lesson. At the congressional hearing investigating the accident, he simply placed some of the O-ring putty in a glass of ice water and crumbled it in his fingers.

NASA had changed the sealant because its original supplier for O-ring putty stopped producing it for fear of anti-asbestos lawsuits.

Excerpted from Earth Worshippers Cause Death in Space: Environmental Dogma Has Led to the Sacrifice of Fourteen Astronauts on the Space Shuttle

78 posted on 07/27/2005 9:55:28 PM PDT by yhwhsman ("Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small..." -Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse
Discovery's astronauts were told of the foam loss before going to sleep Wednesday.

Oh, so THAT is what that KLUNK was??? G'nite, zzzzzzz.....

97 posted on 07/27/2005 11:49:59 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: anymouse

The flight back is going to be a real nail biter - could break rating records.

Wish them all the luck!


102 posted on 07/28/2005 12:26:24 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson