Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Diegans vote to save cross 75% resist ACLU effort to remove historic structure
World Net Daily ^ | July 26, 2005 | WND

Posted on 07/27/2005 10:46:39 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot

San Diegans vote to save cross 75% resist ACLU effort to remove historic structure

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: July 27, 2005 12:44 a.m. Eastern

© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

Mt. Soledad cross and veterans memorial above San Diego (soledadmemorial.com) After 15 years of adverse court rulings, the citizens of San Diego voted to save the city's historic Mt. Soledad cross.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: aclu; cross; culturewars; freedom; jackbootedfascists; mountsoledad; mtsoledad; religion; sandiego
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
The start of a defeat for the ACLU scum. It is not over yet, but we have to keep fighting.
1 posted on 07/27/2005 10:46:40 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

Will some federal judge overturn the vote?


2 posted on 07/27/2005 10:48:41 AM PDT by tal hajus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tal hajus

Probably


3 posted on 07/27/2005 10:49:28 AM PDT by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

I bet the ACLU lost because they didn't "get their message out" or "energize their base" enough. [sarc]


4 posted on 07/27/2005 10:49:31 AM PDT by BROKKANIC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tal hajus

I was watchign the local san diego news last night and the athiest scum and his lawyer were on and they were saying the vote didnt matter whether a 100% of the city voted for it, theyll take it to the courts and win. F@#$#@ scum.


5 posted on 07/27/2005 10:50:09 AM PDT by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
But ACLU attorney James McElroy insists the vote is meaningless.

"It still doesn't mean a damn thing," he said, according to the San Diego Union-Tribune. "Voters should have never voted on it. It's a waste of taxpayers' money."


So, I guess the voters get no say in how they spend their own tax money? Fascist state apologist alert!
6 posted on 07/27/2005 10:51:29 AM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

Way to go San Diego!


7 posted on 07/27/2005 10:52:32 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

Regardless of the merit of lack thereof in their cases, I think it no coincidence that it is a communist organization is doing all it can to remove all traces religion from daily life.


8 posted on 07/27/2005 10:53:00 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tal hajus
Will some federal judge overturn the vote?

Sooner or later the People will prevail. This cross in no way represents an "Establishment of a state religion", and judges are smart enough to know it. Now if the people will just realize their power?

9 posted on 07/27/2005 10:53:55 AM PDT by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tal hajus
You betcha
10 posted on 07/27/2005 10:54:49 AM PDT by dts32041 ( Dear Senator Durbin, I am not an Illinois Nazi. (US ARMY RET))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

Let's hope this trend to defeat the ACLU extends to all parts of the country. The ACLU is evil.


11 posted on 07/27/2005 10:56:14 AM PDT by Isabelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
I just heard this on the nooz.

They will go back to court, there are enough rat judges out there that they will eventually get lucky.

In any case, this is good news, even if the referendum is eventually overturned. Nothing energizes people like winning a poll and having it summarily thrown out by a communist judge...

Well, I used to think like that when I was younger anyhow.
12 posted on 07/27/2005 10:56:52 AM PDT by mmercier (know of the things that are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SDGOP


This is the good part of Tuesday's election. Donna Frye getting 43% of the vote makes me even happier that I have left my home town forever. Unreal to think of that witch as the probable next mayor.


13 posted on 07/27/2005 10:58:04 AM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS)) Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

The ACLU will take it to court on the grounds that the voters didn't make the right choice.


14 posted on 07/27/2005 10:58:28 AM PDT by Trimegistus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

It would have been a lot harder for her to get that much of the vote had the supposedly reputable politicians before her not managed to keep getting indicted.


15 posted on 07/27/2005 11:00:30 AM PDT by arbusto99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
"It still doesn't mean a damn thing," he said, according to the San Diego Union-Tribune. "Voters should have never voted on it. It's a waste of taxpayers' money."

I used to credit the fact that some arrogant scum like this could walk down the street and not get lynched on the self control of the American people. I'm starting to credit it more to apathy.
16 posted on 07/27/2005 11:00:38 AM PDT by CrazyIvan (If you read only one book this year, read "Stolen Valor".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tal hajus

Before the election, they got some judge to rule that the vote had to pass by 2/3rds or it would lose. The cross actually got 3/4th of the vote.


17 posted on 07/27/2005 11:04:04 AM PDT by SmithL (There are a lot of people that hate Bush more than they hate terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

Californian voters, if serious about preserving the right to have Christian symbols in the square, will have to recognize the party attempting to take them away and vote against or fund their own primary challengers that will not embrace the Hard Left. They have one of two choices, but voting the current Dem establishment to office is allowing this to occur. Until they do that, these people are empowered.

But it IS a good sign the vote is as it was, I don't think anyone doubts where the country stands on this across the board, and a judge tossing out their will is NOT going to go over well.


18 posted on 07/27/2005 11:04:20 AM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arbusto99

She's part of the problem! She's a huge union advocate. Typical democrat.


19 posted on 07/27/2005 11:04:39 AM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS)) Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
So what? The Supreme Rulers have not instructed you as to what they will allow.

Know your place: Await your Rulers.

20 posted on 07/27/2005 11:04:41 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Islam: Nothing BEER couldn't cure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson