Posted on 07/25/2005 3:22:39 PM PDT by Alex Marko
It is probably not a good idea in terms of job security to publicly call your boss a horse's ass. So have some sympathy for Will Adams, spokesman for Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo. He was asked by reporters to explain the asinine thing the congressman said last week. Adams told them Tancredo is just a "free thinker." By which standard Michael Jackson is just a tad eccentric. Or haven't you heard? Tancredo thinks maybe the United States should bomb Mecca. You know Mecca. City in Saudi Arabia. Birthplace of the prophet Muhammad. Holiest shrine of Islam, a religion practiced by one of every six people on Earth. That's the place a U.S. congressman thinks maybe we should lob some ordnance at.
Tancredo made this contribution to the national dialogue last week during a talk show on WFLA, a TV station in Orlando, Fla. Host Pat Campbell had asked how we should respond if U.S. cities are ever struck by terrorists using nuclear devices. "Well," said Tancredo, "what if you said something like, if this happens in the United States, and we determine that it is the result of extremist, fundamentalist Muslims, you know, you could take out their holy sites."
"You're talking about bombing Mecca," said Campbell.
"Yeah," said Tancredo.
Predictably, Tancredo's suggestion has been a little controversial. That is, if you can call statements of condemnation stretching from Moscow to the State Department to Ankara, Turkey, "a little controversial."
Tancredo has refused to apologize, but he did issue a written "clarification," which said in part, "I do not advocate this. Much more thought would need to be given to the potential ramifications of such a horrific response."
Actually, you don't need to give any thought to the ramifications of such an action, because they should be self-evident to anyone smarter than the average hamster. We would become an international pariah. Muslims would hate us with renewed fervor, and Osama bin Laden would thank us for writing his recruitment material.
In other words, the same situation we have now, except worse. Much, much, much worse.
And I wonder: Am I the only who feels that lately - lately being defined as since Sept. 11, 2001 - the nation seems overrun by yahoos?
Granted, the presence of yahoos in daily life is not a new torment. They have always been among us, the simplemindedness of their thinking exceeded only by the volume at which they express it. Think Cliff Clavin, the cogs of his brain lubricated by beer, holding forth from his stool at the end of the bar. Of course, the only thing you had to do to avoid Cliff was to stay out of Cheers.
But the 9/11 attacks have unleashed yahooism on an unprecedented scale. Cliff is no longer confined to his bar stool. Under the name Mona Charen, he once wrote a newspaper column advocating the expulsion of Muslims from America. Under the name Rush Limbaugh, he has a radio talk show on which he compared the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib to a fraternity prank. Under the name Ann Coulter, he calls for the racial profiling of travelers from the Middle East. And under the name Tom Tancredo, he is apparently a member of Congress.
What he doesn't get - what yahoos usually don't get - is that things that seem to make sense while you're hoisting a few rarely hold up in the sober light of day.
Tancredo has cast his refusal to apologize as a blow against political correctness. Which is silly. One can be plain-spoken without being reckless, blunt without being stupid, straight-forward without sounding like a fool.
Assuming, that is, you have something worthwhile to say. Tancredo evidently does not. Somebody tell him his beer is getting warm.
youre foolish....none of those countries will support the US if it is nuked and responds by nuking Mecca.
those countries you mention are all democracies and their citizens are increasingly anti-american...the US would get 0 support..
as Europe become more and more muslim watch for native europeans to become more and more anti-american
Simple: PANDEMIC. It just began.
We have to remember the words of that great Irish American: Patty Henry!!
"The bombing starts in 5 minutes!"
He did not hurt the Republican Party, too much.
LVM
Those nations are socialist, and have marginal military usefulness.
Currently, the balance of forces tilts to the US no matter how you look at any scenario.
nuking MEccas isnt going to happen stop dreaming.
also Tancredo as i have written elsewhere has done tremendous damage to his cause of illegal immigration.
It will be easier now to villify those who want immigration controls.
Tancredo should go.
Three nukes go of in American cities, followed by total silence from both dar-al-Islam and dar-al-Harb.
Fifty- seven muslim capitals disappear under massive nuclear explosions, followed by total silence from both dar-al-Islam and dar-al-Harb.
What's the difference?
Extra points given to any answer that is truly coherent.
Why is it assumed that mysterious nuclear explosions can only happen within the U.S.?
Well put.
Any sane person knows that you just can't send the nukes flying willy nilly.
You give 'em 60 minutes advance notice.....THEN....nuke 'em.
Sorry, it's a flaw I've had for a long time.
LVM
""The only difference is that Tom's comments match announced policy.""
so who has announced we would nuke Mecca besides crazy tancredo?
Of course.
If I weren't convinced totally, I would have already bought my prayer rug.
After all, Michael Medved and Hugh Hewitt have both been relentlessly pounding into me the idea that resistance is futile; Not because we are wrong, but because there are "too many" of them.
57 Muslim cities. Why so few?
Have you actually read Tancredo's comments? Did you read them in the original context in which they were propounded?
so you wont answer who has stated that our policy is to nuke mecca.
this nuking mecca is a dellusional fantasy, brought on by people who are frightened and have no clue how to fight a WOT. very very simple minds are work
Will the Persians be glad or upset that Islam will have been smacked-down since it was forced upon them by Arabs? I read some very hostile anti-Muslim/Arab posts on an Iranian site, and I got the impression they'd be pleased if there were no Islam anywhere. I wonder if the billion-plus number of Muslims would suddenly decline substantially.
By sheer coincidence, that's the number of muslim-by-law countries in the world today.
Your mileage may vary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.