Posted on 07/25/2005 12:43:26 PM PDT by Happy2BMe
Because it's not a small % of idiots.
Has anyone here truly read the Koran, because I don't have time to. The Islamists normally retort that we have violence in our scriptures as well, and we explain that the violence is not part of the underlying theme. Then they say the same and that Jihad takes on a number of meanings. Well, either violence and conversion is at the heart of the religion or it is not. Somebody must know the answer.
BTW, how can we as citizens prove to the oligarchs in office that Tancredo is a true representative that needs to be heard. Example: Goldwater was considered dangerous to the war in Vietnam, yet the alternative was over 50,000 dead Americans doing it Johnson's way. Now who's the extremist??
"Hispanic, Islamic Groups Want Tancredo Out."
Funny, that's just what I wanted them--OUT.
Tancredo BUMP.
Shall we embellish it a bit to "terrorist-sympathizing, illegal-invader lovin'" birds of a feather? ;-)
"If the America suffers another devastating attack worse than 9/11 Tancredo is a shoo in"
Perhaps he is, but I would hope we do not need to hope for an attack in order for us to win the White House again. We need a Tancredo, but not that badly.
Depends how the devices are deployed. Could be as little as three days.
Really packin' em in. Why is this even news?
It's news because these "200" are standing against a Republican. It we had 10,000 stand against a democrat, it wouldn't be news. The MSM is a little biased against us...
Here's what I would like to know -- what does this Imam expect us to do when they kill 15 or 20 million of us? Should we all convert to Islam? Why doesn't some reporter ask him? I would like to know the answer and I want to kow why a reporter won't ask..
""Guess they'll just have to vote him out but I wish them rotsa ruck."
Many of their members probably aren't eligible to vote."
They'll still vote Dem anyway.
Being registered, a citizen or even alive and kicking hasn't been a prerequisite for voting Dem in a long time.
A hawk might be, not necessarily Tancredo.
What ever happened to: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." ?
"What would happen if a prominent Muslim made that statement about Catholic holy places like the Vatican?" asked Ali.:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1450251/posts
Interesting. Neutron?
One measure of a man is who his enemies are!
Actually I think he crossed the line just a bit too far simply because such a statement could come back to haunt him in a debate.
Don't count him out. Republicans are fed up.
So, can Halliburtion drill though glass? If not they need to get working on that.
I have to conclude that adherents of islam are mental deficients.
The rational question would be phrased thus:
If the vatican attacked major muslim cities with nuclear weapons, and the muslims threatened to retaliate in kind, I'd be right there supporting them.
Mental deficients may be too mild a phrase.
Hey, that's working for me already!
And so how many times do we have to listen to 'Death to America' and 'Kill Bush', before we decide that Islam is NOT a nice place?
You mean they need more ammunition to hate us?
Seems they 'hate' us without it.
And as far as 'seeking allies in the M.E.', tell me.
How many M.E. nations are in Iraq and Afghanistan helping us?
Please!
These people don't need a reason to kill us and threatening to 'NUKE MECCA' is just a talking point for them and isn't going to change one damn thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.