Posted on 07/24/2005 5:29:08 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
LOL....
The White house should turn over all its internal documents to the Senate judiciary just as soon as the Senate judiciary members turn over all their internal documents.
White House will turn over all its internal judiciary documents as soon as the Senate judiciary members turn over all there internal judiciary documents.
and we all know that isn't going to happen anytime soon
No official request has been made to date. "We will do everything we can to accomodate the process."
Brit is pressing the issue...Gonzales is acknowledging the sensitivity of the security info.
Like never
The dim talking points are that Rove and Cheney's chief of staff, "Scooter" Libby, are both being investigated for perjury because their testimony conflicted with that from Time Magazine's Matt Cooper.
Hmmmmmmmm, let's see. You have two of the highest ranking individuals in government accused of lying about something that isn't a crime. They have fully cooperated with the prosecutor from day one, both providing consistent and verifiable facts. Their testimony conflicts with the low rent "reporter" (read leftist political hit man) married to the hildabeast's "media advisor" (read leftist political capo). That "reporter" has fought the prosecutor from day one, told numerous and obvious lies in public about what he has and has not said to the grand jury and has written scathing personal attacks on the other parties. For one thing Cooper has already admitted that he testified that he took notes of his conversation with Rove which he now claims was a "mistake" in his memory to explain why he doesn't have any notes (the notes obviously contradict his spin on what was and was not said by whom).
And the other reporter embroiled in the controversy, Judith Miller, now sitting in jail for contempt, is also under investigation by the same prosecutor for having intentionally leaked information about a pending FBI raid to a terrorist fund raising "charity," allowing them to destroy all of their records.
Whom to believe? Whom to believe?
Somebody's going to get indicted for at least perjury, but I don't think Karl and Scooter have a thing in the world to worry about.
Listen for the squeals of outrage from the stuck pigs who now dominate the uber leftist dims when Cooper (and his wife?) get indicted for conspiracy and obstruction of justice. Watch for literal bombs to start being lobbed by the reliable old media when Judith Miller gets indicted under the Patriot Act for providing aid to a terrorist organization.
Oh, and watch for treason indictments against Joe Wilson and the entire team at CIA where Plame works for running a rogue operation within the agency designed to undermine the elected government through lies and criminal leaks of falsified information.
Dare we dream of a RICO indictment against the entire Democrat party?
Fred Thompson's measured responses to Timmy's questioning made Timmy sound a bit like an hysterical school girl. Abortion, abortion, abortion. Yuck.
Chuckie Schumer up next on FNS. Very nice of him to take enough time out from behind reporter microphones to be interviewed...
Good Morning, AB.
you got it...
maybe even fat Teddy's alcohol bill...
"I hope Thompson rips Durbin a new one."
Unfortunately, they weren't on together, so he didn't have a chance to do so. However, I liked Fred's reponse to Timmy's, Do you think that Rehnquist's court is a conservative court? Fred answered something to the effect of, No - have me back and give me about 1/2 hour to tell you why. ('course he could have just said, No - three words: Ginsberg, Souter, Breyer.
You can add Durbin and two other senators for leaking classified CIA intelligence satellite information to the mix. Three Democrats all putting Top Secret information into the Senate record. Shouldn't they be scrutinized as well? Rove did not lead specifics he was not privy to, but these three Democrat Senators certainly did.
Has a better ring to it.
Chuck wishes he could vote for Roberts. Needs to know his "judicial philosophy".
Durbin says that Roberts has to prove he is worthy of the appointment. Saying that the atty-client privilege docs are necessary because we don't have enough to work with. Here it comes, folks.
I prefer "Chuck the Schmuck."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.