This is the rough draft. I'll check for typos before sending.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: doug from upland
2 posted on
07/23/2005 11:12:01 AM PDT by
Peach
To: doug from upland
Where did you find this? LOL!
5 posted on
07/23/2005 11:15:42 AM PDT by
Types_with_Fist
(I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
To: doug from upland
Sounds fair to me. I suggest it be sent by registered mail.
6 posted on
07/23/2005 11:17:06 AM PDT by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
To: doug from upland
2nd to last sentence needs a "public good" in there somewhere, I think.
To: doug from upland
go doug go!!!
If there is any justice in this world, he should have to move ever 6 months for the rest of his life!
If you really want to get to him, you should go after his family's properties as well. Wonder if he has any property that has been in the family for generations? Nothing worse than having the family mad at you!
9 posted on
07/23/2005 11:19:40 AM PDT by
Mister Da
(Nuke 'em til they glow!)
To: doug from upland
Short version...
Dear David,
ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US
Yours truly
10 posted on
07/23/2005 11:20:37 AM PDT by
LRS
To: doug from upland
I wish I could link to an editorial that was in my (NH Union Leader) paper a couple days ago. It said that the Selectmen in the town of Weare were ever so much wiser than the SCOTUS as they rejected the taking of private land for such activities. If only the SCOTUS had done the same.
12 posted on
07/23/2005 11:21:37 AM PDT by
Past Your Eyes
(I don't care if it rains or freezes)
To: doug from upland
Has anybody heard Souter's response to this effort to steal his house from him using his own ridiculous decision? I would love to know what he thinks.
14 posted on
07/23/2005 11:23:04 AM PDT by
msnimje
To: doug from upland
If we could only do something like this the greedy Pennsylvania lawmakers.
16 posted on
07/23/2005 11:23:50 AM PDT by
Temple Owl
(19064)
To: doug from upland
P.S. ... Informing him that he will carry the mortgage which will be subordinated to the seven million construction load is an especially nice touch.
20 posted on
07/23/2005 11:25:37 AM PDT by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
To: doug from upland
This is GREAT. It will be extrememly interesting to see what happens.
21 posted on
07/23/2005 11:26:48 AM PDT by
TAdams8591
(Off-the-cuff-comments are NOT CLEAR and CONVINCING evidence.)
To: doug from upland
need to have something in there about how the property is being purchased in order to promote the public interest through increased tax revenue, as well as the potential to employ 60-100 full-time employees upon completion, as well as bringing significant revenue to the town through the increased tourism to the area that the development will cause.
mispelled INSPECTION
I like it. Illustrating absurdity with the absurd.
22 posted on
07/23/2005 11:28:23 AM PDT by
RobFromGa
(Send Bolton to the UN!)
To: doug from upland
I absolutely, freaking, love it. How can I help?
30 posted on
07/23/2005 11:34:43 AM PDT by
Tennessean4Bush
(An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds, a pessimist fears this is true.)
To: Nightshift
40 posted on
07/23/2005 11:58:34 AM PDT by
tutstar
( <{{--->< OurFlorida.true.ws Impeach Judge Greer)
To: doug from upland
41 posted on
07/23/2005 11:58:47 AM PDT by
tutstar
( <{{--->< OurFlorida.true.ws Impeach Judge Greer)
To: doug from upland
Just wondering, why is Judge Souter the only SCJ who is getting this treatment?
44 posted on
07/23/2005 12:01:24 PM PDT by
Ditter
To: doug from upland
5. SUBORDINATION. Seller to subordinate the seller financing described in No. 4 above to a construction loan of no greater than $7,000,000 at prevailing rate and terms.I would NEVER subordinate a 1st. position without additional consideration(s).
67 posted on
07/23/2005 1:30:00 PM PDT by
elbucko
To: doug from upland
5. SUBORDINATION. Seller to subordinate the seller financing described in No. 4 above to a construction loan of no greater than $7,000,000 at prevailing rate and terms. Nice touch Doug. As one broker to another that is a nice little twist. Should get the city fathers salivating.
68 posted on
07/23/2005 1:31:44 PM PDT by
jslade
("If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried."(Seminole Cty, FL))
To: doug from upland
You also have to send offers to buy to at least two of Souter's neighbors, or you won't be able to move into phase 2 of your evil plan. That's what Kelo demands, and that's what they'll get.
To: doug from upland
I like condemnation through Eminent Domain better.
76 posted on
07/23/2005 9:47:20 PM PDT by
FReethesheeples
(Was the Narcissistic Joe Wilson a Source in "Outing" His Own Wife Valerie Plame as a "CIA Agent"?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson