Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Marx-Mohammed Pact
Military.com ^ | July 21, 2005 | William S Lind

Posted on 07/22/2005 8:28:12 AM PDT by robowombat

In 1939, the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact cleared the way for Hitler to start World War II. The Pact caught the world by surprise, because it was an alliance between two bitter enemies, Nazi Germany and Communist Russia. Similarly, what made possible the recent bombings in London, and the many more that will follow in Europe and the U.S., is the Marx-Mohammed Pact. Once again, two sworn enemies, Marxism -- specifically the cultural Marxism commonly known as Political Correctness -- and Islam, have made a Devil's bargain whereby each assists the other against a common enemy, the remnants of the Christian West.

From a Fourth Generation war perspective, the most important fact about the London bombings is that they were carried out by legal residents of the British Isles. It appears that three of the four bombers were British-born. British columnist Andrew Rawnsley, writing in The Observer, noted “the psychological impact on the country of discovering that the worst terrorist atrocity ever inflicted on the capital was perpetrated by British-born young men who were keen on cricket and worked in a chippy.”

This fact in turn points to what may be the West's biggest strategic blunder, namely its immigration policies. European and American immigration policies have imported, and continue to import, millions of immigrants who are deeply hostile to the traditional cultures of their new homelands. Moslems are not the only immigrants who harbor such hostility, but at present they seem the most likely to act on it. A piece in the July 17, 2005 Cleveland Plain Dealer -- by Zachary Shore cites a survey of German Islamics which

found that almost one-third of those polled agreed that Islam must become the state religion in every country.

Even though they live in Europe, 56 percent declared that they should not adapt too much to Western ways, but should live by Islam. More than a third insisted that if it serves the Islamic community, they are ready to use violence against nonbelievers.

Obviously, these immigrant Moslem communities pose a clear and present danger to the Western countries they now inhabit. Equally obviously, given its history and what its adherents are doing around the world, Islam itself is a threat. Europe, and the United States, need to stop more Islamics (and, in the U.S., Hispanics) from coming, and at least some of the Islamics now in residence must go.

But here is where the cultural Marxists come in. The ideology of Political Correctness, which is really the cultural Marxism of the Frankfurt School, says you can't do anything like that. In fact, you can't even talk about it. In Tony Blair's ultra-PC Britain, even saying the obvious about Islam -- that it is a religion of war and always has been -- is illegal. People have gone to jail for it. When one defendant quoted from the Koran to prove his point, a British judge condemned him anyway, ruling that “truth is no defense” if Political Correctness labels truths “hate speech.” In Hell, Marx, Mao and Marcuse are rubbing their hands in glee.

Of course, cultural Marxism despises Islam as much as Christianity, and the Islamics only question would be whether to behead the cultural Marxists before or after the Christians who refuse to convert (my guess is before). But that does not stop the cultural Marxists from forbidding the West to defend itself from Islamic immigration, or the Islamics from going through the door Political Correctness holds open for them. At a conference I attended in Lisbon in April, whenever those of us from the West talked about restricting Islamic immigration into Europe, the Islamics hauled out the PC bogeyman of “racism,” “exclusion,” “diversity,” etc. Some Europeans joined me in telling them to stuff it, which was a hopeful sign.

In the real world, “diversity” is a synonym for Fourth Generation war on your own soil. As I have said before, the West's immigration policies are importing 4GW by the boatload. London was only a foretaste of what those policies will bring to Europe and America. If we dare rip down the camouflage nets cultural Marxism has erected to blind us, we see Europe has two real choices: an infinity of Londons or second expulsion of the Moors.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: islam; marx; pharisee; redjihad; williamslind
Proving even blind hogs some times find corn Willam Lind points out the real and very un-PC reason for the London bombing. Soon to be coming to Detroit or Hackensack?
1 posted on 07/22/2005 8:28:12 AM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: robowombat

"This fact in turn points to what may be the West's biggest strategic blunder, namely its immigration policies. European and American immigration policies have imported, and continue to import, millions of immigrants who are deeply hostile to the traditional cultures of their new homelands. Moslems are not the only immigrants who harbor such hostility, but at present they seem the most likely to act on it. A piece in the July 17, 2005 Cleveland Plain Dealer -- by Zachary Shore cites a survey of German Islamics which

found that almost one-third of those polled agreed that Islam must become the state religion in every country."

And our government isn't worried at all. Just keep letting Muslims in and let them build their mosques.


2 posted on 07/22/2005 8:31:04 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

ping


3 posted on 07/22/2005 8:34:44 AM PDT by ocr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
"one-third of those polled agreed that Islam must become the state religion in every country"

Yes, that is their goal. Interesting this is a 1600 year-old fight between ISLAM's attempt to conquer "by the sword" and the moral strength of the Christian West to fight back. Sadly it comes at a time when liberals have de-bunked Christianity so well that many intelligent Westerners no longer believe. And most disappointing, the Catholic Church that once led the fight against Islam through Pope Urban, now rots from the abomination within. God help President Bush.

4 posted on 07/22/2005 8:37:12 AM PDT by NetValue (No enemy has inflicted as much damage on America as liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetValue

You are so right. I went back to school 7 years ago and began taking Literature courses. What struck me most was how British literature in particular until relatively recently saw the world as a struggle between Christianity and Islam. I wondered at that... until 9/11. Then I realized that there had merely been a brief hiatus of an on-going conflict. I now look at the history of the last 1600 years in a totally new way.


5 posted on 07/22/2005 8:50:47 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

The Marxist see Islam as a tool to be used. Once the United States is out of the way, they think they can deal with Islam. When people think of the USSR, they usually only think of Marxism's failure to control the old Orthodox Church. But, they also failed to control Islam in the Soviet Republics as well. Of course, the Marxists want to blame their failures on the reactionary forces of the US, without considering the flaws of their religion, Marxism...


6 posted on 07/22/2005 8:52:29 AM PDT by LRS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Marx-Mohammed Pact. Once again, two sworn enemies, Marxism -- specifically the cultural Marxism commonly known as Political Correctness -- and Islam, have made a Devil's bargain whereby each assists the other against a common enemy, the remnants of the Christian West.

You betchya! I'm sure most voters have noticed it for themselves, but some are too busy and need to catch up. The liberal left isn't working on behalf of America. Not at all.

7 posted on 07/22/2005 9:00:16 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Interesting article.

You know, if it came down to making a choice, I'd choose the Muslims over the Marxists. I've known some really wonderful Muslims who are here to work hard and take care of their families. They have zero interest in Jihad that I can detect.

But every Marxist is a menace to everything we hold dear.

-ccm

8 posted on 07/22/2005 9:10:09 AM PDT by ccmay (Question Diversity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

btttt


9 posted on 07/22/2005 9:11:28 AM PDT by dennisw ( G_d - ---> Against Amelek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"The Pact of Dung"


10 posted on 07/22/2005 9:14:18 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Interesting, but either last year or the year before, at some kind of islamic function or big religious gathering, several clerics gave speeches on how capitalism was incompatable with islam.

What made it amusing was a few clerics (who were also extremists) who argued that since Mohammad was a merchant and had no problem with capitalism, and who supported capitalism (honestly, he was indifferent to any and all economic concepts, but hey) that would mean that capitalism was islamic.

I think at the end most of them believed that socialism was more islamic then capitalism.

They also don't like dissent even in their own ranks on anything, period.

11 posted on 07/22/2005 9:15:15 AM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
second expulsion of the Moors

I think this is the most likely solution, only this time around lets identify them as 'Muslims', not Moors or Barbary Pirates, so that future generations are not confused about who the enemy is.

12 posted on 07/22/2005 9:17:35 AM PDT by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Oh Lydia, oh Lydia, say, have you met Lydia?
Lydia The Tattooed Lady.
She has eyes that folks adore so,
and a torso even more so.
Lydia, oh Lydia, that encyclo-pidia.
Oh Lydia The Queen of Tattoo.
On her back is The Battle of Waterloo.
Beside it, The Wreck of the Hesperus too.
And proudly above waves the red, white, and blue.
You can learn a lot from Lydia!


13 posted on 07/22/2005 9:18:25 AM PDT by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Good article!


14 posted on 07/22/2005 9:19:25 AM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

15 posted on 07/22/2005 9:26:15 AM PDT by StoneGiant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson