Posted on 07/22/2005 7:55:15 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
A man has been shot dead by police at Stockwell Tube station in south London, as officers hunt four bombing suspects. Police are also searching an address in London's Harrow Road. Resident Patricia Osbourne said she heard six shots.
Scotland Yard said the raid was one of several taking place in the city after Thursday's attempted bombings. BBC correspondent Danny Shaw said there were unconfirmed reports police had said the man shot at Stockwell was the Oval bomb suspect.
Passenger Mark Whitby told BBC News he had seen a man of Asian appearance shot five times by "plain-clothes police officers" with a handgun.
BBC correspondent Graham Satchell, at the Harrow Road incident, said the focus of the large police presence appeared to be an internet cafe. As well as armed officers in body armour, there were about seven police vehicles and an ambulance, he said. People in the area were "nervous", he added. Station evacuated Police have cordoned off a 200-metre area around Stockwell station. The incident followed four attempted bombings in the capital on Thursday at Oval, Warren Street, Shepherd's Bush stations and on a bus in Shoreditch in east London.
Passengers were evacuated from Stockwell station, which is on the Northern Line and Victoria Line. Teams of forensic officers are working inside the station, and police helicopters are hovering overhead. Services on the Victoria and Northern lines were suspended following a request by the police. Mr Whitby, told BBC News: "I was sitting on the train reading my paper. "I heard a load of noise, people saying, 'Get out, get down!'
"I saw an Asian guy run onto the train hotly pursued by three plain-clothes police officers. 'Bomb belt'
"One of them was carrying a black handgun - it looked like an automatic - they pushed him to the floor, bundled on top of him and unloaded five shots into him. "I saw the gun being fired five times into the guy - he is dead," he said.
BBC Home affairs correspondent Margaret Gilmore said officers had challenged a known suspect they had been following. "He ran, they followed him. They say they gave him a warning, they then shot him. "They brought in the air ambulance. They did everything they can to revive him. He died at the scene." Police had warned they would shoot to kill if they believed somebody to be a threat, she added. BBC crime correspondent Neil Bennett said the suspect was being followed as a result of CCTV footage seen by officers investigating Thursday's explosions.
The Muslim Council of Britain said Muslims were concerned about a possible "shoot to kill" policy. Spokesman Inayat Bunglawala said: "There may well be reasons why the police felt it necessary to unload five shots into the man and shoot him dead, but they need to make those reasons clear. "It's vital the police give a statement about what occurred and explain why the man was shot dead." Another passenger on the train, Anthony Larkin, told BBC News the man had been wearing a "bomb belt with wires coming out". "I've seen these police officers shouting, 'Get down, get down!', and I've seen this guy who appears to have a bomb belt and wires coming out.
"People were panicking and I heard shots being fired."
The man burst in through the door to my right and grabbed hold of the pole and a person by the glass partition near the door
Former Flying Squad officer, John O'Connor, told BBC News: "The man shot must either be one of the bombers or a potential suicide bomber." Bombers "don't always carry sports bags" and the man could easily have been wearing a bomb belt, he added.
If he had been challenged by police and failed to stop they "have not got a lot of alternative", Mr O'Connor told BBC News. Officers would be trained to aim for the head as shots to the torso could trigger a hidden explosive device, he added. Londoner Dan Copeland was in the carriage in which the man was shot. He told BBC News: "We were sitting for a few minutes on the platform, then we heard shouting from the concourse between the two platforms.
"Then the man burst in through the door to my right and grabbed hold of the pole and a person by the glass partition near the door, diagonally opposite me. "An officer jumped on the door to my left and screamed, 'Everybody out!' "People just froze in their seats cowering for a few seconds and then leapt up. "As I turned out the door onto the platform, I heard four dull bangs. "I ran past an armed officer who was standing on the platform and ran up the stairs."
After Thursday's London blasts, the bombers fled when detonators went off, causing small blasts, but failed to detonate the bombs themselves. A massive hunt is under way for the men. Analysts believe evidence from the four scenes could throw light onto the bomb attacks carried out on 7 July. The attempted attacks caused travel chaos across the capital, with several lines closed and Tube stations evacuated. Scotland Yard commissioner Sir Ian Blair said the attacks had been intended to kill people.
|
"misunderstanding"
Yep, we are supposed to die by their hands, not the other way around! Sorry CAIR..today you lose. Look forward to more misunderstandings! Specifically, that lard ass, Mr.Hooper.
I'm coming around to your point of view. Here's a security pundit arguing that same case persuasively.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4707781.stm
There's also a link to a video interviewing the guy whose eye-witness account of the 'arrest' has been so widely publcised.
I'm sure they locked down the house after he left...but they're looking for others...and they let him go as far as they could before he wiffed he was being followed.
Thanks bernie:
" Last Updated: Friday, 22 July, 2005, 14:07 GMT 15:07 UK
E-mail this to a friend Printable version
Will police now shoot to kill?
The shooting happened in front of dozens of Tube passengers
A Muslim group has said it is concerned there is a new police "shoot to kill" policy in the UK following the shooting dead of a man in south London.
The Muslim Council of Britain said it was getting calls from Muslims who were "distressed" about the incident at Stockwell Tube station.
Roy Ramm, former Met Police specialist operations commander, said the rules for confronting potential suicide bombers had recently changed to "shoot to kill".
One terrorism expert said if the shooting was carried out by police - rather than special forces - it would represent a "pretty big departure" for the UK force.
Professor Michael Clarke, professor of defence studies at King's College London, said the officers who carried out the operation in south London were unlikely to be police.
'Head shot'
"These guys may have been some sort of plain clothes special forces," he said.
"To have bullets pumped into him like this suggests quite a lot about him and what the authorities, whoever they are, assumed about him.
"The fact that he was shot in this way strongly suggests that it was someone the authorities knew and suspected he was carrying explosives on him."
He added: "You don't shoot somebody five times if you think you might have made a mistake and may be able to arrest him."
Prof Clarke said police officers were not trained to carry out operations in this way. "
"Even Special Branch and SO19 (Scotland Yard's armed unit) are not trained to do this sort of thing.
"It's plausible that they were special forces or elements of special forces."
Thanks, this friend of my wife and mine, gets a little scary with some of his "predictions". The day after 7/7, he said that the ring leader/bomb builder probably had installed cell phones into the bombs carried by the now dead Jihadists. When he knew that they were situated, he speed dialed them to set off the bombs. He figured the guy on the bus had chickened out and was trying disarm the bomb.
I know what my side of our discussions will be today.:)
Lived many years there myself. I find that usually a general crowd does not act in concert, when in hind sight they might have. There are many cases in which the armchair know-all press cite crowd inertia. Often there is only the one or even two persons who will intervene.
I was a security guard in a large mall in Canada. A two bit low life punk tried to drop kick me to oblivion. 300 watched. Only two men tried to help. Not to cry the blues, but I will wager there are some American security personel out there, had a similiar experience.
For laughs- sitting in the open fast food area,burly middle-aged men afterward, advised me just how THEY would have flattened the punk.
Perhaps there are certain cultures and different American States, where the crowd pitches in- have not heard of them though.
Wow. Was this guy shot by police or some kind of special tactics unit?
" Not exactly...he gets 72 women who look exactly like Helen Thomas and Hillary Clinton."
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!
The tactics used today are pure SAS. The question is whether the shooter was serving SAS, ex SAS in a police anti-terror unit, or a cop trained by the SAS.
It's pretty clearly their style though, whatever his badge.
Sounds like a few FR threads I've read lately!
BRAVO to them for "giving chase" but isn't it too bad that giving chase is ALL one can do when one lives in a country that enforces unilateral personal disarmament? Maybe armed and free Englishmen and women would have been able to do more than give chase...would he have been able to "evade" a 9mm so easily?
Do you really want a couple of dozen panicky commuters blasting away in a cross-fire? Sounds like a bad thing to me.
The guys who killed todays' creep absolutely knew what they were doing. They closed with him, grappled and dropped him, two of them held him down so their mate could empty a clip into him downwards, to avoid injuring innocent commuters.
TRIPLE barf
The Muslim Council of Britain needs to realize its in their own interest to become part of the solution ASAP before they learn how bad it will be for them to be seen as part of the problem, stop playing the victim and instead actively help British authorities toss out their community's 'bad apples'.
Good point, I haven't seen a released news piece stating he was muslim...it's as if the Islamic council is assuming terrorists are muslim. Guess I won't argue with them.
This is such a feel-good story!
Call me old-fashioned, but I just love happy endings.
"they pushed him to the floor, bundled on top of him and unloaded five shots into him."
If that's true, doesn't sound like the right way to handle it. Shooting while he's running would've been better IMO.
But I'm shedding Crocodile Tears over it.
*************************************************
Last Updated: Friday, 22 July, 2005, 14:07 GMT 15:07 UK
Will police now shoot to kill?
|
|||||
The Muslim Council of Britain said it was getting calls from Muslims who were "distressed" about the incident at Stockwell Tube station. Roy Ramm, former Met Police specialist operations commander, said the rules for confronting potential suicide bombers had recently changed to "shoot to kill". One terrorism expert said if the shooting was carried out by police - rather than special forces - it would represent a "pretty big departure" for the UK force.
Professor Michael Clarke, professor of defence studies at King's College London, said the officers who carried out the operation in south London were unlikely to be police. 'Head shot'
"These guys may have been some sort of plain clothes special forces," he said. "To have bullets pumped into him like this suggests quite a lot about him and what the authorities, whoever they are, assumed about him.
"The fact that he was shot in this way strongly suggests that it was someone the authorities knew and suspected he was carrying explosives on him." He added: "You don't shoot somebody five times if you think you might have made a mistake and may be able to arrest him." Prof Clarke said police officers were not trained to carry out operations in this way. "Even Special Branch and SO19 (Scotland Yard's armed unit) are not trained to do this sort of thing. "It's plausible that they were special forces or elements of special forces."
Mr Ramm said the danger of shooting a suspected suicide bomber in the body was that it could detonate a bomb they were carrying on them. "The fact is that when you're dealing with suicide bombers they only way you can stop them effectively - and protect yourself - is to try for a head-shot," he said. Former government intelligence analyst Crispin Black agreed there was no other way of stopping someone who was an "immediate threat to life".
Muslims 'jumpy' "It implies that the police knew who he was, it also implies that they considered him an immediate threat to life, under which circumstances they must try and kill somebody...you must shoot to kill." But MCB has urged the police to explain why the man - said to be of Asian appearance - was shot dead. Spokesman Inayat Bunglawala said Muslims he had spoken to this morning were "jumpy and nervous". "I have just had one phone call saying, 'what if I was carrying a rucksack?'. "There may well be reasons why the police felt it necessary to unload five shots into the man and shoot him dead, but they need to make those reasons clear," he said. "We are getting phone calls from quite a lot of Muslims who are distressed about what may be a shoot to kill policy."
|
Just got in. I thought I just heard it reported that the guy shot had nothing to do with the recent bombings. Is this true? Anyone else hear this??
"Perhaps there are certain cultures and different American States, where the crowd pitches in- have not heard of them though."
I think you're correct, most people sit back and watch or run away.
However, not long after 9/11 - that Fall - here in Baltimore I think some guy in a popular bar area tried to molest some girl or something like that. A whole crowd of people turned on him and pummelled him down the street.
My sister thought it was cuz "people aren't going to take any more" after the terrorist attacks. Maybe so, but I haven't heard such stories since!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.