Skip to comments.
NARAL: Roberts Will Overturn Roe v. Wade - ("feminazis" screaming for scalps already!)
NEWSMAX.COM ^
| JULY 19, 2005
| Staff Writers
Posted on 07/19/2005 8:55:06 PM PDT by CHARLITE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
1
posted on
07/19/2005 8:55:09 PM PDT
by
CHARLITE
To: CHARLITE
It just don't get any better than this.
2
posted on
07/19/2005 8:57:19 PM PDT
by
umgud
(Comment removed by poster before moderator could get to it)
To: umgud
Who's got the popcorn? The keg's out back.
3
posted on
07/19/2005 8:58:19 PM PDT
by
steveegg
(Real torture is taking a ride with Sen Ted "Swimmer" Kennedy in a 1968 Oldsmobile off a short bridge)
To: CHARLITE
4
posted on
07/19/2005 9:01:59 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: CHARLITE
Scarborough tonight said the feminists said the same thing about Souter.
To: CHARLITE
I absolutely love the hysterical outcry from the liberals!
Confirmation of the correct, qualified nominee!
6
posted on
07/19/2005 9:02:11 PM PDT
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: CHARLITE
Ir given the opportunity, Yes he will.
We had an election 8 months ago that settled this question, I understand that Liberals are incapable of accepting defeat in any fashion, but the time has come to denounce these Leftists for what they are....
The left will refer to the Abortion issue as "Reproductive Rights" despite the fact that nowhere in the Constitution is it said that the rights of the unborn are not equally protected. This simple fact turns Roe-v-Wade on it's head
7
posted on
07/19/2005 9:02:12 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
(Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
To: CHARLITE
In the immortal words of Slim Pickins YEEEEEeehaaawwww
8
posted on
07/19/2005 9:02:18 PM PDT
by
Cheapskate
(America , -- -- -- -- Yeah!)
To: CHARLITE
Lets see there will be
8 other justices, which means Roberts by himself, doesn't have the power to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Besides, are there no other criteria to appoint a judge, other than 1 or 2 issues?
9
posted on
07/19/2005 9:03:54 PM PDT
by
mountn man
(Everyone brings joy into a room. Some when they enter. Others when they leave)
To: CHARLITE
How would a SCOTUS Justice "work to overturn" any law?
10
posted on
07/19/2005 9:12:55 PM PDT
by
digger48
To: All
To: umgud
"It just don't get any better than this."
The perfect comment on this. I am having a ball. Opened a beer, relaxed, and I went to visit the DUmmies. For highly entertaining reading I recommend a visit. Laughs 'o plenty. Some are foaming at the mouth and dragging out any old info on him they can find to put him in a bad light, some are somber in defeat. But the most telling thing I have been seeing is how they want to fight the nomination for no other purpose then to obstruct. How do you tell when libs are dying? You start to hear the whimpering. You are right, right, right umgod. It just don't get any better than this.
12
posted on
07/19/2005 9:15:55 PM PDT
by
commonasdirt
(Reading DU so you won't hafta)
To: CHARLITE
Sorry, Sweetie-pie, but that's what y'all said about David Souter, and he turns out to be your dream-justice!
Have any of ya heard the tale of the boy who cried "wolf!"??
13
posted on
07/19/2005 9:16:40 PM PDT
by
Redbob
To: steveegg; commonasdirt
I too went to DU...... it's almost as bad as '04 election nite.
14
posted on
07/19/2005 9:17:57 PM PDT
by
umgud
(Comment removed by poster before moderator could get to it)
To: CHARLITE
The League of Baby Killers is upset with the man Bush has chosen to replace O'Conner. So what else is new?
15
posted on
07/19/2005 9:18:23 PM PDT
by
Chewbacca
(My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead, and thats the way I like it!)
To: MJY1288
Like my tagline states. Abortion is not a choice, it's changing ones mind.
The proper time to make the choice is before conception.
16
posted on
07/19/2005 9:19:07 PM PDT
by
mlstier
("Abortion is not a choice. It's changing ones mind.")
To: digger48
How would a SCOTUS Justice "work to overturn" any law?
Shhhhh. You're going to ruin that dramatic 'movie trailer feel' that every leftist special interest group public statement is aiming for.
17
posted on
07/19/2005 9:27:18 PM PDT
by
MitchellC
(Foolishness isn't a mental disorder.)
To: CHARLITE
Question to NARAL and their supporters:
Why is it so important to you to be able to continue to kill babies? Isn't 40 MILLION enough?
18
posted on
07/19/2005 9:30:08 PM PDT
by
G Larry
(Honor the fallen and the heroes of 9/11 at the Memorial Site.)
To: MJY1288
We had an election 8 months ago that settled this question, I understand that Liberals are incapable of accepting defeat in any fashion, but the time has come to denounce these Leftists for what they are....These people are soooo effin perverse. You'd think it might occur to them to actually campaign to get legislation to get what they want instead of cmpaigning to keep the system broken.
They can have anything they want. All they have to do is persuade enough people to support their causes.
19
posted on
07/19/2005 9:35:34 PM PDT
by
papertyger
(Power concedes nothing without a demand. – Frederick Douglass)
To: CHARLITE
What happened to the crazed 'dump Rove' shouting? They stopped instantly. Michael Savage was right. Bush is playing with the minds of the Democrats.
20
posted on
07/19/2005 9:36:21 PM PDT
by
ex-Texan
(Mathew 7:1 through 6)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson