It just don't get any better than this.
Good news!
Scarborough tonight said the feminists said the same thing about Souter.
Confirmation of the correct, qualified nominee!
We had an election 8 months ago that settled this question, I understand that Liberals are incapable of accepting defeat in any fashion, but the time has come to denounce these Leftists for what they are....
The left will refer to the Abortion issue as "Reproductive Rights" despite the fact that nowhere in the Constitution is it said that the rights of the unborn are not equally protected. This simple fact turns Roe-v-Wade on it's head
Besides, are there no other criteria to appoint a judge, other than 1 or 2 issues?
How would a SCOTUS Justice "work to overturn" any law?
Sounds like a plan!
Sorry, Sweetie-pie, but that's what y'all said about David Souter, and he turns out to be your dream-justice!
Have any of ya heard the tale of the boy who cried "wolf!"??
The League of Baby Killers is upset with the man Bush has chosen to replace O'Conner. So what else is new?
Question to NARAL and their supporters:
Why is it so important to you to be able to continue to kill babies? Isn't 40 MILLION enough?
What happened to the crazed 'dump Rove' shouting? They stopped instantly. Michael Savage was right. Bush is playing with the minds of the Democrats.
A sad fact that Democrats refuse to acknowledge is that at least one cause of legal abortion was the eugenics movement from the first part of the last century.
"The eugenics movement sought to limit the reproduction of `inferior' individuals and races, so as to prevent the lowering of the national intelligence in future generations. Planned Parenthood was founded not simply as an organization for limiting the size of families in general but particularly to reduce the reproduction of the black population in the United States, as Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger herself noted."
From Thomas Sowell's book "Black Rednecks and White Liberals, 'Germans and History" p. 193.
Draw your own conclusions as to why this observation was placed in a largely complimentary chapter on Germans, their culture and place in world history.
Moonbats. Barking moonbats.
So what if the court does overturn Roe v. Wade? Nothing will change. The states will dutifully come up with their own laws, as it should be. Those women who are in a raging hurry to snuff the lives of their unborn needn't worry... under state law, their decision (crime? sin?) will be protected.
These people will never support Bush anyway, so why even pander to them?
You don't say....?
Now, Luttig for Chief Justice, and Pryor to replace Ginsburg or Stevens.
Smart move. Place an ultra-conservative that is unknown, yet approved, by the Senate in the past. Roe vs. Wade a big deal now. The Lieberals are already sweating. Let them try a filibuster. Set the "nuclear option" into play and punt. Next, here comes Reinquist. He will announce his retirement and Bush will nominate a conservative woman. Two for the price of one. All this to save America and the Lieberals forgot about Rove!!!!