Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

STATEMENT BY SENATOR EDWARD M. KENNEDY ON NOMINATION OF JOHN ROBERTS TO U.S. SUPREME COURT
SENATOR EDWARD M. KENNEDY ^ | July 19, 2005 | EDWARD M. KENNEDY

Posted on 07/19/2005 7:04:08 PM PDT by mdittmar

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Laura Capps/Melissa Wagoner (202) 224-2633 This is a critical moment for this country¹s future. If John Roberts is confirmed, he will have a vital role in setting the direction of the country for generations to come.

The Supreme Court is often the last line of defense for the freedoms and liberties for hundreds of millions of Americans. Few responsibilities of the Senate are more important than reviewing the qualifications of nominees for the Supreme Court. Every Senator, Republican or Democrats, has a responsibility to determine whether Mr. Roberts deserves to join the currently closely divided court when so much is at stake. It¹s wrong for any Senator to be a rubberstamp.

All of us in the Senate who have been through this process know the importance of this process. Every American ought to be asking some tough questions right now about whether Mr. Roberts is fit to serve on the highest court in the land.

Will he protect average Americans when their rights are abused by powerful corporations?

Will he ensure that private companies aren¹t allowed to pollute our rivers and lakes and our air?

Will he protect and preserve the progress we¹ve made on equal opportunity and fairness for all Americans?

Will he separate his personal ideology from the rule of law and protect the rights and freedoms of all Americans, not just the powerful or the wealthy.

Justice O¹Connor set a high standard. She tried to bring the nation together, and she respected the Constitution. She was a mainstream conservative who used her ability and respect for the rule of law to find solutions that would strengthen us as a nation, as the Constitution intended.

Mr. Roberts must demonstrate that he meets that standard before the American people, and he will have an opportunity to do so before the Senate Judiciary Committee before the coming weeks.

No nominee, especially a nominee who is well known to have argued ideological positions on issues important to the American people, should be confirmed without full and candid disclosure and discussion of those positions and their importance to him.

I welcome the opportunity to question Mr. Roberts, and believe that the American people will know at the end of this process whether he should advance to the Supreme Court.

We have a responsibility to the Constitution and to the American people and their children and grandchildren to get this right.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blahblahblah; fatdrunkstupid; noise; roberts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2005 7:04:12 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

What does Sen. Kennedy capitalize his middle initial, but not the first letters of his first and last name? Is it a secret code?


2 posted on 07/19/2005 7:05:29 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Democrats ... frolicking on the wilder shores of Planet Zongo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Will he leave a girl to die and run away like a coward?


3 posted on 07/19/2005 7:06:12 PM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
What does Sen. Kennedy capitalize his middle initial, but not the first letters of his first and last name? Is it a secret code?

I think this is a sign of (proper) disrespect by the poster.....

4 posted on 07/19/2005 7:06:43 PM PDT by Yossarian (Remember: NOT ALL HEART ATTACKS HAVE TRADITIONAL SYMPTOMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Mr. Roberts will shred these clowns.


5 posted on 07/19/2005 7:06:49 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Carry Daily, Apply Sparingly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Hey Lard Ass, isn't it took you sucked on a few bottles and took a drive?


6 posted on 07/19/2005 7:07:14 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Will he protect average Americans when their rights are abused by powerful corporations?

What about, "Will he protect average Americans from having their homes ripped away from them by powerful governments and given to powerful corporations?"

7 posted on 07/19/2005 7:07:17 PM PDT by sportutegrl (People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

I'm sure The Swimmer had to merely fill in the name on this standardized Democrat form.


8 posted on 07/19/2005 7:07:29 PM PDT by Big Giant Head (I should change my tagline to "Big Giant Pancake on my Head")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Do you think this was a macro and that they just filled in the nominee's name?

And don't you think we should all send Teddy an anniversary card?


9 posted on 07/19/2005 7:07:40 PM PDT by Howlin (Is Valerie Plame a mute?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Yeah...I'll bet he just sat down and wrote this. What a tool!


10 posted on 07/19/2005 7:07:47 PM PDT by True_wesT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

Ah, that kind of secret code. It was the middle initial that threw me off.


11 posted on 07/19/2005 7:07:48 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Democrats ... frolicking on the wilder shores of Planet Zongo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
No nominee, especially a nominee who is well known to have argued ideological positions on issues important to the American people, should be confirmed without full and candid disclosure and discussion of those positions and their importance to him.

IOW: We will throw a tantrum because our definition of a "centrist" is Karl Marx.

12 posted on 07/19/2005 7:07:57 PM PDT by Shazbot29 (If you paid attention you'd be worried, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Frankly, it should not matter what a single Democrat thinks about Roberts, as they are the minority party, and should not be able to weild any power over this process.

But alas, the GOP is in charge, so that means the victors must give way to the defeated.


13 posted on 07/19/2005 7:08:35 PM PDT by Dolphan (God Bless our Military and their families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Sen. Kennedy, you want to know if he'll lean to your side? I have one question for you --

Do cars float?


14 posted on 07/19/2005 7:08:35 PM PDT by scott7278 (Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I would like to know what we are talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Will he protect average Americans....



Today is an anniversary, Teddy. Remember? We do.

15 posted on 07/19/2005 7:09:02 PM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Will he be the type of guy that can go out drinking with me and do the "waitress sandwich" at a restaurant?

I don't think so, Teddy. You're in a fine place to judge his qualifications, ain't ya?


16 posted on 07/19/2005 7:09:23 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (As long as Dean's the head of the D-N-C, it just looks better for the G-O-P!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Will he have a national holiday when this POS dies?


17 posted on 07/19/2005 7:09:24 PM PDT by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Another weasely statement, far less confrontational than Schumer, who specifically pointed out that he opposed Roberts' nomination to the D.C. Circuit in committee.

Translation: he'll complain, then he'll let him get a vote.


18 posted on 07/19/2005 7:09:26 PM PDT by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
PLEASE IGNORE THIS POST. MR. KENNEDY IS AN IDIOT AND SHOULD BE THOUGHT AS INCONSEQUENTIAL.
19 posted on 07/19/2005 7:09:30 PM PDT by llevrok (Semper Conservatatis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

They are going to try to "Bork" Roberts.

The writing is on the wall and everyone needs to come to this battle loaded for a long tough fight.

President Bush has made a gutsy and great choice. I hope none of us let him down


20 posted on 07/19/2005 7:09:40 PM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson