Posted on 07/19/2005 3:03:17 PM PDT by Checkers
"That is who I am thinking too...I keep getting the two Ediths mixed up...Clement is the more libertarian one and Jones is the more social-conservative one?"
If they get on the Court, ask me in a couple of years!
lol
You may be right, but I can just see the Democrats and their "moderate" lapdogs telling us that "She has not had enough years on the appeals court."
Because they delayed her confirmation for two or three years.
"Of course, the hard liberals like Boxer and Kennedy would likely still attempt a filibuster even if it is a suicidal one (if they aren't even close to the required votes)..."
La-oo-oo-oo-oosss-ssss-ssers!
"Call forwarding?"
"cell phone"
Anyone here following tradesports? I shorted Edith Jones at 54 and she's down to 36. I bought Miguel Estrada at 0.50. If he gets picked my $2.00 becomes $400!
They definatly do, I prefer Luttig, in that he is 50 years old I think and in good health, and a solid conservative, I'm not as sure about Roberts yet.
Luttig is 51; Roberts is 49.
Edith Clement has written on the subject of abortion rights that Roe is settled law. If that's what her current views are now, there will be hell to pay if Bush nominates her..
Sadly, Ginsberg was "foisted" on us by one of our own conservatives, Orrin Hatch (friend of mine sent me this):
http://thinkprogress.org/2005/07/01/how-clinton-treated-hatch/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.