Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem; Dog; Blurblogger; WOSG; wretchard; section9; Nick Danger; Travis McGee; Squantos; ...

The article omits numerous things. First of all, we've got more than just the 18 missile interceptors in Alaska and California (plus one "test" interceptor in Alabama). That's just the land-based part of our National Missile Defense system.

We've also got Aegis destroyers and SM-3 anti-missiles at sea. At least two of those systems are off the coast of North Korea at this very moment.

In addition to all of that, we've got one Boeing airborne laser interceptor...as well as armed UAV's that can take out enemy missile launches in the first 30 seconds (the time it takes to reach Mach 1) of firing. These systems can down enemy missiles while they are still over enemy airspace.

Put together in sum, those 3 phases of our missile defense constitute a viable, if not perfect, defense system.

Also, it's no accident that we've put 18 land-based interceptors into operation so quickly. That happens to be the exact number of Chinese nuclear ICBM's at the moment.

Thus, we've fundamentally altered their military options and calculations from this time 5 years ago.

7 posted on 07/17/2005 8:23:38 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Southack; Jeff Head
Also, it's no accident that we've put 18 land-based interceptors into operation so quickly. That happens to be the exact number of Chinese nuclear ICBM's at the moment.

HEY !....Quit scare'n my kittens !.......:o)

8 posted on 07/17/2005 8:27:10 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Southack

I thought the Chinese had around 40 ICBMs?


11 posted on 07/17/2005 8:29:35 PM PDT by xrp (Fox News Channel should rename itself the Missing Persons Network)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Southack
These systems can down enemy missiles while they are still over enemy airspace.

That's the part I like.  Let them deal with the effects of a destroyed ICBM overhead.

51 posted on 07/18/2005 3:16:58 AM PDT by I_dmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson