Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 17 July 2005
Various big media television networks ^ | 17 July 2005 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 07/17/2005 5:41:23 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, July 17th, 2005

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sens. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., and Mary Landrieu, D-La.; Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper; Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman; Center for American Progress president John Podesta; Watergate reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): > Former Ambassador Joseph Wilson; Sens. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Pre-empted for coverage of the British Open golf tournament.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Lt. Gen. David Petraeus, commander of the Multinational Security Transition Command in Iraq; Sens. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Joseph Biden, D-Del.; Mehlman; Harvard Law School professor Laurence Tribe; former Attorney General Richard Thornburgh.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; facethenation; foxnewssunday; guests; lateedition; lineup; matthewcooper; meetthepress; mtp; sunday; talkshows; thisweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 721-730 next last
To: sanjacjake

Amen.


461 posted on 07/17/2005 9:37:06 AM PDT by fox0566
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
Wow. We are going to hear about Deepthroat?

Now you know it is a media requirement that every time there is the slightest scandal, Woodward and Bernstein MUST be trotted out to pronounce, "No, this is NOT as big as (our scandal) Watergate."

462 posted on 07/17/2005 9:37:42 AM PDT by Howlin (Is Valerie Plame a mute?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody
VALERIE PLAME WAS NOT A COVERT AGENT.

As I understand it, there might be a technicality involved. Plame was withdrawn from overseas covert work when her cover (and she was never more than "light cover" as opposed to "deep cover") was blown or was suspected to be blown back in the 90s (I've seen a couple of different years named).

However, I have the impression from things I've read that the CIA never changed her listed agency status (NOC, but I forget what it stands for) -- sloppy record-keeping at best. If anyone can confirm or deny or expand, I would appreciate it.

463 posted on 07/17/2005 9:38:11 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

Russert was on vacation for a reason...he's in this too.


464 posted on 07/17/2005 9:38:39 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

I was laughing out loud at Laura's take on the BBC broadcasters...

BTW, I didn't watch Fox Sunday, because I always watch the rerun, so I concentrated on MTP and (yuck)Face the Nation...

I only saw one mention of what Jane Harman said---and the poster mentioned just that she is NOT in favor of immigration reform.

I DO NOT want this to turn into a "border control" thread, but I am really curious about why she is against it...and any other freepers thoughts on that..


465 posted on 07/17/2005 9:38:42 AM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: snugs
What is grey poupon?


466 posted on 07/17/2005 9:40:49 AM PDT by Capn TrVth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: anita

And Cavuto


467 posted on 07/17/2005 9:42:33 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (I - LOVE - my attitude problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: Capn TrVth

Admitting to eating french food LOL


468 posted on 07/17/2005 9:43:20 AM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver
this is why a lawyer will not ask some specific questions of a defendant

Exactly. At a law firm where I worked as a paralegal, the montly staff meetings were generally devoted to some kind of "lesson." At one, a litigation advised attorneys with no experience in criminal law how to proceed if they had to "hold the fort" (e.g., midnight call from a client whose teen-age was picked up for drunk driving) until a criminal attorney could be retained. Never ask: "What happened? What did you do?" Always ask: "What do the police say happened? What do the police think you did?"

In my observation, though, lying to or even misleading a judge you're appearing before is pretty risky, even when not under oath. (Not to say it isn't done; it can be a fine line.)

469 posted on 07/17/2005 9:43:40 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: maryz

IMHO, once a covert or not so covert, i.e., Valerie Plame, marries an overt agent, i.e., senior diplomat Joseph Wilson, her usefulness as an agent is blown. Any intelligence agency worth its salt would immediately do a background on her. I bet the Mossad has a file on her, given her involvement in WMD and Iraq. I assume they also have one on Mr. Wilson and his business dealings with African leaders and Turkey.

I am waiting for the SP. Without more facts all we are doing is speculating.


470 posted on 07/17/2005 9:44:16 AM PDT by bjc (Check the data!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

The far left niche media. (beyond CNN, BBC, and the foreign press) is already there with a vengence.

They are pushing their goebles guru Mr. Lakoff to regurgitate these points exactly.

These talking points are already part of leftist talk radio and leftist local access TV.


471 posted on 07/17/2005 9:44:24 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody
I like Cavuto also I always remember his interview of the VP after the Leahey incident he allowed the VP to admit he had said what he had without actually saying he had a brilliant bit of interviewing.
472 posted on 07/17/2005 9:45:03 AM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: snugs
We have a talk show host here in the U.S., Laura Ingraham, who did about 30 minutes one day last week imitating BBC broadcasterettes and the way they were describing what we see n the US as terrorists as "Bombers", it was quite the thing, but I fully see your point.

Grey Poupon is a type of tangy mustard, and I can't get it out of my keyboard. May have to take this thing outside and hose it off.

I may take a nap or have a mango dacquri.
473 posted on 07/17/2005 9:45:16 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU and all Mosques in the US,UK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: maryz

It is similar here in Britain if a client admits to an offence to his lawyer then he cannot defend him


474 posted on 07/17/2005 9:47:05 AM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
The MSM is supposed to REPORT the news, not MAKE it.

The false meme that the media's role is to objectively report was planted by the media. It puts the institution in a superior postion (i.e., "elite" as are government officials, as opposed to "the ignorant masses") that would not exist but for their creation of it.

But there never was such a thing as an objective media. The media has always manufactured news to suit its objectives. We'd be better off with openly partisan media, where the public has to make up its mind based on widely diverging presentations.

DING-DING-DING!! We have a winner!

Hooray, someone finally hits the mark. This "meme" started just before "Camelot", when the beginnings of the MSM began feeling their oats. (I suspect that having Harry and Dwight in the WH delayed the start, but I could be wrong)

Someone recently mentioned the Pentagon Papers, and noted that JFKennedy used assassination of foreign leaders as U.S. Policy, and nobody to this day has called anyone on it. If they'd done it to Truman or Eisenhower, someone would still be breaking rocks in Leavenworth.

(Oh, god, I got a thrill at the thought of fat Timmy or Steffie swingin' a 20-lb sledge in the Kansas sun ... )

475 posted on 07/17/2005 9:47:37 AM PDT by Right Winged American (No matter how Cynical I get, I just can't keep up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative

Actually, I agree with what you posted...

I think the reason this has been brought up is because the economy is doing a lot better than expected, the London bombings have steered people back to Pres. Bush re: secuity, and since Pres. Bush hasn't named a nominee for SCOTUS, yet...

they had to find something to distract people from good news...I also feel that one reason the Schumer and Wilson had the press conference, and have been on these talk shows is...

IF some indictments are handed down, and two of them end up in the Wilsons hands....they can scream that his is pay-back for Wilson and Schumer going on TV, etc.,...


476 posted on 07/17/2005 9:47:52 AM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: fox0566

Thanks


477 posted on 07/17/2005 9:48:36 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (I - LOVE - my attitude problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

I understand this as well. I've commented for years that if the bar does not clean up its act, voters will do it for them. Which is why there's more of a desire by the public to institute loser-pays and tort reform.

I still believe the US justice system is the best in the world, but that does not mean we don't have problems that need addressing to make it better. Rules of Evidence for another.

The biggest improvement for justice will be continued appointments of conservatives to the bench, and Bush getting a conservative/originalist/constitutionalist to the Supreme Court. (I fell out of my chair listening to Mary Landau saying Democrats didn't want judges who make laws sitting on the bench, but that she wanted a justice who would interpret the law instead.)


478 posted on 07/17/2005 9:48:41 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas
Orrin Hatch doing a good job on CNN right now- teeling it like it is:

People questioning why Plumes wife was an operative-

Wilson is a liar-

This is nothing more then the left trying to get back at Rove who has destroyed them-

Nothing but political BS-

Plagiarist Joe Biden saying this is about honor-
479 posted on 07/17/2005 9:48:53 AM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
It's got to be the Mexicon vote thing. It's the only thing that makes sense. But at what cost. Don't these congress critters realize that the country's security and safety is at stake with open borders.

Like you, I could not stop laughing last week. Laura has some real talents, irregardless of her personal circumstances as well. A true sign of an excellent broadcaster. Laura and Tony Snow.
480 posted on 07/17/2005 9:49:27 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU and all Mosques in the US,UK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 721-730 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson