Who Exposed Secret Agent Plame? ^ |
||
Posted by nativesoutherner On News/Activism ^ 07/15/2005 1:54:27 PM CDT · 57 replies · 1,970+ views National Review ^ | 7-15-05 | Clifford D. May From National Review this AM. Could be.... http://www.nationalreview.com |
||
|
||
Who Exposed Secret Agent Plame? ^ |
||
Posted by Renfield On News/Activism ^ 07/15/2005 7:57:36 AM CDT · 63 replies · 1,454+ views National Review Online ^ | 7-15-05 | Clifford D. May This just in: Bob Novak did not reveal that Valerie Plame was an undercover agent for the CIA. Read or reread his column from July 14, 2003. All Novak reports is that the wife of former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson is an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction. Novak has said repeatedly that he was not told, and that he did not know, that Plame was or had ever been a NOC, an agent with Non-Official Cover. He has emphatically said that had he understood that she was any sort of secret agent, he would... |
I want to see Plames W-2 forms for the past 12 years.
Wilson, Corn--man, dems are a bunch of crybabies.
Kinda makes ya think that reporters' sources aren't the real interest of the grand jury, huh?
As far as Corn is concerned I can't take him seriously until he grows an upper lip. Just how well does he know Barney Frank anyway?!
That number will probably change, David.
David Corn is a smarmy obnoxious putz.
I change channels every time he is on.
Do us a service SP and put him away.
Again, as noted by others elsewhere, IF there was any real smoking gun against Rove, it WOULD have been used before the November 2004 election.
The Leftist desperate grasping at straws continues....
Why is Cornhole part of the White House Press Corps, getting cheap shots at McClellan??
I thought gay men who wrote for partisan papers were forbidden.
Maybe I'm just slow today but I read a post about May's column, with some quotes, and it made no sense. I hope the article made more sense in it's entirety.
And no-one needs to feel obligated to ping me to numerous articles about this nothing story.
No one broke the law so I'm sticking with my previous statement; who cares.
Why bother? It was obvious Wilson was the leaker to Corn.
David cornholes himself:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1444282/posts
Corn is clueless. The leaker is the one who first reports the "secret" to someone else. In this case, Corn was the someone else.
Also, was it just gossip, reading that Valerie Plame was dating Joe Wilson while he was still married?
Hasn't Corn learned the rules? Wilson's got dibs on complaining about being smeared.
A Limerick about Joe Wilson: PerfidiaJoe took the Islamicists' side,
When he said that the President lied.
Since the Times spread Joe's tale,
Please put them in jail
And, certainly, Joe should be fried
bump
For the record, or at least Mr. Wilson's version of the record:
"In February (2003), I had lunch with David Corn, the articulate and determined critic of the war. I had become acquainted with him when we kept bumping into each other in the "green room" at Fox. I shared with him my concerns about the imperial nature of the administration's drive to war, and he asked me to write an article for the Nation. He felt my "establishment" credentials would lend credibility to the point of view espoused by the magazine - a point of view I hasten to add, that, by and large, I had come to share. I agreed and the piece, entitled "Republic or Empire," was published in mid-February."
Page 318, The Politics of Truth
So let's see, Corn talks to Wilson long before Novak writes anything: Corn is interested in Wilson's "establishment" credentials. This occurs long before Wilson's NYT piece and before Novak's column.
Seems to me that part of Wilson's establishment credentials would have been that his wife had an inside view of where Iraq was on WMD. Over drinks at lunch, don't you think?
A blurb for a talk show Corn is on tonight shows him saying that Rove twice passed on classified information about Valerie (I think we are calling her "Wilson" now).
I'd watch the show, except that Corn is, to me, like fingernails on a chalkboard. I can't take it.
I guess he thinks if he says it enough, some people will believe it. Maybe so, but those are all confirmed Libs, anyway.