Posted on 07/15/2005 10:25:17 PM PDT by Williams
Ever read Terry Brooks?
_______________
I read one of his books in the late 70s. I was coming right off my first read of LotR, and it suffered a bit in the comparison.
Great book!
My first thought was Mugabe...
The only thing more enjoyable than a new Harry Potter book is the fervor of the anti-Potters.
My favorite was when they mistook a story from the Onion as truth rather than satire about kids forming covens after reading Harry Potter books.
yep, It was a good book. Did you also read Black Unicorn? :D
Are you kidding?
Quit using an ambigious statement in a book as a template statement on policy. Could it be the persident of Romania? How about the president of South Africa?
Nah - the evil schoolmarm in the pink sweater plotting to take over Hogwarts is Hillary.
Here's the timeline of the Potter books:
Book 1, 1991
Book 2, 1992
Book 3, 1993
Book 4, 1994
Book 5, 1995
Book 6, 1996
Book 7, 1997
Well said.
ping
Yes, his name is Mad Ivan :)
It's not hysteria and it's not a battle. I like the books, I even generally like J K Rowling. And yes she left it vague enough that some of you can say it's South Africa. But when one speaks of a British Prime Minister awaiting a call from a "president" of a "far distant country" one does not think of South Africa. One thinks of the U.S. And the reference to the call is totally gratuitous, it is merely what the Prime Minister is waiting for when something else happens. Making the reference to the president as a "wretched man" even more gratuitous. Reality is it is a veiled jab at our president on the first page, and the liberal elite will love her for it.
Yup. I actually started it first then quickly realized it was a sequel and had to go track down Magic Kingdom. I haven't read the next three though. My fiction reading dropped off sharply about 15 years ago too.
Comic fantasy & sci-fi is a great way to waste time though! =)
Howlin, we agree! Good, pithy comment.
Yes the timeline is facinating, but I do not think she was referencing Bill Clinton in a book she knew she was publishing in July, 2005. If I discover she's a conservative and wanted to unleash her feelings about Clinton 5 years after the fact, I'll apologize in due course. But if you think she randomly decided to refer to the "president" of a "far distant country" as a "wretched man" on the first page, that's as big a fairy tale as Harry Potter. By the way, I enjoyed the chapter anyway. I am not on a jihad against Harry Potter, but her reference was deliberate. Even obvious.
And FYI, she was concerned about having an American director, because her books are VERY British and she wants top keep the movies the same as the books. Obviously, she was correct in thinking that perhaps an American ( YOU ! ), would see an English concept through American eyes and get it all bollixed up.
Those books are crap..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.