Skip to comments.
Joe Wilson's Credibility Problem
Front Page Magazine,com ^
| July 15, 2005
| Joel Mowbray
Posted on 07/15/2005 7:33:57 AM PDT by YaYa123
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
1
posted on
07/15/2005 7:33:57 AM PDT
by
YaYa123
To: StarFan; SuzanneC
I really enjoyed reading this one!
2
posted on
07/15/2005 7:35:39 AM PDT
by
YaYa123
(@All's Right With My World.com)
To: YaYa123
I really think this thing is gonna backfire on the 'Rats...
3
posted on
07/15/2005 7:35:55 AM PDT
by
ErnBatavia
(Like a fool, I looked up from 'neath the tree as the bird chirped...Vogelspooren)
To: YaYa123
Theres just one hitch: their entire political case rests on the quicksand known as Joe Wilson. And the Dems and the Liberal media are all too willing to sink in the quicksand with Wilson, as long as they go down swinging.
4
posted on
07/15/2005 7:36:59 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: YaYa123
FOX News just had a round table discussion about the latest developments.
Even the liberal on the panel concurred that this dog won't hunt for the Democrats and the MSM anymore, but don't expect them to unlock their jaws until reality really sinks in.
![](http://www.gazeta.ru/files/224559/disappointment.jpg)
They invested their souls and emotions into this manufactured scandal, and they are like a kid who woke up on Christmas morning and discovered he received clothes from Aunt Grace instead of a BB gun.
5
posted on
07/15/2005 7:38:37 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
(Eliminate, eradicate, and stamp out redundancy!)
To: YaYa123
Since the libs are the minion of 'the father of lies', it goes to reason they would back Wilson.
It's so disgusting to use our taxpayer dollars for their fancies and trival slander/outright lies.
6
posted on
07/15/2005 7:39:07 AM PDT
by
AliVeritas
(Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
To: YaYa123
7
posted on
07/15/2005 7:39:16 AM PDT
by
rellimpank
(urbanites don' t understand the cultural deprivation of not being raised on a farm:NRABenefactor)
To: YaYa123
Why the euphemisms? Joe Wilson is a lying sack of crap who wants to sell books and be a hero on the liberal cocktail party circuit. He thought John Kerry was going to be president and he would have a cushy White House job with lots of perks and party invitations.
If you asked me to trade places to day with Joe Wilson or Karl Rove, I know which one I would pick.
8
posted on
07/15/2005 7:40:05 AM PDT
by
Dems_R_Losers
(If the WMD intelligence was so bad, why does Valerie Plame still have a job?)
To: YaYa123
More and more, I believe that Rove knows exactly what is going on and there is a trap to be sprung here somewhere. It may be that Miller and Cooper know the truth also and that truth points right back to the MSM as the culprits.
Something doesn't add up when Miller didn't even write an article and she is the one in jail. There must be more to that story.
Maybe this is wishful thinking, but when all is said and done, this may end up being a case of one hand of the MSM not knowing what the other was doing. I can imagine as the calls for an investigation were being trumpeted by most in the MSM, those in the know (Miller, Cooper, etc), might have been quietly saying, ix-nay on the call-for-an-investigation-nay.
I think the Dems have brought their own rope and Rove is happy to let them hang themselves.
9
posted on
07/15/2005 7:41:27 AM PDT
by
Pete
To: YaYa123
The goal of the Lefties might really be to make sure Rove has no access to classified information.Imagine Bolton at the UN, nosing around for information on the Oil For food Scandal, and no one is allowed to discuss this with Rove.
Imagine selecting candidates for the USSC and Rove is not allowed to see any background information on them..
10
posted on
07/15/2005 7:41:33 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Imagine the team of Rove and Bolton, having access to classified info on the Oil for Food scandal)
To: YaYa123
This Jack@$$ ought to be investigated for fraud at the very least. Or maybe I'll go on a self appointed fact finding mission at the publics expense.
To: Pete
The biggest question in this whole thing is who is Miller protecting?
Rove gave a blanket waiver to ANYONE he spoke with, so it is clear that Miller is not trying to protect Rove. And ther is no way the NYTimes would try to protect Rove.
So who is she protecting? Wilson?
12
posted on
07/15/2005 7:43:43 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: YaYa123
From the article you referenced, the crux of the matter: Todays New York Times reports...Novak testified that he called Rove just as Cooper had and that Rove did not give any indication that Plame was undercover. The Times further reports that Novak testified Bushs right-hand man was merely his second source. If true, this explodes the Lefts theory that Rove was shopping the story for any willing taker.
13
posted on
07/15/2005 7:46:06 AM PDT
by
Wolfstar
(The Dim Party and its fellow leftist travelers want nothing less than the fall of the United States.)
To: syriacus
Your theory is possible but I think the dems are not that nuanced. Their attacks tend to be more ham-handed. They see Rove as the reason they are losing elections (note, they are still in denial thinking that Rove is "tricking" the majority of the voting public) and if they can get rid of him, their political fortunes will change.
If they somehow were able to get Rove out (which will never happen), imagine their crushing suprise at their next defeat at the polls. Maybe, then, they would face the fact that the problem is in the mirror and not in some political genious boogeyman.
14
posted on
07/15/2005 7:46:51 AM PDT
by
Pete
To: Pete
Their attacks tend to be more ham-handed.True.
15
posted on
07/15/2005 7:49:00 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Imagine the team of Rove and Bolton, having access to classified info on the Oil for Food scandal)
To: YaYa123
Thanks mucho.
The Times further reports that Novak testified Bushs right-hand man was merely his SECOND SOURCE. If true, this explodes the Lefts theory that Rove was shopping the story for any willing taker. It also adds credence to the likelihood that he had no clue Plames status at the CIA.
So we have Novak and Rove testifying that the name was out there prior to their conversation and we have Novak and Cooper testifying THEY called Rove. Any wonder why ALL the morning talk shows didn't report this.
If I have time I think I'll ask my Senator for an explanation since he embarrassed me to no end yesterday.
16
posted on
07/15/2005 7:49:01 AM PDT
by
StarFan
To: 1Old Pro
Rove: "They've got me surrounded...the poor bastards."
17
posted on
07/15/2005 7:49:29 AM PDT
by
Stand W
(Confusion to our enemies)
To: Phantom Lord
So who is she protecting? Wilson? We'll soon find out, unless she pulls a Susan McDougal
18
posted on
07/15/2005 7:51:33 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
We'll soon find out, unless she pulls a Susan McDougal Let's hope she doesn't "pull" a Jim McDougal.
19
posted on
07/15/2005 7:53:54 AM PDT
by
Pete
To: Dems_R_Losers
Was Wilson under oath when he testified to the Senate Committee? If so, then why in the hell has he NOT been charged with PERJURY?
Anyone who needs to go to jail is Wilson and his minions like chucky, dean, and the reast of the Socialist in America! Clearly Wilson and his gang conspired to unseat a sitting President of the United States, using the CIA and lies to accomplish this criminal feat!
20
posted on
07/15/2005 7:57:18 AM PDT
by
standing united
(82nd ABN 1/508th BN Bco 1st Sqd. Alpha Fireteam Leader: "fury from the sky" 8-Duce on the Loose!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson