To: macsmind76
I can't believe you don't "get it". She was undercover when Rove talked about her, but not when Joe Wilson did. Even if Joe talks about her before Rove, she is not undercover. Then she becomes undercover again, the second before Rove or someone talks about her. It's like a superpower or something. It's very cool. I'm undercover, now I'm not, oh wait, now I am again. Can't you see that?
6 posted on
07/14/2005 8:20:26 PM PDT by
jsk10
To: jsk10
Wow, I 'get it' now, but I'm dizzy and nauseous.
To: jsk10
Joe's book says they returned from overseas in 1997. If she was "covert", by January 2003, the statute ran on her coverage under the IIP Act.
Joe's a guy who used specific language for 20 years and if he's that dumb to not understand the act and it's definition of Covert AGent, then the taxpayers deserve a 20 year refund from Crazy Joe.
15 posted on
07/14/2005 8:24:12 PM PDT by
Doctor Raoul
(Support Our Troops, Spit On A Liberal Reporter)
To: jsk10; Chieftain
It's beginning to be like "Wilson's undercover wife" is like the "thing" that Steve Martin on SNL would look at and say
"What IS..that? WHAT..is that? What is ..THAT?"
16 posted on
07/14/2005 8:24:59 PM PDT by
Recovering Ex-hippie
(Everything I need to know about Islam I learned on 9-11!)
To: jsk10
Then she becomes undercover again, the second before Rove or someone talks about her. It's like a superpower or something.She's like Wilson's shadow. He can't step on her, but Rove did. Apparently. Somehow.
To: jsk10
It's like a superpower or something. It's very cool. I'm undercover, now I'm not, oh wait, now I am again. Can't you see that?
Outstanding - and your superhero name is...Arbitrary Standards Man?
30 posted on
07/14/2005 8:46:46 PM PDT by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: jsk10
She was undercover, then she is undercover.
Dems really have problems with the meaning of the word "is"
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson