Posted on 07/14/2005 1:50:45 PM PDT by Pukin Dog
Dont ask me, because you know I wont tell you how I came across this information.
Here is the scoop.
This is all about the Supreme Court.
With the knowledge that Rove was Matthew Coopers background source regarding the Plame incident, no matter the fact that no laws were broken, the Democrats leaped upon the matter as a way for Democrats and the MSM to possibly prevent Bush from changing the makeup of the Supreme Court. Under normal circumstances, Democrats cannot stop Bush from reshaping the Supreme Court, and that has Democrats terrified. They cannot sustain a Filibuster without Frist invoking the Nuclear Option on them, so they only have one last option, which is now underway.
The Democrats must demonize Bush to the degree that they can then begin their long-awaited impeachment articles, with the MSM in tow. If Congress can introduce articles of impeachment against Bush, then the MSM will demand that Bush postpone any nominations to the Supreme Court until the matter is decided. It is the only hope they have left of preventing a Conservative Supreme Court from taking hold, and if they do not accomplish this, the flow of money into Democratic coffers will stop instantaneously.
Next week, you will begin to hear Democrats suggesting that if Bush does not fire Karl Rove, then he is guilty of Obstruction of Justice and Lying to the American People in order to protect a friend. The Media will play along dutifully, because it was there idea in the first place.
Forget about Judith Miller.
Because the Special Prosecutor has asked the White House not to discuss the matter, no one will be able to inform Miller or the NY Times on how Miller should lie to save herself. Without that knowledge, the Times will not let her testify at all. They are paying her to be silent, and it is they who are actually guilty of Obstruction of Justice Miller knows who the leaker is, and you all know who I believe that person to be.
What you all are about to see, is the most coordinated, vicious attack ever in the history of Politics against this administration, because those involved have everything at stake. Without control of the Supreme Court, the Liberal agenda is dead for the next 30-40 years. All of their Environmental nonsense, Abortion, Private Property, Affirmative Action and Civil Rights issues go right down the tubes.
The Bush Administration is aware of what is to come, and might be able to prevent it with a little inside baseball but the looniest on the left will attempt this no matter what the outcome.
Expect editorials next week, arguing whether or not it is fair for a president who stole the first election and won the second election by the smallest margin of any incumbent President who is embroiled in a National Security Scandal to be deciding on the makeup of the Supreme Court. At the same time, Liberal Senators will begin to suggest that Conformation hearings on anyone Bush selects should be postponed until the investigations are over. Unfortunately for our side, they have an alley in one Arlen Specter. They will be leaning heavily on him to go along with delayed hearings. Specter is already angry with Bush over the Stem-cell research issue.
Will it work? No. Why? Because Bush understands the law, and also understands (with Roves help) that no matter how loud and long the Democrats scream, they and the MSM really cant do anything about the Supreme Court, but can effect public opinion. Bush, by telling Republicans to shut up about his choice, has set precedent for when he tells (by his Supreme Court selections) the Democrats the same thing. If he ignores both sides, he can just choose who he wants, and that is exactly what he will do.
So get ready for an ugly, ugly Summer and Fall. Dont expect to hear much from Bush on Rove, or the Courts after he makes his selections. Republicans in Congress will also be silent (except Specter and Hagel) and will not risk their own re-elections and legacies to side with Democrats this time round.
So there it is, take it or leave it. I wont answer any questions about how or where I got the information, so dont ask me.
-PD
Exactly... "Blood in the water!" It'll just whet their appetites.
Mark
bttt
And Fitzgerald has a bone to pick with her, after she tipped off the Holy Land Foundation before he was about to raid it. She is the target of this investigation, I have no doubt about it.
"After being exposed in the international press, French intelligence can hardly be amused or happy with him," one western diplomat said. "Martino may have thought the safest thing was to hand himself over to the Italians." Investigators in Rome suspect that Mr Martino was first engaged by the French secret services five years ago, when he was asked to investigate rumours of illicit trafficking in uranium from Niger. He is thought to have then been retained the following year to collect more information. It was then that he is suspected of having assembled a dossier containing both real and bogus documents from Niger, the latter apparently forged by a diplomat.
In September 2002 Tony Blair accused Saddam of seeking "significant quantities" of uranium from an undisclosed African country - in fact, Niger. US President George W Bush made a similar claim in his State of the Union address to Congress four months later, using information supplied by MI6.
The International Atomic Energy Agency expressed doubts over some of the documents' authenticity, however, and declared them false in March 2003.
In July, the White House withdrew the president's claim, admitting that it was based on inaccurate information. British officials still say that their intelligence about Iraqi uranium purchases was supported by a second, independent source.
Just something to think about.
Rove's his planner. He makes it all work.
A little birdie told me to buy low and sell high. I'm not getting involved any deeper than that. My life is already in danger from what I just told you.
While I don't doubt the dems are dispicable enough to do this, I don't think they could pull off such a sophisticated ploy.
Rove laughed at the media? When? I'd loved to have seen that.
Personally, I think Rove is playing a grand game of rope-a-dope with the media. The longer and louder they (Dems&Media) scream, the greater will be their destruction when Bush does nothing about Rove and he stays right where he is. Rove and Bush are demonstrating the weakness of the DemMedia complex and their support will only weaken further as a result.
Really? Would you believe it if I told you they were sophisticated enough to pull off having majority rule in the house when they are the minority?
Dandy rant, PD. Lots of food for thought and -- contrary to the carpers -- nearly all of it was well-spelled.
I believe not. Some states have laws that if Roe/Doe is overturned abortion would not be legal California passed a law that abortion would be legal if it is overturned. It also depends on what the courts actually rule in overturning it.
Bush could just can Rove and get on with business.
The a-rats still believe that perception is more important than reality. I believe in the Huxley saying, you can twist perception, reality won't budge.
Either way, staying or leaving, Rove couldn't escape a barrage from the Dem terrorists, so why quit?
As for the President, he's a loyal man and I believe he will stand behind his man.
In fact, I'm looking for startling revelations to come out after the grand jury hearing. I also anticipate Bombardier Bush and Bombardier Rove to let go with some megaton bombshells just when the enemy is thinking they are winning some big victory.
Leni
She was not covert.
They are trying to neutralize Bush's "star appeal"
Notice how they are wheeling out Bill Clinton as they say americans do not trust Bush.
It is going to be GWBush vs BillCliton in 2006.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.