Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A little birdie told me what the Rove thing is all about.

Posted on 07/14/2005 1:50:45 PM PDT by Pukin Dog

Don’t ask me, because you know I won’t tell you how I came across this information.

Here is the scoop.

This is all about the Supreme Court.

With the knowledge that Rove was Matthew Cooper’s background source regarding the Plame incident, no matter the fact that no laws were broken, the Democrats leaped upon the matter as a way for Democrats and the MSM to possibly prevent Bush from changing the makeup of the Supreme Court. Under normal circumstances, Democrats cannot stop Bush from reshaping the Supreme Court, and that has Democrats terrified. They cannot sustain a Filibuster without Frist invoking the Nuclear Option on them, so they only have one last option, which is now underway.

The Democrats must demonize Bush to the degree that they can then begin their long-awaited impeachment articles, with the MSM in tow. If Congress can introduce articles of impeachment against Bush, then the MSM will demand that Bush postpone any nominations to the Supreme Court until the matter is decided. It is the only hope they have left of preventing a Conservative Supreme Court from taking hold, and if they do not accomplish this, the flow of money into Democratic coffers will stop instantaneously.

Next week, you will begin to hear Democrats suggesting that if Bush does not fire Karl Rove, then he is guilty of “Obstruction of Justice” and “Lying to the American People” in order to protect a friend. The Media will play along dutifully, because it was there idea in the first place.

Forget about Judith Miller.

Because the Special Prosecutor has asked the White House not to discuss the matter, no one will be able to inform Miller or the NY Times on how Miller should lie to save herself. Without that knowledge, the Times will not let her testify at all. They are paying her to be silent, and it is they who are actually guilty of ‘Obstruction of Justice’ Miller knows who the leaker is, and you all know who I believe that person to be.

What you all are about to see, is the most coordinated, vicious attack ever in the history of Politics against this administration, because those involved have everything at stake. Without control of the Supreme Court, the Liberal agenda is dead for the next 30-40 years. All of their Environmental nonsense, Abortion, Private Property, Affirmative Action and Civil Rights issues go right down the tubes.

The Bush Administration is aware of what is to come, and might be able to prevent it with a little ‘inside baseball’ but the looniest on the left will attempt this no matter what the outcome.

Expect editorials next week, arguing whether or not it is fair for a president who “stole the first election” and won the second election by the “smallest margin of any incumbent President” who is “embroiled in a National Security Scandal” to be deciding on the makeup of the Supreme Court. At the same time, Liberal Senators will begin to suggest that Conformation hearings on anyone Bush selects should be postponed until the investigations are over. Unfortunately for our side, they have an alley in one Arlen Specter. They will be leaning heavily on him to go along with delayed hearings. Specter is already angry with Bush over the Stem-cell research issue.

Will it work? No. Why? Because Bush understands the law, and also understands (with Rove’s help) that no matter how loud and long the Democrats scream, they and the MSM really cant do anything about the Supreme Court, but can effect public opinion. Bush, by telling Republicans to shut up about his choice, has set precedent for when he tells (by his Supreme Court selections) the Democrats the same thing. If he ignores both sides, he can just choose who he wants, and that is exactly what he will do.

So get ready for an ugly, ugly Summer and Fall. Don’t expect to hear much from Bush on Rove, or the Courts after he makes his selections. Republicans in Congress will also be silent (except Specter and Hagel) and will not risk their own re-elections and legacies to side with Democrats this time round.

So there it is, take it or leave it. I wont answer any questions about how or where I got the information, so don’t ask me.

-PD


TOPICS: Front Page News; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: cialeak; josephwilson; judithmiller; karlrove; liars; liberals; losers; medialeakers; pukindogsdaman; valerieplame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 621-629 next last
To: All
For the last time:

I believe the leaker is: JUDITH MILLER

161 posted on 07/14/2005 2:38:00 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
The only way they can advance their agenda is through the courts. And they know it.

I don't dispute it. However, my sense is that the political energy of the DNC is primarily provided by three groups -- homosexuals, enviros, and pro-aborts. Unlike abortion, neither the homos nor the enviros really need the USSC to drive their agenda. Which leaves the pro-aborts to drive the "courts" train.

162 posted on 07/14/2005 2:38:00 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

The moonbats really believe Rove is "Bush's brain." Like some sci-fi movie, they think if they can disconnect Bush from his brain he will die. Or at least his Administration will collapse. They also hate Rove because he has been the conservative enforcer in this Administration. Because of him, they have not been able to mau-mau this President Bush the way they did his father into raising taxes and wimping out on Iraq and appointing liberals to the bench and signing liberal legislation.


163 posted on 07/14/2005 2:38:02 PM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (If the WMD intelligence was so bad, why does Valerie Plame still have a job?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

This may be the case. If Miller testifies before the Grand Jury, she has to answer every question about every conversation she had. And she has no idea what other witnesses have said. No fun in that.


164 posted on 07/14/2005 2:38:19 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Could the viciousness of the Dems finally kill any thought in Bush's head that he might throw them one compromised nomination?
165 posted on 07/14/2005 2:38:32 PM PDT by CaptainK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
you are correct, it was Miller

But who told Judith Miller? She doesn't have a clearance and shouldn't know who is covert CIA. I'm guessing it was either Plame or Wilson told her.
166 posted on 07/14/2005 2:38:53 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: narby

These masters of equivocation would hold President Bush to a general statement that they explain for us, while parsing the meaning of a two-letter word. It's obvious what they're up to, and it won't work.

(Paraphrasing) 'Lightning or lightning-bug: If you've ever been caught out in the open during a storm,
it makes a real difference if one or the other lands on your head.' Samuel Clemens


167 posted on 07/14/2005 2:38:57 PM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper
Nothing seems to be below their level of morality.

When I was in college, I used to play "Dungeons and Dragons," but we added features from other, competing games. In our games, the dems "alignment" would be considered "Amoral Evil." (I know, AD&D Rules would be "Lawful, Neutral, or Chaotic," but Amoral was brought in from the Arduin rules...)

Mark

168 posted on 07/14/2005 2:39:02 PM PDT by MarkL (It was a shocking cock-up. The mice were furious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

But who told Miller?


169 posted on 07/14/2005 2:39:44 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Hillary Clinton can never be President. It is just an impossibility.
170 posted on 07/14/2005 2:39:48 PM PDT by jveritas (The left cannot win a national election ever again and never will the Buchananites and 3rd parties)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
"They might think that this is their last best chance to save American Socialism, but they will invite a backlash that registers a 9.9 on the Wellstonian Funeral scale if they try it."

LOL! You are sure right! I can hardly wait.

171 posted on 07/14/2005 2:40:08 PM PDT by redhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Rove laughed at them, that was really difficult for the MSM this morning.

Anyway, Bush won't fire Rove, and this is not helping the Democrats.

They are just FALLING APART.

Its fun to watch people like Lawrence O'Donnell just go ballistic.

172 posted on 07/14/2005 2:40:29 PM PDT by agincourt1415 (4 More Years of NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK
Bush never reacts to what the Democrats do. It infuriates them. They know he could not care less what Democrats do, because they are not running the show.
173 posted on 07/14/2005 2:40:44 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Pukin Dog:

Yes, you really do need to watch the spelling. Your ideas are rich enough to be read and considered carefully but the spelling errors really detract from your credibility.

And I will second the motion that (despite your notice to the contrary) you provide some hint re: your source. If you don't then we will all simply believe that we are reading your opinion, which in fact I find quite interesting. The possibility that you are right about the grand Dem plan is pretty high. What I don't understand is why you don't provide enough of a hint vis a vis your source to give us some idea that we are actually getting a peek under the Dem tent. Until you do that I'm going to file your stuff in the OPINION box.

But it is pretty interesting opinion.

174 posted on 07/14/2005 2:40:48 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Democrats are DESPERATE to DELAY until after the 2006 election.

You mean the Donkeys want to delay it until we get 60 Senators in 2006. Works for me.

175 posted on 07/14/2005 2:41:42 PM PDT by jveritas (The left cannot win a national election ever again and never will the Buchananites and 3rd parties)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
My guess is Wilson himself.
176 posted on 07/14/2005 2:42:05 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: cuteconservativechick
If Roe is overturned, the abortion industry will not exist

Not true. It will become a state issue, however, and in most states will probably be limited in various ways. It will probably never be totally illegal in any state.

In places like CA and NY, the abortion industry will do as well as it ever did.

177 posted on 07/14/2005 2:42:14 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: cuteconservativechick
If Roe is overturned, the abortion industry will not exist.

Actually Roe does NOT make abortion legal. It rules that states can NOT make abortion illegal, as a "Constitutional Right."

Even if Roe Vs Wade were overturned, abortion on demand will still be legal in all 50 states, as each legislature or the voters will have to make a decision. And you can bet that it will stay legal in the blue states.

Mark

178 posted on 07/14/2005 2:42:31 PM PDT by MarkL (It was a shocking cock-up. The mice were furious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
But who told Miller?

Miller had to have been told directly by Plame or by Wilson. Plame was likely a confidential CIA source for other WMD articles she wrote. Wilson might have told her to bolster his credibility when doing his op-ed piece.

179 posted on 07/14/2005 2:42:37 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Oh, yeah that's my guess too. I was hoping you had a source on that.


180 posted on 07/14/2005 2:43:00 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 621-629 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson