You silly goose. Wade was looking for yellow cake, because that's what Cheney said: "Let them eat cake."
Posted on 07/14/2005 1:50:45 PM PDT by Pukin Dog
Don’t ask me, because you know I won’t tell you how I came across this information.
Here is the scoop.
This is all about the Supreme Court.
With the knowledge that Rove was Matthew Cooper’s background source regarding the Plame incident, no matter the fact that no laws were broken, the Democrats leaped upon the matter as a way for Democrats and the MSM to possibly prevent Bush from changing the makeup of the Supreme Court. Under normal circumstances, Democrats cannot stop Bush from reshaping the Supreme Court, and that has Democrats terrified. They cannot sustain a Filibuster without Frist invoking the Nuclear Option on them, so they only have one last option, which is now underway.
The Democrats must demonize Bush to the degree that they can then begin their long-awaited impeachment articles, with the MSM in tow. If Congress can introduce articles of impeachment against Bush, then the MSM will demand that Bush postpone any nominations to the Supreme Court until the matter is decided. It is the only hope they have left of preventing a Conservative Supreme Court from taking hold, and if they do not accomplish this, the flow of money into Democratic coffers will stop instantaneously.
Next week, you will begin to hear Democrats suggesting that if Bush does not fire Karl Rove, then he is guilty of “Obstruction of Justice” and “Lying to the American People” in order to protect a friend. The Media will play along dutifully, because it was there idea in the first place.
Forget about Judith Miller.
Because the Special Prosecutor has asked the White House not to discuss the matter, no one will be able to inform Miller or the NY Times on how Miller should lie to save herself. Without that knowledge, the Times will not let her testify at all. They are paying her to be silent, and it is they who are actually guilty of ‘Obstruction of Justice’ Miller knows who the leaker is, and you all know who I believe that person to be.
What you all are about to see, is the most coordinated, vicious attack ever in the history of Politics against this administration, because those involved have everything at stake. Without control of the Supreme Court, the Liberal agenda is dead for the next 30-40 years. All of their Environmental nonsense, Abortion, Private Property, Affirmative Action and Civil Rights issues go right down the tubes.
The Bush Administration is aware of what is to come, and might be able to prevent it with a little ‘inside baseball’ but the looniest on the left will attempt this no matter what the outcome.
Expect editorials next week, arguing whether or not it is fair for a president who “stole the first election” and won the second election by the “smallest margin of any incumbent President” who is “embroiled in a National Security Scandal” to be deciding on the makeup of the Supreme Court. At the same time, Liberal Senators will begin to suggest that Conformation hearings on anyone Bush selects should be postponed until the investigations are over. Unfortunately for our side, they have an alley in one Arlen Specter. They will be leaning heavily on him to go along with delayed hearings. Specter is already angry with Bush over the Stem-cell research issue.
Will it work? No. Why? Because Bush understands the law, and also understands (with Rove’s help) that no matter how loud and long the Democrats scream, they and the MSM really cant do anything about the Supreme Court, but can effect public opinion. Bush, by telling Republicans to shut up about his choice, has set precedent for when he tells (by his Supreme Court selections) the Democrats the same thing. If he ignores both sides, he can just choose who he wants, and that is exactly what he will do.
So get ready for an ugly, ugly Summer and Fall. Don’t expect to hear much from Bush on Rove, or the Courts after he makes his selections. Republicans in Congress will also be silent (except Specter and Hagel) and will not risk their own re-elections and legacies to side with Democrats this time round.
So there it is, take it or leave it. I wont answer any questions about how or where I got the information, so don’t ask me.
-PD
Hmm...isn't the leaker...JOE WILSON himself???...:)
And the truly sad thing is how often they are successful in their little charades.
Just because the Dems have hatched a plan doesn't mean it is going to work. They think they have something now that will stick to the President. They have been wrong before with everything else they have tried, and I think they will be wrong again. This will never reach the level of impeachment, but I certainly would not put it past the Dems to start crying that "there are too many questions about the President's credibility" for him to nominate any justices right now.
Judith Miller? So you believe it was she who revealed Plame's name to..who? Cooper? I'm not being deliberately dense here, but I am a bit confused?
What about Novak saying he got it from 2 Admin sources?
Intersting, I was at a bank today and they had CNN on a TV. There is a CNN segment which covers the "Blogsphere"
The reported on everyone BUT FR.
No, they want it shut down. The WA Post, the NYT and another paper have all filed briefs with the court to request that the investigation be shut down. When that request was refused is when they issued the fatwah against Karl Rove that was reported on Drudge.
But who leaked it to Miller?
So you believe anyone who can spell? LOL
The issue behind the issue. I agree completely. When the dems say "extremist" in relation to a possible Bush pick that's exactly what they are talking about.
Wow. PD, thanks for the post. Will watch with interest.
No, they want it shut down. The WA Post, the NYT and another paper have all filed briefs with the court to request that the investigation be shut down. When that request was refused is when they issued the fatwah against Karl Rove that was reported on Drudge.
---
Interesting and accurate word choices.
Rush played Bush's quote on the subject and it read something along the lines of "if someone in his administration "broke the law" they would be dealt with. No evidence Rove has broken any law.
It was a joke.
I've seen that once or twice and was shocked! shocked! to find they only covered liberal, anti-war sites.
Aren't they already? The MSM is losing viewers and listeners faster than you can say Pukin. At last check, we had control of both houses of Congress and most Governorships, with margins expected to grow in 06. Dan Rather had to leave in disgrace, and we are in a position to change the courts for the next 40 years.
Given that, I think the public is doing okay understanding how the MSM and Democrats are trying to destroy the country.
You silly goose. Wade was looking for yellow cake, because that's what Cheney said: "Let them eat cake."
They are paying her to be silent......
If she draws wages while in jail, is she not benefiting from the crime and are the wages illegal? Cans he be paid to commit a crime and the payor not be guilty of obstruction?
I doubt the impeachment part because I don't see hoe they could ever get the house committee to consider such an action, much less carry it out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.