Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems Want Law Forcing Rove Firing
Fox News ^ | July 14, 2005 | Fox News

Posted on 07/14/2005 11:55:22 AM PDT by CarlEOlsoniii

WASHINGTON — Senate Democrats on Thursday pushed for legislation to deny security clearances to officials who disclose the identify of an undercover agent, an action that clearly responds to the controversy surrounding top White House aide Karl Rove (search).

Sens. Harry Reid or Nevada, Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, Joe Biden of Delaware and Dick Durbin of Illinois were offering the amendment as an add-on to the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill now being debated in the Senate.

"No federal employee who discloses, or has disclosed, classified information, including the identity of a covert agent of the Central Intelligence Agency, to a person not authorized to receive such information shall be permitted to hold a security clearance for access to such information," the amendment language reads.

The effort is one of many taken by Democrats in light of confirmation that White House Deputy Chief of Staff Rove discussed the identity of Valerie Plame (search) with a reporter for Time magazine in July 2003.

Despite the brouhaha, Bush gave his deputy chief of staff a visual show of support Thursday morning when the two departed the White House for Indiana. The president emerged from the Oval Office side by side with Rove, whereas Rove usually shuffles behind him. The two chatted as they walked towards Marine One together and both appeared very jovial.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
To: CarlEOlsoniii

Hmmmmmmm....I wonder if they are going to insist on a law that a young crazed intern stalker busy giving BJs in the Oval Office is not allowed to have TOP SECRET CLEARANCE at the Pentagon. That seems like a good law.


21 posted on 07/14/2005 12:03:02 PM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

why don't they ask for the expedited sentencing and removal of Sandy Burglars clearance?


22 posted on 07/14/2005 12:03:09 PM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Mo1; Miss Marple; Southack
"No federal employee who discloses, or has disclosed, classified information, including the identity of a covert agent of the Central Intelligence Agency, to a person not authorized to receive such information shall be permitted to hold a security clearance for access to such information," the amendment language reads.

They better be careful playing with that live wire....or they'll get zapped.

23 posted on 07/14/2005 12:04:02 PM PDT by Dog ( Is Joe Wilson is just a character Rove created?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bitt; johnny7; TomGuy; maryz; Lonesome in Massachussets; JLO; gidget7; nopardons; Kenny Bunk; ...

Not only did JF'n 'out' someone just recently, but he also 'outed' the entire American government in 1970, in his illegal talks with the North Vietnamese government, his encouragement of the protests at home that prolonged the war, (probably leading to additional thousands of deaths of US servicemen,) and eventually led to the US pulling out .


LTPing - think Kerry should lose his security clearance?


24 posted on 07/14/2005 12:04:12 PM PDT by bitt ('We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.' Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CarlEOlsoniii
Make sure the law forces everyone out of office!!

Committee Chairman Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., both mentioned a name, Fulton Armstrong, that had not previously come up in public accounts of the intelligence flap. It is not clear whether Armstrong is the undercover officer, but an exchange between Kerry and Bolton suggests that he may be.

Pray for W and Our Troops

25 posted on 07/14/2005 12:04:19 PM PDT by bray (Pray for the Freedom of the Iraqis from Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Nope, they have found that laws are only a problem for those who obey laws.

Remember Lautenberg and the violation of New Jersey election laws. Blown off completely and got away with it.
26 posted on 07/14/2005 12:04:24 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Good one!


27 posted on 07/14/2005 12:04:35 PM PDT by Dog ( Is Joe Wilson is just a character Rove created?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CarlEOlsoniii
of course, since she WASN'T an undercover agent, not even an ex post facto law like this one would apply...
28 posted on 07/14/2005 12:04:41 PM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
Plame was no longer a covert operative in 2003 when Rove spoke with the reporter. She'd been benched after the Ames mess, in '97 iirc, and her non-disclosure status would have expired in 2002.

If this is true, then it's obvious that nobody broke the current law either. So why has the prosecutor taken 2 years? Partisan witch hunt?

Also, the Dems and the media continually repeat the "Bush promised to fire the leaker" line, but I can't find anywhere where he said that. The only quote I've seen from Bush was: "If anybody broke the law, they will be dealt with". To me, that doesn't mean he would fire them or that he would even be the one dealing with them.

Does anybody know of a more specific quote where Bush promised to fire the leaker?

29 posted on 07/14/2005 12:05:20 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nina0113

No to mention, Rove did NOTHING WRONG!!!


30 posted on 07/14/2005 12:05:36 PM PDT by CarlEOlsoniii (Do Unto Osama as Osama has done unto us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dog
They better be careful playing with that live wire....or they'll get zapped.

I'm thinking a number of Senators would be thown off Committees too

31 posted on 07/14/2005 12:05:59 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CarlEOlsoniii

The Republicans should support this and then deny Leaky Leahy access to classified information. Kerry was well, given that he told about his classified trip into Cambodia, even though we all know it never happened.


32 posted on 07/14/2005 12:06:09 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
The Dems long for the Watergate days and are trying desperately to repeat their glory days of getting Nixon.
33 posted on 07/14/2005 12:06:23 PM PDT by joonbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cinives

That is the current law!! It becomes deactivated.

Unless Joe's holding company had contracts with the Government involving classified work he probably didn't hold a clearance.


34 posted on 07/14/2005 12:06:26 PM PDT by Wristpin ( Varitek says to A-Rod: "We don't throw at .260 hitters.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CarlEOlsoniii
Just make the following changes and the 'Rats will drop this idea like a hot potatoe:
"No federal employee or elected official who discloses, or has disclosed, or who's staff discloses classified information, including the identity of a covert agent of the Central Intelligence Agency, to a person not authorized to receive such information shall be permitted to hold a security clearance for access to such information,"

35 posted on 07/14/2005 12:07:35 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarlEOlsoniii
What silliness. This is such a stupid ploy on its face:


36 posted on 07/14/2005 12:07:41 PM PDT by kevkrom (WARNING: If you're not sure whether or not it's sarcasm, it probably is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

I thought that earlier...glad you posted it.


37 posted on 07/14/2005 12:07:47 PM PDT by queenkathy ("Eat a live toad first thing in the morning. Nothing worse can happen to you for the rest of the day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CarlEOlsoniii

People in Hell want ice water.


38 posted on 07/14/2005 12:08:04 PM PDT by Salamander (We're pain, we're steel, a plot of knives. We're Transmaniacon MC!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

again... is anyone getting just kinda pissed at this whole thing. I cant even turn the TV on I can only believe that people think that Dems are crazy and excessive. They have asked to fire Rumsfeld, Rice, Rove (a couple of times), Cheney, Delay, Lott.... Wonder what they would do if something really happened. hmmm. Like a terror attack let me guess FIRE BUSH. Anyway ranting. But Im becoming more and more pissed this is not funny anymore!!! Am I by myself


39 posted on 07/14/2005 12:08:17 PM PDT by newconhere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: newconhere

You are not alone.


40 posted on 07/14/2005 12:08:54 PM PDT by queenkathy ("Eat a live toad first thing in the morning. Nothing worse can happen to you for the rest of the day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson