Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems Want Law Forcing Rove Firing
Fox News ^ | July 14, 2005 | Fox News

Posted on 07/14/2005 11:55:22 AM PDT by CarlEOlsoniii

WASHINGTON — Senate Democrats on Thursday pushed for legislation to deny security clearances to officials who disclose the identify of an undercover agent, an action that clearly responds to the controversy surrounding top White House aide Karl Rove (search).

Sens. Harry Reid or Nevada, Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, Joe Biden of Delaware and Dick Durbin of Illinois were offering the amendment as an add-on to the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill now being debated in the Senate.

"No federal employee who discloses, or has disclosed, classified information, including the identity of a covert agent of the Central Intelligence Agency, to a person not authorized to receive such information shall be permitted to hold a security clearance for access to such information," the amendment language reads.

The effort is one of many taken by Democrats in light of confirmation that White House Deputy Chief of Staff Rove discussed the identity of Valerie Plame (search) with a reporter for Time magazine in July 2003.

Despite the brouhaha, Bush gave his deputy chief of staff a visual show of support Thursday morning when the two departed the White House for Indiana. The president emerged from the Oval Office side by side with Rove, whereas Rove usually shuffles behind him. The two chatted as they walked towards Marine One together and both appeared very jovial.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last
To: kaktuskid; MeekOneGOP; potlatch; Happy2BMe; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; Smartass; B4Ranch; ...


John "Nuisance" Kerry?



121 posted on 07/14/2005 2:40:21 PM PDT by devolve (-------------------------------------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub


John "Nuisance" Kerry?



122 posted on 07/14/2005 3:02:31 PM PDT by devolve (-------------------------------------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: bitt
The DemOdogs know they lost this one, that's why all the barking. Based on what is now known, don't be shocked if Joe Wilson and his James Bond wife get indicted.

However, we have to wait until Fitzgerald and the grand jury is finished before any real info is divulged to reach an opinion.
123 posted on 07/14/2005 3:06:37 PM PDT by Smartass (Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Smartass

Hope you don't mind if I post that list of 10 over on my blog.


124 posted on 07/14/2005 4:56:04 PM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: CarlEOlsoniii
US CONSTITUTION.

ARTICLE I. SEC 9.

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

Hello?

125 posted on 07/14/2005 5:12:47 PM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
By all means. Help yourself to anything I post...

:o)
126 posted on 07/14/2005 5:27:22 PM PDT by Smartass (Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA; MeekOneGOP; potlatch; ntnychik; devolve; Happy2BMe; Boazo; Grampa Dave; Lady Jag; ...
TITLE 50 > CHAPTER 15 > SUBCHAPTER IV > § 421 Prev | Next

§ 421. Protection of identities of certain United States undercover intelligence officers, agents, informants, and sources

Release date: 2005-03-17

(a) Disclosure of information by persons having or having had access to classified information that identifies covert agent Whoever, having or having had authorized access to classified information that identifies a covert agent, intentionally discloses any information identifying such covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such covert agent and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent’s intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(b) Disclosure of information by persons who learn identity of covert agents as result of having access to classified information Whoever, as a result of having authorized access to classified information, learns the identify of a covert agent and intentionally discloses any information identifying such covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such covert agent and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent’s intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(c) Disclosure of information by persons in course of pattern of activities intended to identify and expose covert agents Whoever, in the course of a pattern of activities intended to identify and expose covert agents and with reason to believe that such activities would impair or impede the foreign intelligence activities of the United States, discloses any information that identifies an individual as a covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such individual and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such individual’s classified intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(d) Imposition of consecutive sentences A term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be consecutive to any other sentence of imprisonment.


127 posted on 07/14/2005 7:52:33 PM PDT by Smartass (Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: CarlEOlsoniii

Does this law say it's okay to stuff your socks and shorts with secret info?


128 posted on 07/14/2005 8:03:13 PM PDT by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newconhere

David Gregory was subdued tonight as he sat in for Matthews. Looked like he had an ice water enema. Very subdued. I wonder if the bulb is starting to slowly luminesce or he was told to hold it down.


129 posted on 07/14/2005 8:18:06 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jackson57
WHAT WAS THE LEAK THAT INSENSED WILSON SO MUCH? Does it piss him off that someone mentioned his wife. Someone...anyone can mention anyones name. The Espionage Act of 1982 does not preclude the mention of Plame...she was not covered by the requirements in the act. So what is the leak that everyone is speaking of?

Do the dems simply say so and it makes it so? All of this is a hoax being perpetrated at the taxpayers expense in an attempt to weaken the President.

130 posted on 07/14/2005 8:24:45 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Hattie; MeekOneGOP; PhilDragoo; Happy2BMe; potlatch; ntnychik; Smartass; DoughtyOne; bitt; Boazo; ..


Is that a subliminal reference to Al Gore's Photoshopped magazine cover?


131 posted on 07/14/2005 8:32:29 PM PDT by devolve (-------------------------------------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Thanks for the ping!


132 posted on 07/14/2005 8:42:41 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Smartass

...BUMP!


133 posted on 07/14/2005 9:16:56 PM PDT by Seadog Bytes (“The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.”—Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: jw777

Thank you!   ...but I just can't BELIEVE this guy is gonna get off with just a slap on the wrist...while the knotheads want to go on, and ON, about the Rove thing.   SHEESH!!!


134 posted on 07/14/2005 9:30:52 PM PDT by Seadog Bytes (“The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.”—Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Smartass

Nailed him! Good JOB!!!


135 posted on 07/14/2005 9:55:17 PM PDT by Seadog Bytes (“The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.”—Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Moral Hazard

I thought the idea of having a security clearance was to give the person a sort of "bond." The person with a SECRET Clearance was known to be WORTHY of keeping the information SECURE. TRUSTWORTHY. Lose your WORTHyness: Lose the clearance.

?


136 posted on 07/14/2005 9:58:24 PM PDT by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Smartass; devolve; Seadog Bytes

137 posted on 07/15/2005 12:27:03 AM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Smartass

bttt


138 posted on 07/15/2005 12:32:56 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

...BUMP!


139 posted on 07/15/2005 10:35:41 AM PDT by Seadog Bytes (“The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.”—Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; PhilDragoo; Ragtime Cowgirl; Cindy; SusanTK; AdmSmith; Valin; ALOHA RONNIE; ...



140 posted on 07/15/2005 11:20:13 AM PDT by Smartass (Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson