Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anger At Government Grows In Bombings' Wake
Transterrestrial Musings Weblog ^ | July 14th, 2005 | Rand Simberg

Posted on 07/14/2005 8:31:29 AM PDT by NonZeroSum

September 8, 1940

LONDON (Routers) The new government of Winston Churchill, in office for a few scant months, came under fire today, after the seemingly senseless destruction of property and lives in the city by German bombers yesterday. Many are blaming the new Prime Minister for the bombings, which they view as a result of his stubborn support of an illegal war against Vichy France, and inappropriately aggressive policies against the misunderstood Germans.

"Under Chamberlain," said one Labour backbencher, "we had peace for our time."

"Now," he went on, "under this new brutal and dictatorial Tory rule, Churchill, along with his poodle Franklin Delanodamngood Roosevelt, has brought this wretched war home to Whitehall itself, and ordinary Londoners."

The bombing began around four o'clock yesterday afternoon, with squadrons of German bombers blackening the skies over London, dropping many thousands of pounds of bombs on the city for two hours. A couple hours later, a second wave of bombings commenced, with the bombers' navigators guided by the fires from the first attack, with no cessation until early this morning. The fires still burn, and the total casualties have yet to be properly assessed.

It is widely believed that the lamentable attacks have their root cause in the government's unwillingness to recognize the new Pétain government in Paris, established over two months ago, following the liberation of France by German troops in late June, or to negotiate respectfully with the German government. Instead, it has been undermining it, and its German ally, with supplies and moral support for its enemies, despite the "withdrawal" of British forces at Dunkirk three months ago. Churchill has in fact defiantly supported the illegitimate "Free" French government established by "General" Charles de Gaulle, while making blustery and bellicose speeches, filled with obvious disdain and hatred for the Germans and their elected leader and head of the Nazi Party, Adolf Hitler.

The German's understandable sense of beleaguerment is further fed by the British alliance with Roosevelt's America, via the Lend-Lease program among other things, creating a spectre of an Anglo-American conspiracy against them. The aggressive actions of the US warship "Greer" three days ago, in which its sailors lobbed depth charges at a German submarine (though fortunately with no casualties), has only fed such concerns.

A former ambassador to Germany, off the record, pointed out that, after all, it is Britain and the former Third French Republic who are the aggressors, having declared war on Germany last September.

Some scholars in Northern European studies think that in fact, ultimately, these acts of violence have a deeper cause--the years of poverty brought on by imperialistic policies against Germany. The tragic Treaty of Versailles after the Great War kept Germany on its economic back for years, and the resulting deprivation has fueled the anger of young bomber crews brought up in the depths of the long depression.

Under these circumstances, most think it little wonder that the Germans have been driven to such desperate measures as bombing innocents, in the wake of such unremitting animosity and economic scarcity. It no doubt adds to their fury that many of their bombers were shot down in the raid by British anti-aircraft fire and RAF aircraft (weapons that many think should be outlawed, or at least renounced, in the interest of international stability), at the cost of hundreds of brave German lives.

More shockingly, many even believe, with some justification, that the German bombers were deliberately targeted, while the gunners attempted to miss British aircraft, a government policy that some properly view as a form of ethnic profiling.

Given such policies, they say, Britain should prepare for more such attacks in the future, until the government can understand why the Germans hate us, and act on that understanding with more rational and humane policies.

The government, of course, attempts to claim that this is nonsense.

"The Nazis have declared their intention and right to conquer and rule the world--it's right there in Hitler's own book, Mein Kampf," said one outraged assistant in the Defense ministry. "One doesn't have to indulge in sociological analyses to know why they bomb us--they do so because we are now the bulwark for the still-free world against Hitler's totalitarian ambitions. Why not simply take them at their word?"

"They've violated the Munich agreement, and the von Ribbentropp Pact is unlikely to hold up for long. They cannot be trusted or negotiated with. They've invaded our allies Poland, France, the Netherlands, Belgium and other places. The notion that, if we would simply listen to them and hear out their grievances and give them what they want, they'll leave us alone, is infantile."

Of course, it seems common sentiment now that, sadly, such simple-minded analyses are the problem, not the solution--that an entire people should not be judged by selected words from a single book. In the wake of such hopeless policies, and apparently blind and brutal government, the British people are seemingly settling in for a long, bloody and hopeless reign of carnage, that no one can win.

[Copyright 2005, by Rand Simberg]


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: churchill; nazis; roosevelt; satire; whytheyhateus; wwii
When will we ever learn that war is not the answer...?
1 posted on 07/14/2005 8:31:31 AM PDT by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum

Wow. That's a great find.


2 posted on 07/14/2005 8:34:44 AM PDT by grondram (The problem with the middle of the road is that you're passed on all sides and likely to be runover.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum

Thank goodness we had a Democrat as a President during WWII! At least we could always count on Republicans to support the country in a time of war, even when they are the opposition party...


3 posted on 07/14/2005 8:39:53 AM PDT by winner3000 (part)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grondram

I guess I have to put SATIRE in big, blinking red letters on things like this.


4 posted on 07/14/2005 8:40:04 AM PDT by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum

And I should have put a smiley in my reply. :)


5 posted on 07/14/2005 8:41:49 AM PDT by grondram (The problem with the middle of the road is that you're passed on all sides and likely to be runover.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
I have said before that even if we were in a war with a reanimated Third Reich the 4th estate would maintain 'critical distance' and be be 'nuanced' in its reporting. Herr Goebbels died to soon just think what he could mange with the current set of presstitutes.
For that matter imagine what the pressies would do with such an event as the Royal Navy's attack on the French fleet at Oran on 3 July 1940:

The Destruction of the French Fleet at Mers-el-Kebir, French North Africa (now Algeria), by the British Royal Navy took place on July 3, 1940.

In 1940, during World War II, following the surrender of France to the advancing forces of Nazi Germany, the British were unable to discover whether the terms of the surrender would allow the French fleet to be used against Britain. Such a shift in the balance of power at sea would have seriously threatened Britain's ability to keep her supply lines open, and jeopardised her survival. Winston Churchill therefore personally ordered that the French navy should either fight alongside the Royal Navy or be neutralised in some way, preventing it from falling into German hands. To prevent this, they launched Operation Catapult.

The French fleet was widely dispersed at this time. Some were in port in France; others had escaped from France to British controlled ports, mainly in Britain itself or Alexandria in Egypt. At the first stage of Operation Catapult, the ships in British ports Plymouth and Portsmouth were simply boarded on July 3, 1940 at night, with few casualties on both sides (on the world's biggest submarine, Surcouf). Other ships were the two obsolete battleships Paris and Courbet and some destroyers and submarines. Many went on to be used by the Free French forces, and some sailors joined the Free French. Other sailors were repatriated to France.

The most powerful concentration of French warships at the time was the flotilla located at the port of Mers-el-Kebir in French Algeria. This consisted of the old battleships Provence and Bretagne, the modern battleships Dunkerque and Strasbourg, the aviation transport Commandante Teste and 6 destroyers, all under the command of Admiral Marcel-Bruno Gensoul. The British Admiral James Somerville of Force H, based in Gibraltar, was ordered to deliver an ultimatum to the French, stating:

"It is impossible for us, your comrades up to now, to allow your fine ships to fall into the power of the German or Italian enemy. We are determined to fight on until the end, and if we win, as we think we shall, we shall never forget that France was our Ally, that our interests are the same as hers, and that our common enemy is Germany. Should we conquer we solemnly declare that we shall restore the greatness and territory of France. For this purpose we must make sure that the best ships of the French Navy are not used against us by the common foe. In these circumstances, His Majesty's Government have instructed me to demand that the French Fleet now at Mers el Kebir and Oran shall act in accordance with one of the following alternatives;
(a) sail with us and continue the fight until victory against the Germans and Italians.
(b) Sail with reduced crews under our control to a British port. The reduced crews would be repatriated at the earliest moment.
If either of these courses is adopted by you we will restore your ships to France at the conclusion of the war or pay full compensation if they are damaged meanwhile.
(c) Alternatively if you feel bound to stipulate that your ships should not be used against the Germans or Italians unless these break the Armistice, then sail them with us with reduced crews to some French port in the West Indies — Martinique for instance — where they can be demilitarised to our satisfaction, or perhaps be entrusted to the United States and remain safe until the end of the war, the crews being repatriated.
If you refuse these fair offers, I must with profound regret, require you to sink your ships within 6 hours.
Finally, failing the above, I have the orders from His Majesty's Government to use whatever force may be necessary to prevent your ships from falling into German or Italian hands."
Admiral Gensoul refused to accept any of these options, in accordance with orders from Admiral François Darlan, commander of the Vichy French Navy. He declared that neither the Germans nor the Italians would get his ships, and that force would be repelled with force. Both fleets prepared for battle. The British force consisted of 3 battleships: HMS Hood, HMS Valiant and HMS Resolution and an aircraft carrier HMS Ark Royal. The British had an advantage, since French ships were anchored in a narrow harbour. Dunkerque and Strasbourg could not use their main artillery, which was grouped on their bows. Moreover, despite their old age, the British battleships had heavier artillery than the French ones.

The British opened fire on July 3, 1940 at 16:56. The French answered with fire, but it was not effective. In the ensuing action Bretagne exploded and sank at 17:09, while Provence, Dunkerque and a destroyer Mogador were damaged and ran aground. Strasbourg meanwhile was able to escape with 4 destroyers and returned to the French port of Toulon on July 4. The British aircraft from HMS Ark Royal tried to pursue Strasbourg, but without effect.

In the following events, on July 4, the British submarine HMS Pandora sank the French aviso (gunboat) Rigault de Genouilly, sailing from Oran. On the night of July 4 the French bombers carried out a retaliatory raid over the British fleet in Gibraltar to no great effect. Since the British believed that damage to Dunkerque and Provence was not very serious, the British aircraft Fairey Swordfish from HMS Ark Royal commenced an air raid on Mers-el-Kebir the morning of July 5. One torpedo hit Dunkerque, causing serious damage. In the whole action against Mers-el-Kebir, 1297 French sailors were killed and about 350 were wounded. The action severely strained relations between Britain and France for some time, and gave the Germans a propaganda coup.

However, the action was very influential amongst the leadership of the United States, which was gradually preparing public opinion for escalating involvement in the war. Following the rapid success of the German military, there was considerable speculation that the United Kingdom would soon fall. There seemed to be a great risk that the Royal Navy would fall into German hands, including any material provided to the British by the USA. Martin Gilbert in his biography of Churchill wrote "Within a few days 'Oran' had become a symbol of British ruthlessness and determination".

Churchill noted to a colleague that the French at Oran finally fought "with all their vigour for the first time since the war broke out".

The French ships in Alexandria under command of Admiral Godfroy, including an old battleship Lorraine and four cruisers, were blocked by the British in a port on July 3, and given the same proposals as in Mers-el-Kebir. After negotiations, the French Admiral agreed on July 7 to disarm his fleet and stay in port until the end of the war. They stayed there until 1943, when they eventually joined the Free French.

The last phase of Operation Catapult was an attack on July 8 by aircraft from the carrier HMS Hermes against the modern French battleship Richelieu, staying in Dakar. One torpedo hit and damaged Richelieu.

On November 27, 1942 the Germans indeed attempted to capture the French fleet in Toulon base. This time, the French sank all their ships, including Dunkerque and Strasbourg.
6 posted on 07/14/2005 8:50:06 AM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
Very nice!

Tight satire
7 posted on 07/14/2005 9:06:33 AM PDT by StoneGiant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

Not always. Some Republicans, like Henry Ford and Charles Lindbergh, tended to be Nazi sympathizers (of course, so did some Dems, like Joe Kennedy). There was actually quite a bit of opposition to getting into the war, which is why we didn't get heavily involved (ignoring the Greer incident) until Pearl Harbor.


8 posted on 07/15/2005 6:27:53 AM PDT by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum

We were not officially at war until after Pearl Harbor. After that, even Lindburgh, an avowed peace activist, saw the wisdom to beat the Nazis. The nation was united during WWII.


9 posted on 07/15/2005 6:34:01 AM PDT by winner3000 (part)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

Well, many would say we aren't "officially" at war now, based on the fact that there's been no declaration of war, and that there's no particular country that we're formally at war with.


10 posted on 07/15/2005 6:41:22 AM PDT by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
I guess I have to put SATIRE in big, blinking red letters on things like this.


11 posted on 07/15/2005 6:45:11 AM PDT by 11th_VA (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

The was one Republican Congresswoman (Jeanette Rankin) from Montana who voted no to declaring war on Japan after Pearl Harbor. She apparently had done the same during World War 1


12 posted on 07/15/2005 6:46:50 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum

Great satire. The sad thing is, it's right on the money.


13 posted on 07/15/2005 7:18:51 AM PDT by Darnright ( Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson