Posted on 07/14/2005 7:17:03 AM PDT by KeyesPlease
Republicans yesterday called on Attorney General Peter Harvey to explain why his office distributed 93 percent of state homeland security equipment grant money to towns in Democratic legislative districts over the past three years.
Senate Minority Leader Leonard Lance (R-Hunterdon) said the attorney general must release the criteria used to award towns in Democratic-controlled districts $21.3 million while giving towns in Republican districts just $1.6 million.
"Mr. Harvey owes all of us an explanation," said Lance. "He needs to assure the people of New Jersey that everything is being done to protect them regardless of which party represents them in the Legislature."
Oops! someone noticed
95% to Democraps -vs- 5% to Republicans... has to be deliberate
HA! There goes the keyboard!
Very strange - Dr. Watson!
It's good to see the Democratic Party returning to its historic roots of bribes, graft, and corruption.
Oops! someone noticed ...
-----
And people have the audacity to ask, "WHAT IS WRONG WITH WASHINGTON"?? The problem is they are not doing their job and have not been for a long time -- they are more interested in getting re-elected than they are running the United States!!!!
No suprise here.
I would be interested in knowing how many of the cities that got homeland defense money are "sanctuary cities" for illegal immigrants.
I'd think that the answer is pretty obvious. I'll bet the Democrat areas are like Mos Eisley, "You'll never find a more wretched hive of scum and villany."
What is the percentage of population in the same areas? Do 95% of the people live in those democratic controlled districts?
I doubt it. The majority of funding probably goes to urban areas, as they are densely populated and thus are the most likely targets of terrorism. Voters in urban areas tend to lean Democrat. Hence, the discrepancy.
what State, please?
Peter Harvery should be jailed by the Fed immediately.
Because that is where the terrorists live?
The source seems to indicate that it's New Jersey.
Is there party patronage? Of course, but there's also the real world. Untill the actual funding figures are made known or printed, ther's not much to rant about.
NJ. It is listed in Topics.
I'd suppose I'd be for this if we could just put a wall around the RAT areas and turn them into prisons. It would be more efficient to cut out the middleman (cops and courts). Just kidding!
This article refers to the distribution of Homeland Security funds in the state of New Jersey. So we're talking about Trenton, not Washington.
"The majority of funding probably goes to urban areas, as they are densely populated and thus are the most likely targets of terrorism."
I see no fault in what you say. Some times folks seem to knee jerk without thinking. Me included.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.