Posted on 07/13/2005 8:20:41 AM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Islamic leaders and peace groups are criticizing the California National Guard for a flier posted in its headquarters suggesting the United States execute Islamic terrorists with bullets dipped in pig's blood to deny them entry to heaven.
The flier attributed the practice to World War I General John J. Pershing.
"Maybe it is time for this segment of history to repeat itself, maybe in Iraq?" the flier stated. It was posted outside a cubicle in the Guard's Civil Support Division.
A second flier showed the wings and tail of a bomber forming a peace sign with the slogan, "Peace the old fashioned way."
Also posted was a cartoon from a Web site showing a Red Crescent ambulance stuffed with weapons and a caricature that looks like the late-Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat unloading the weapons.
Guard spokesman Lt. Col. Doug Hart at first defended the postings to the San Jose Mercury News, which reported them Tuesday, but Hart later said they had been removed.
Peace activists spotted the fliers during a tour last week.
The tour came after peace groups and a state senator questioned whether a new Guard unit had been formed to spy on U.S. citizens and had monitored a Mother's Day anti-war rally. A federal investigation of the allegations is underway.
"It's troubling to see a governmental organization dedicated to the security of our country promoting culturally and religiously insensitive ideas," said William Youmans, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Santa Clara. "It's very possible to combat terrorism without offending the cultural values of a major world religion."
I did spend too much time in College, but it was spent studying Molecular Biology. My knowledge of history and religion is all self study.
I have killed in cold blood, and taken innocent life.
I do know about the teachings of the Koran, as well as the Bible; I read them both.
Why limit Christian theology to the New Testament? Jesus didn't. And the Bibles instructions for a city taken from the unbelievers is to kill all the male children, even down to the swaddling babe, and all the women who have known men. The women children were to be taken as slaves. Psalms says that blessed shall he be who taketh the baby of the Babylonians and dash their heads against a stone. If you don't understand this you have much to learn.
The "cultural values of a major world religion" IS the issue, Youmans. Fourteen centuries of history prove it.
If you have not read the Bible how can you claim to be a Christian? You think that the Bible is the unerring word of God, his message to you.....never read it, don't intend to.
"Worry not about the mote in your neighbors eye, but acknowledge the beam within your own."
Pig blood. Pig fat.
Whatever it takes!
Well congrats to you for turning your life around. Religion can be a very powerful force for good in the world.
And good for you for paying attention to the most important parts of the Bible for a Christian, the 4 Gospels. I think most Christians start out reading the Bible and never get through the Old Testament; that is why we have so many "eye for an eye" 'Christians' out there.
When will we learn? That's a good question.
Include bacon bits with your care packages. The troops know what to do with them.
Sounds to me like the reverse is true: Peace activists spying (and tattling) on the military. So much for freedom of speech, eh?
Bacon bits, bacon bits, bacon bits, bacon bits!
>Calif. Guard Targeted Over Pig-Blood Flier
AP via Yahoo ^ | July 13, 2005<
>SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Islamic leaders and peace groups are criticizing the California National Guard for a flier posted in its headquarters suggesting the United States execute Islamic terrorists with bullets dipped in pig's blood to deny them entry to heaven.<
So whats new? Groups such as those mentioned are constantly criticizing Americas Military, Americas Government, Americas Institutions, and the American People. Why do anything to avoid the criticism? Were going to get blasted anyway, no matter what we say or do, so why pay attention to anything the anti-American groups say.
A sidebar: Why is it that when Islamic lunatics, peace groups, and other anti-American Democrats, express their disapproval of what our side says or does, its called criticising, but when our side expresses disapproval of these groups, its called attacking?
Another thing: What is it with this description execute? All that was proposed was to dip bullets in pigs blood for use by our military in self-defense against attacks launched by rabid lunatics. The actual word used suggests our troops are committing murder on unarmed innocents lined up against a wall. Surely nothing more than an innocent error committed by a deeply anxious, sincerely concerned reporter merely trying to do his job. Right. The only problem with that theory is that this sort of ill-use goes on all the time.
>The flier attributed the practice to World War I General John J. Pershing.<
>"Maybe it is time for this segment of history to repeat itself, maybe in Iraq?" the flier stated. It was posted outside a cubicle in the Guard's Civil Support Division.<
A story thats been around for a century. The stuff of legend, it can be neither confirmed or disproved, but it bespeaks of an American spirit determined not to yield to the Islamic lunacy of a century ago. You think this war has been going on only since 11 September? Or even since 1993? Its been going on for fifteen hundred years.
>A second flier showed the wings and tail of a bomber forming a peace sign with the slogan, "Peace the old fashioned way."<
Peace through strength. Shades of Ronald Reagan! Whats wrong with that? Nothing, except those who side with the lunatics and against America, dont like it because it speaks a truth they cant deal with.
>Also posted was a cartoon from a Web site showing a Red Crescent ambulance stuffed with weapons and a caricature that looks like the late-Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat unloading the weapons.<
Oh, the horror of it all! The cartoon represents a truth widely reported about known incidents which have happened (with or without Arafat) countless times. Those Guardsmen have a lot of nerve going around posting the truth.
>Guard spokesman Lt. Col. Doug Hart at first defended the postings to the San Jose Mercury News, which reported them Tuesday, but Hart later said they had been removed.<
Defending the eminently defensible. Good for Lt. Col. Hart. Who ordered the posters removed (bet it wasnt Lt. Col. Hart)? Whomever it was, he should be reduced to his permanent rank and cashiered out of the service.
>Peace activists spotted the fliers during a tour last week.<
>The tour came after peace groups and a state senator questioned whether a new Guard unit had been formed to spy on U.S. citizens and had monitored a Mother's Day anti-war rally. A federal investigation of the allegations is underway.<
Anti-American groups ought to be monitored so they cant later lie about what they said or did at their protest rallies.
>It's troubling to see a governmental organization dedicated to the security of our country promoting culturally and religiously insensitive ideas," said William Youmans, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Santa Clara. "It's very possible to combat terrorism without offending the cultural values of a major world religion."<
Apparently, its not possible to insist that gratuitous allegations must have some fragment of factual support before they are dignified with an investigation. If thats the standard for investigations, then FReepers could bury every Congressional office and every Federal Department, commission, and Agency with thousands of allegations, all of which would bear up better under inspection than the lies of anti-American lunatics. But, of course, FReepers would be ignored (the attempt would be made to ignore us anyway).
Its just amazing how so many people nod their heads and raise their voices in smug approval of outright lies, but howl in outrage when the truth is spoken. They may protest culturally and religiously insensitive ideas, but they dont seem to be able to do it without offending the cultural values of an entire world civilization.
What a peaceful(NOT) religion (NOT!!!).
""It's troubling to see a governmental organization dedicated to the security of our country promoting culturally and religiously insensitive ideas," said William Youmans, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations..."
Whaaaaaa, I'm so sorry you were offended. NOT!!!
USMC:
When in doubt, empty the magazine!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.