Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CFR's Plan to Integrate US, Canada, Mexico (Americans Being Betrayed)
Eagle Forum ^ | July 13, 2005 | Phylls Schlafly

Posted on 07/13/2005 5:03:35 AM PDT by Lindykim

CFR's Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada by Phyllis Schlafly, July 13, 2005

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has just let the cat out of the bag about what's really behind our trade agreements and security partnerships with the other North American countries. A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

"Community" means integrating the United States with the corruption, socialism, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada. "Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada. "Community" is sometimes called "space" but the CFR goal is clear: "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely." The CFR's "integrated" strategy calls for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people."

The CFR document lays "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." The "common security perimeter" will require us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations" with Mexico and Canada, "harmonize entry screening," and "fully share data about the exit and entry of foreign nationals."

This CFR document, called "Building a North American Community," asserts that George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details. It was at this same meeting, grandly called the North American summit, that President Bush pinned the epithet "vigilantes" on the volunteers guarding our border in Arizona.

A follow-up meeting was held in Ottawa on June 27, where the U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, told a news conference that "we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders." The White House issued a statement that the Ottawa report "represents an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership."

The CFR document calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages.

Just to make sure that bringing cheap labor from Mexico is an essential part of the plan, the CFR document calls for "a seamless North American market" and for "the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico."

The document's frequent references to "security" are just a cover for the real objectives. The document's "security cooperation" includes the registration of ballistics and explosives, while Canada specifically refused to cooperate with our Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).

To no one's surprise, the CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico.

The experience of the European Union and the World Trade Organization makes it clear that a common market requires a court system, so the CFR document calls for "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution." Get ready for decisions from non-American judges who make up their rules ad hoc and probably hate the United States anyway.

The CFR document calls for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR document calls for adopting a "tested once" principle for pharmaceuticals, by which a product tested in Mexico will automatically be considered to have met U.S. standards.

The CFR document demands that we implement "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico." That's code language for putting illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, which is bound to bankrupt the system.

Here's another handout included in the plan. U.S. taxpayers are supposed to create a major fund to finance 60,000 Mexican students to study in U.S. colleges.

To ensure that the U.S. government carries out this plan so that it is "achievable" within five years, the CFR calls for supervision by a North American Advisory Council of "eminent persons from outside government . . . along the lines of the Bilderberg" conferences.

The best known Americans who participated in the CFR Task Force that wrote this document are former Massachusetts Governor William Weld and Bill Clinton's immigration chief Doris Meissner. Another participant, American University Professor Robert Pastor, presented the CFR plan at a friendly hearing of Senator Richard Lugar's Foreign Relations Committee on June 9.

Ask your Senators and Representatives which side they are on: the CFR's integrated North American Community or U.S. sovereignty guarded by our own borders.

Eagle Forum • PO Box 618 • Alton, IL 62002 • phone: 618-462-5415 • fax: 618-462-8909 • eagle@eagleforum.org Read this article online: http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: cfr; communismwins; crimeagainstamerica; enemywithin; lossofcountry; openborder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last
To: Final Authority

They appear to have their own set of trolls and shills to blow a smoke screen across their activities.

Since when does this forum call Schlafly a tinfoilnutter?


41 posted on 07/13/2005 7:07:11 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Just remember that there are spooks all over this board who's job it is to discredit legitimate discussion in order to sow discord, doubt, and cause division over subjects which easily unify even those with differing political inclinations.


42 posted on 07/13/2005 7:08:24 AM PDT by blabs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

laughs, yeah.

but a lotta people on this forum drink this kook aid.


43 posted on 07/13/2005 7:11:01 AM PDT by ken21 (it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim; Paul Ross; GOP_1900AD; hedgetrimmer; indthkr
People can laugh all they want at the 'tin foil' Birch crowd ...but the fact remains that the concept of global, open borders (i.e..the so called 'borderless society') has been out there and discussed by some of the economic and cultural elites for some time.

The late Robert Bartley of the WSJ was an early proponent of the borderless society concept. The WSJ remains one of the most outspoken proponents of liberalized immigration, amnesty, and guest worker bills.

These concepts are sometimes advocated from an economic perspective...sometimes from a 'compassionate' perspective...but the fact remains that there is an underlying agenda. I have a vague theory as to why some people might favor this type of system over our traditional capitalistic / constitutional system (from an economic perspective)...but I don't want to get into that here.

I think that what we are seeing is a 'coming out party' of this crowd...who have been a relatively silent but active player in both the democrat and the republican party hierarchies.

IMHO, this 'coming out' is going to result in lots of friction...and fracturing of traditional political alliances. No longer will the simple terms Democrat, Republican, Liberal, Conservative be appropriate..its going to be more along the lines of 'traditionalists' vs 'modernist'.

It seems clear that many people see the European Union as a prototype of how a global economic union of open borderless societies would function.

The problem IMO is that it doesn't allow the traditional Constitution based government that was established by the founding fathers to survive in its present form.

Hell...that was just a bunch of old white guys 200 years ago ...time to move on to bigger and better things.

The pejorative term 'racist' is passe...get ready for the new terms...nativist...xenophobe..America firster.
44 posted on 07/13/2005 7:15:04 AM PDT by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dat Mon

I prefer Xenophobe, since Xenophon was a great man and a brilliant leader.

If the Greeks had listened to him, they may not have ended up as slaves.


45 posted on 07/13/2005 7:30:08 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

If you are a Rushbot then anyone who speaks of an elitist plan to destroy the America of our forefathers, must be a kook because to argue the facts would be very disturbing indeed.


46 posted on 07/13/2005 7:41:57 AM PDT by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim
CFR: Building a North American Community: Report of the Independent Task Force on the Future of North America
47 posted on 07/13/2005 7:42:07 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has just let the cat out of the bag about what's really behind our trade agreements and security partnerships with the other North American countries. A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

Here is the link to the actual 59-page document in .pdf form:

Building a North American Community - Report of the Independent Task Force on the Future of North America

48 posted on 07/13/2005 7:45:48 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Final Authority

I've seldom seen a topic so resist discussion as this one.

To accept this as true, which it is, the Bushbots have to admit their world is a fantasy and their demigod ruler is a traitor, just like Kerry and Albore.

They'd rather run screaming from the room with their eyes shut tight and their hands over their ears.


49 posted on 07/13/2005 7:48:01 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Kewlhand`tek

See the links I posted above. This stuff is for REAL!


50 posted on 07/13/2005 7:49:56 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

See the links I posted above. Read on, MacDuff!


51 posted on 07/13/2005 7:51:40 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

I made a direct link to the public document above, so the ones who scream "tinfoil hatters" won't have any excuses....


52 posted on 07/13/2005 7:53:34 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Final Authority
No man or woman will ever be President without being vetted in advance by the CFR.

Makes you kind of wonder what the CFR thinks about Hillary. They were big on Bill....

53 posted on 07/13/2005 7:54:31 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace

Notice there is no concern on the part of the CFR that the next president may not go along with the plan, even though it's not scheduled for completion until 2010.

They know that the next one, whoever it is, will be one of them and not one of us.


54 posted on 07/13/2005 7:54:46 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace

They'll just hide and refuse to answer.


55 posted on 07/13/2005 7:55:27 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

"Just what is left in the Communist Manifesto that we haven't done yet? Property rights are gone, the queers are living high, guns are going, we are sharing all the latest hi-tech designs with our enemies, the Constitution is a wet rag today, we are supporting the Muslims as best we can, we're supporting everything the UN Charter says to. What more can us infidels do to kill freedom and individual liberty?"

I hope there will be at least a few of us that will fight to the end.


56 posted on 07/13/2005 8:11:16 AM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
They'll just hide and refuse to answer.

Apparently so. The crickets are now chirping....

57 posted on 07/13/2005 8:19:17 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: antisocial

How many fingers do you have? 10 I presume. 1 out of ten?

No, 10% of the American population is not now willing to fight for freedom and individual liberty. I don't think there ever will be because us old patriots are dying off a helluva lot faster than we're being replaced. The generation behind us think the dollar is more important than freedom. 80 some percent of FReepers think safety is more important than their individual freedoms.

(go back thru the FR polls and you'll get the actual number)


58 posted on 07/13/2005 8:19:54 AM PDT by B4Ranch ( Report every illegal alien that you meet. Call 866-347-2423, Employers use 888-464-4218)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace

Hillary won't make it past the primaries, IMO.


59 posted on 07/13/2005 8:21:19 AM PDT by B4Ranch ( Report every illegal alien that you meet. Call 866-347-2423, Employers use 888-464-4218)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

Considering the breeding rates of the various parties involved in this "integration" scheme, I'd estimate the North American continent will be fully Mexicanized by 2050, and the culture that founded and built the greastest nation in the history of the world will be all but extinguished.


60 posted on 07/13/2005 8:24:21 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson