Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CFR's Plan to Integrate US, Canada, Mexico (Americans Being Betrayed)
Eagle Forum ^ | July 13, 2005 | Phylls Schlafly

Posted on 07/13/2005 5:03:35 AM PDT by Lindykim

CFR's Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada by Phyllis Schlafly, July 13, 2005

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has just let the cat out of the bag about what's really behind our trade agreements and security partnerships with the other North American countries. A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

"Community" means integrating the United States with the corruption, socialism, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada. "Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada. "Community" is sometimes called "space" but the CFR goal is clear: "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely." The CFR's "integrated" strategy calls for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people."

The CFR document lays "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." The "common security perimeter" will require us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations" with Mexico and Canada, "harmonize entry screening," and "fully share data about the exit and entry of foreign nationals."

This CFR document, called "Building a North American Community," asserts that George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details. It was at this same meeting, grandly called the North American summit, that President Bush pinned the epithet "vigilantes" on the volunteers guarding our border in Arizona.

A follow-up meeting was held in Ottawa on June 27, where the U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, told a news conference that "we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders." The White House issued a statement that the Ottawa report "represents an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership."

The CFR document calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages.

Just to make sure that bringing cheap labor from Mexico is an essential part of the plan, the CFR document calls for "a seamless North American market" and for "the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico."

The document's frequent references to "security" are just a cover for the real objectives. The document's "security cooperation" includes the registration of ballistics and explosives, while Canada specifically refused to cooperate with our Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).

To no one's surprise, the CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico.

The experience of the European Union and the World Trade Organization makes it clear that a common market requires a court system, so the CFR document calls for "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution." Get ready for decisions from non-American judges who make up their rules ad hoc and probably hate the United States anyway.

The CFR document calls for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR document calls for adopting a "tested once" principle for pharmaceuticals, by which a product tested in Mexico will automatically be considered to have met U.S. standards.

The CFR document demands that we implement "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico." That's code language for putting illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, which is bound to bankrupt the system.

Here's another handout included in the plan. U.S. taxpayers are supposed to create a major fund to finance 60,000 Mexican students to study in U.S. colleges.

To ensure that the U.S. government carries out this plan so that it is "achievable" within five years, the CFR calls for supervision by a North American Advisory Council of "eminent persons from outside government . . . along the lines of the Bilderberg" conferences.

The best known Americans who participated in the CFR Task Force that wrote this document are former Massachusetts Governor William Weld and Bill Clinton's immigration chief Doris Meissner. Another participant, American University Professor Robert Pastor, presented the CFR plan at a friendly hearing of Senator Richard Lugar's Foreign Relations Committee on June 9.

Ask your Senators and Representatives which side they are on: the CFR's integrated North American Community or U.S. sovereignty guarded by our own borders.

Eagle Forum • PO Box 618 • Alton, IL 62002 • phone: 618-462-5415 • fax: 618-462-8909 • eagle@eagleforum.org Read this article online: http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: cfr; communismwins; crimeagainstamerica; enemywithin; lossofcountry; openborder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-183 next last
To: Mr. Mojo
"It'll be interesting to see how this 'North American Community' will recognize the individual right to keep and bear arms. As of right now the one-worlders/gun-grabbers have a big problem...more Americans than at any time in recent history are securing CCW licenses, fully aware of their 2nd Amendment rights.

...If [CFR type] they think they have a chance in hell of taking away our guns without suffering the consequences individually, their delusions would be dashed in short order."

It is only the 2nd Amendment standing squarely in the way of Globalism that will prevent this 'North American Community'from dismantling the U.S. Constitution in leiu of it's own.

Gonna be a very interesting next twenty-five years as elitist so-called "leaders" of both Parties further shred and undermine the Constitution and with it -- U.S. sovereignty -- as they usher in (drumroll please)-- their New World Order.

101 posted on 07/13/2005 10:30:10 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD
"Specifically, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, aka the Fourth Reich - is preparing for great war and global conquest while we twiddle our thumbs and dream of Starbucks in Xiamen."

Lol, well put...

102 posted on 07/13/2005 10:32:01 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
You said... "Is the NWO starting to unravel, or are things going to get much much worse?"

Maybe its my science background...but it seems that all inherently stable balanced systems sit at equilibrium...and can resist perturbations without going off into the weeds.

I maintain that the system our founding fathers set up was a stroke of genius...inherently stable...and able to survive turmoil.

A NWO globalist system IMO is an inherently UNSTABLE system.

Given a perturbation...of which islamo-fascism is certainly a BIG one...the system unravels...as it should...back into a regional based security system. The unraveling however, may be traumatic and catastrophic and the system may collapse into anarchy..or complete fascism.

It is all basically human nature and psychology driven.
103 posted on 07/13/2005 10:32:58 AM PDT by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
The Party is over. We're too late.

Exactly! It's only going to get worse.

104 posted on 07/13/2005 10:37:38 AM PDT by NRA2BFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9

You need to see what's happening in EU with regards to the oppostion the new constitution that was turned down by French and Netherland voters because they were informed enough to know that their national sovereignty was at risk if they approved the new EU version.

Also, I've read about numerous EU commissions that've been set up to supplant those from individual nations and in fact there was a good thread from 7/12 (Newsmax) "EU limits dietary supplements sales" that discussed how an EU court is trying to impose their rules on nations within the union regarding sales of vitamins, etc.


105 posted on 07/13/2005 10:38:13 AM PDT by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Designer
"The Illuminati was many years ago. "

Then why do they still have their eye on my money?

106 posted on 07/13/2005 10:38:33 AM PDT by bayourod (Winning elections is everything in a democracy. Losing is for people unclear on the concept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim

BTTT


107 posted on 07/13/2005 10:44:48 AM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Yo! Cowboy! I'm praying for a LoganMiracle! It CAN happen!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim

This is not new information to those who have done their homework and been paying attention.

It gets worse.


108 posted on 07/13/2005 10:45:12 AM PDT by Quix (GOD'S LOVE IS INCREDIBLE . . . BUT MUST BE RECEIVED TO . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
You said.. "It was actually a "free enterprise" system."

I remember now we had this discussion once before. ;0)

I use the terms interchangeably...maybe I shouldn't.
109 posted on 07/13/2005 10:46:26 AM PDT by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Sure smells like treason to me.


U.S. Constitution Article 4 Section 4:

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,

and shall protect each of them against Invasion;"


Invasion: \In*va"sion\, n. [L. invasio: cf. F. invasion. See Invade.] [1913 Webster]

1. The act of invading; the act of encroaching upon the rights or possessions of another; encroachment; trespass.

110 posted on 07/13/2005 10:47:36 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim

No amount of tea party will overcome the tryannical globalists.

Scripture is clear that the evil world government will reign for 3.5-7 years.

Only Christ's overt triumphant return to defeat the enemy and his forces at Armageddon will deliver the earth from utter destruction.


111 posted on 07/13/2005 10:48:20 AM PDT by Quix (GOD'S LOVE IS INCREDIBLE . . . BUT MUST BE RECEIVED TO . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

I actually wrote "Rushbot" as in Limbaugh.


112 posted on 07/13/2005 10:49:55 AM PDT by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Tancredo has yet to attempt to be President so how can you write he has been kept out? There is a reason why the two party system is well defended by the status quo types and that is so whoever wins they have the blessings of the elite.

The CFR is anything but liberal, it is elite, it is of the rich and the influential, it is not of the average working class hero that has made America great.


113 posted on 07/13/2005 10:54:09 AM PDT by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim
"Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

How is this different than what is going on right now?

I could understand a totally open border with Canada, if they were more careful about who they let fly into Canada, because it would reduce the size of the border we have to patrol, which could free up resources for elsewhere (i.e. Mexico). Jokes about Canada being the 51st state aside, they speak the same language (except that one portion that holds onto French, and hey, we have Louisiana as well ;-) ), there isn't a mass movement coming to work for cheap here in the US, etc. We have a lot in common, especially in regards to security.

Mexico on the other hand, hell no. They have no idea who comes into their country, they are such a poor and corrupt society, they practically encourage illegal emmigration to the US (through absentee voting, etc.), and well, we've seen what's been going on in Nuevo Laredo.

One thing I do worry about, is going beyond simple open borders, into a more complex integration. It just doesn't work. Didn't work for the Soviets, for the EU, etc. It just won't.
114 posted on 07/13/2005 10:58:03 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alabama MOM; lacylu; Velveeta; Calpernia; familyop; DAVEY CROCKETT; MamaDearest; Domestic Church; ..

Ping


115 posted on 07/13/2005 10:58:09 AM PDT by nw_arizona_granny (http://bernie.house.gov/pc/members.asp Meet YOUR Communist party members in Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
It just won't.

If we don't do something now, then we are going to find out first hand how it doesn't work.
116 posted on 07/13/2005 11:02:24 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
"Just what is left in the Communist Manifesto that we haven't done yet? Property rights are gone, the queers are living high, guns are going, we are sharing all the latest hi-tech designs with our enemies, the Constitution is a wet rag today, we are supporting the Muslims as best we can, we're supporting everything the UN Charter says to. What more can us infidels do to kill freedom and individual liberty?"

Nicely and accurately summarized.

Perhaps our Washington crapweasels deserve another raise for doing such a great job protecting and defending American sovereignty...

117 posted on 07/13/2005 11:19:21 AM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

Looks intersting. I just ordered a copy.


118 posted on 07/13/2005 11:26:39 AM PDT by planekT (The Supreme Can of Worms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Dat Mon

It's the age old problem of "too much democracy" - our Founding Fathers understood this - they were top tier, upper percentile thinkers. Democratic mob rule leads to people voting themselves maximal benes. Eventually, foreign influence gets involved and it's hogs to the feeding trough. Once things sink to that level either one of two things will happen - either a strong man rises up (the Caesardom model) or another great power comes in and conquers. My own bet is on the latter.


119 posted on 07/13/2005 12:59:42 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

Sadly ... :(


120 posted on 07/13/2005 1:00:20 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson