Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush White House Is Nicer To Enemies Than It Is Loyal To Its Friends (Rush)
RushLimbaugh.com ^ | 7/12/05 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 07/12/2005 6:04:01 PM PDT by NeoCaveman

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

There was a breakfast meeting at the White House today, and the president came out and discussed it. His meeting was with -- Let's see, who did he meet? -- Arlen Specter, Harry Reid, Patrick Leahy and Bill Frist. Yeah. So he met with Specter, Leahy, Frist and Senator Harry Reid about the current vacancy and what might be an up-coming one.

Just to set this up: last week, the president sort of smacked down some conservatives for daring to suggest that the attorney general, Alberto Gonzales, would be an unacceptable Supreme Court nominee because of substantive issues. One was an opinion he wrote in a Texas parental-notification case when he was on the Texas Supreme Court, and the other was his role as White House counsel in watering down the administration's brief against reverse discrimination in admissions policies at the University of Michigan.

Now, the conservatives didn't attack Gonzales personally; they were very respectful, but they nevertheless said publicly they had problems with him, and the president slapped them down -- and today has a meeting with his enemies, along with Frist and Specter. I don't even know that you'd call Specter a friend in this fight, and it just seems that on occasion the administration here is far more friendly to its enemies than it is to its friends. It does appear that way. I don't know why he's meeting with these people. It's not going to change what the Democrats say about him. It's not going to change how they act in the Senate. It's not going to change a thing -- unless, of course, they gave him a list of names and he names one of them, in which case, you know... I can't imagine that. So we'll just have to wait and see, but we do have these audio sound bites. There's some public opinion out there that does not look good for the Democrats, and you'd think the administration could capitalize on it.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; appeasement; bigstick; bush; gonzales; gonzalez; rush; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: technomage

There you've got it - like so many have forgotten. WE employ THEM. WE are the BOSSES of these cretins, not their subjects.

It's high time that the public remembers that little known fact, and starts putting it to use.


41 posted on 07/12/2005 6:27:20 PM PDT by datura (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sport
Why haven't the Senate Republicans been informed that we are winning?

Well now, that is the question, isn't it?

Again, that is why I am anti-incumbent when it comes to the Senate. Vote out the spineless conservatives in the Senate, vote in new conservatives that actually have an idea how to lead!

42 posted on 07/12/2005 6:28:19 PM PDT by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: hgro
Keep your friends close, Keep your enemies closer is true in this case as it is in any other.
So you think Specter is a friend to the party and the President?
43 posted on 07/12/2005 6:28:23 PM PDT by lewislynn ( Is calling for energy independence a "protectionist" act?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Worse yet, Ol' Sparky, what will happen to the WOT? Bush has done so much to contradict his stand on that, most notably his open borders advocacy.

His recent White House guests have been detrimental to our position in the WOT.

What does that mean to me? It means that our troops are left in the lurch and facing the consequences of wishy-washy politics.


44 posted on 07/12/2005 6:29:26 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (Remembering our Heroes today and every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: datura
It's high time that the public remembers that little known fact, and starts putting it to use.

Actually, I believe more and more of the peeples know this. The bigger problem is the Republicans in the Senate are still acting like they are in the minority, probably because so many of them have been there way to long and have no idea how to act like winners and leaders.

45 posted on 07/12/2005 6:30:33 PM PDT by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

Specter couldn't pass a simple situational awareness test - he's beyond senile.

We've got Senators that qualify for seconds in some Hollywood zombie movie - that need removal - yet their constituents keep sending the b@stards back due to the pork they get into the budget.


46 posted on 07/12/2005 6:31:29 PM PDT by datura (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: datura
We've got Senators that qualify for seconds in some Hollywood zombie movie - that need removal - yet their constituents keep sending the b@stards back due to the pork they get into the budget.

We would have gotten rid of Specter in 2004 primary if it hadn't been for outside interference.....(you know who's)

47 posted on 07/12/2005 6:34:59 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (we should not hesitate to resolve the tension in favor of the Constitution's original meaning-Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: technomage

Part of the problem as well is the rules of the Senate. They get so damned involved with the Senate Rules that they forget their oath of office. Combine that with the way they insulate themselves from the very laws they create, and you've got a tyranny on your hands.

They need to see the masses marching on the senate with torches and pitchforks, along with some tar and feathers. Like the "old days". Some public "attitude adjustment" is well past due. Their ego is out of control.


48 posted on 07/12/2005 6:35:23 PM PDT by datura (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Specter is no friend and Frist is limp wrist pantie waist idiot.
49 posted on 07/12/2005 6:37:07 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Yeah, I know.

But look at cases like Byrd. (I know he's not one of ours, but then again I don't think any of them in that chamber are actually conservatives.)


50 posted on 07/12/2005 6:37:32 PM PDT by datura (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67
you also seem to forget that RWR use to have Tip O neil to the WH all the time.
For good reason. Tip O'Neill wasn't just a Congressman, he was Speaker Of The House...
51 posted on 07/12/2005 6:37:49 PM PDT by lewislynn ( Is calling for energy independence a "protectionist" act?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: datura
I don't think any of them in that chamber are actually conservatives.)

Tom Coburn IS and Jim DeMint probably is.

52 posted on 07/12/2005 6:39:32 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (we should not hesitate to resolve the tension in favor of the Constitution's original meaning-Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

Better Tip O'Niel than Yasser Arafat - as Clinton so often did.


53 posted on 07/12/2005 6:39:49 PM PDT by datura (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant
Don't mention third party here, the lockstep pubs go into a dither and stop breathing.
54 posted on 07/12/2005 6:40:09 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident; datura
We would have gotten rid of Specter in 2004 primary if it hadn't been for outside interference.....(you know who's)
His "friend" in the White House?
55 posted on 07/12/2005 6:41:22 PM PDT by lewislynn ( Is calling for energy independence a "protectionist" act?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
I am a huge GW supporter. I think overall he has been a great President. But,... when it comes to the border, and 41 consorting with Bubba, I am at a loss to explain what is going on. I just don't get it.
56 posted on 07/12/2005 6:45:51 PM PDT by rodguy911 (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU and all Mosques in the US,UK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

Absolutely the best way to put the Dems back in control.


57 posted on 07/12/2005 6:47:58 PM PDT by mn-bush-man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant
I voted for a party that would implement conservative values, and do so without scurrilous behavior. I'm not a happy camper. Can anyone say "Third Party", little boys and girls?

Third Party = President H.R. Clinton - it makes frustrated people feel better, but is not a realistic option in our system.

I noticed that the Dems are not complaining too loudly over the idea of Gonzalez as a possible Supreme. They'll agree to support him for an O'Connor part of a "compromise", then push for a "consensus" candidate top replace Renquist. The Repub. senators better be prepared to resist.

58 posted on 07/12/2005 6:48:57 PM PDT by podkane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn; All

I think the frustration involved with this thread is due to a large number of issues that the administration has conveniently betrayed the right on.

1. The border. 'nuff said.
2. Campaign finance reform.
3. Lack of comments regarding imminent domain most recently.
4. Failure to prosecute obvious treason by the 'toons, and others since.
5. Foreign policy that has shifted back to helping the frickin UN and bending over backwards for the EU, Mexico, and especially China.

We on the right played a big part in getting this president elected - twice - and our repayment has been betrayal. That's the root cause of all this. We've been suckered - we actually fell for the good old American way of thinking.

We thought it was going to be as we believe America should be, not as it was. Some wake up call this second term has been.......


59 posted on 07/12/2005 6:49:30 PM PDT by datura (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
I ain't happy right now either.
You may have a lot of company.

Am I the only one who's noticed it's taking an exceptionally long time to meet the "Freepathon" goal?

60 posted on 07/12/2005 6:50:00 PM PDT by lewislynn ( Is calling for energy independence a "protectionist" act?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson