[livius]

Remind me why I bothered to work for Bush's reelection.

[Question Liberal Authority]

Would it help if I leaked a list of John Kerry nominees to the Supreme Court?

[Pukin Dog]

Read carefully next time. It does NOT say that BUSH floated names. The Dems floated THEIR names. Bush would never tell them up front. Not a chance.

[Redleg Duke]

So you could whimper and whine, like you are doing now.

[WoodstockCat]

has he given a name yet? hold your fire till the name is given.
He should say that he worked harder than ever to find a nominee that would pass Democratic muster but he couldn't find one that also fit the mold of Scalia and Thomas.
That is what he promised and until he breaks it by nominating someone outside of that mold, hold your fire.

[LongsforReagan]

Because he's a fiscal conservative.

Oooops, I mean....

[Iron Matron]

both of whom are Hispanic....

Bush will "SUpreme Court" us right into the Union of the Americas.

I'll oppose any pro-illegal Supreme Court Justice. I imagine a Hispanic that Bush picks WILL be pro-illegal (Amnesty, Trade, etc.)

[Trust but Verify]

Did you read the article? Nowhere does it say that those are the names Bush put forward. I heard the opposite on the radio on the way home from work, and this story suggests that those names were put forth by the Democrats. Someone is trying to pull something with this headline.

Also, for the record, Sotomayor and Prado were both Reagan appointees.

[Miss Marple]

If you will read the article, rather than the misleading headline, you will see that these are people the Rats find acceptable and released to the press. The President gave them no names.

[AmishDude]

(a) Newsmax story.

(b) Title relates not at all to story.

[Lowell]

They promised to keep their discussions confidential! my A$$.

[yellowdoghunter]

Remind me why I bothered to work for Bush's reelection.

Get ready to be lectured by those who think they are wiser and smarter than you...:) Please know that MOST Freepers WILL not lecture you...... And please, people, I am a life-long Republican, NEVER voted for a Democrat in my life....so I do not need any lectures.

[Soul Seeker]

As soon as you remind why Bush earned that comment.

I see nothing to suggest Bush has compromised his promises.

[Indy Pendance]

Because you didn't read the article? It's a dem wish list.

[SunStar]

Remind me why I bothered to work for Bush's reelection.

Calm down...

Bush "didn't give us any names," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said after the session had broken up.

[rabidralph]

Don't worry, you don't have to work on his campaign, ever again.

[justshutupandtakeit]

Because you were sane at the time.

[theDentist]

Remind me why I bothered to work for Bush's reelection.

Because if Kerry was Pres, you'd be enrolled in a PEST group therapy session 3 days a week, at about $100 a pop.

[okie01]

Remind me why I bothered to work for Bush's reelection.

The headline is misleading. Turns out the two names were names floated by the Democrats. Bush didn't reveal his list to them.

[CROSSHIGHWAYMAN]

Remind me why I bothered to work for Bush's reelection.

For the safety of your family and sane economic policy.

[Vigilanteman]

Remind me how closely Clinton consulted with Republican Senators before selecting Beyer and ACLU lackey Ginsberg.