Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/12/2005 1:27:48 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CHARLITE

The sound of air coming out of a shakedown.


2 posted on 07/12/2005 1:32:03 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Scratch a Liberal. Uncover a Fascist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
Attorneys retained by nine of the women had tried to keep the names of their clients a secret for a host of reasons, one of which was fear of a deteriorating bipolar condition brought on by intense media scrutiny.

You have got to be kidding me! Am I reading that correctly? Are these attorneys really arguing that the media causes a mental disorder?

3 posted on 07/12/2005 1:34:24 PM PDT by Antonello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
The Left Coast Report finds it curious that the allegations against Cos seemed to hit just after he spoke out against the so-called black leadership, offered some sound parental advice and told teens to clean up their language.

Very curious indeed!

4 posted on 07/12/2005 1:35:50 PM PDT by Irish_Thatcherite (Terrorism is the modern name we give barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

These libs are so transparent.


6 posted on 07/12/2005 1:37:59 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Cos needn't worry. Multiple allegations of boorish behavior towards women only made bill clinton more popular.


8 posted on 07/12/2005 1:45:21 PM PDT by somemoreequalthanothers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Sounds like Sharpton and Jack-ass put out 'da booty-call on on Mr. Bill. Nothing is below these scumbags when it comes to 'maintainin 'da Plantation.


9 posted on 07/12/2005 1:49:40 PM PDT by johnny7 (“'Deservin ain't got 'nothin to do with it!” -Will Money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Why not have secret accusers?
It worked so well in the Soviet Union.


11 posted on 07/12/2005 2:00:10 PM PDT by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
The judge wrote that the "allegations of harm by each of the Jane Doe witnesses are unsubstantiated broad allegations."

Made by an unsubstantiated broad?

12 posted on 07/12/2005 2:00:54 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Let Cosby have his constitutional right to confront his accusers. If he is denied it, he has good grounds to appeal.


16 posted on 07/12/2005 2:23:45 PM PDT by MinstrelBoy (Calculus: The Fear of All Sums!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

People who issue accusations that are not proven to be true beyond any reasonable doubt should receive the same punishment that the accused would otherwise receive. ...no excuses and no tolerance for false allegations, and make any legislation that passes for such laws retroactive against all accusers, court officers, judges (no immunities), social workers,...


18 posted on 07/12/2005 2:59:14 PM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson