1 posted on
07/12/2005 1:27:48 PM PDT by
CHARLITE
To: CHARLITE
The sound of air coming out of a shakedown.
2 posted on
07/12/2005 1:32:03 PM PDT by
Eric in the Ozarks
(Scratch a Liberal. Uncover a Fascist)
To: CHARLITE
Attorneys retained by nine of the women had tried to keep the names of their clients a secret for a host of reasons, one of which was fear of a deteriorating bipolar condition brought on by intense media scrutiny.You have got to be kidding me! Am I reading that correctly? Are these attorneys really arguing that the media causes a mental disorder?
3 posted on
07/12/2005 1:34:24 PM PDT by
Antonello
To: CHARLITE
The Left Coast Report finds it curious that the allegations against Cos seemed to hit just after he spoke out against the so-called black leadership, offered some sound parental advice and told teens to clean up their language. Very curious indeed!
4 posted on
07/12/2005 1:35:50 PM PDT by
Irish_Thatcherite
(Terrorism is the modern name we give barbarism.)
To: CHARLITE
These libs are so transparent.
6 posted on
07/12/2005 1:37:59 PM PDT by
TBP
To: CHARLITE
Cos needn't worry. Multiple allegations of boorish behavior towards women only made bill clinton more popular.
To: CHARLITE
Sounds like Sharpton and Jack-ass put out 'da booty-call on on Mr. Bill. Nothing is below these scumbags when it comes to 'maintainin 'da Plantation.
9 posted on
07/12/2005 1:49:40 PM PDT by
johnny7
(“'Deservin ain't got 'nothin to do with it!” -Will Money)
To: CHARLITE
Why not have secret accusers?
It worked so well in the Soviet Union.
To: CHARLITE
The judge wrote that the "allegations of harm by each of the Jane Doe witnesses are unsubstantiated broad allegations." Made by an unsubstantiated broad?
12 posted on
07/12/2005 2:00:54 PM PDT by
Corin Stormhands
(Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
To: CHARLITE
Let Cosby have his constitutional right to confront his accusers. If he is denied it, he has good grounds to appeal.
16 posted on
07/12/2005 2:23:45 PM PDT by
MinstrelBoy
(Calculus: The Fear of All Sums!)
To: CHARLITE
People who issue accusations that are not proven to be true beyond any reasonable doubt should receive the same punishment that the accused would otherwise receive. ...no excuses and no tolerance for false allegations, and make any legislation that passes for such laws retroactive against all accusers, court officers, judges (no immunities), social workers,...
18 posted on
07/12/2005 2:59:14 PM PDT by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson