Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Good to review
1 posted on 07/11/2005 11:33:13 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: eyespysomething

ping


2 posted on 07/11/2005 11:40:10 AM PDT by SittinYonder (America is the Last Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

You know, at least seven of the above ten principles speak to why libertarians are not conservatives.


3 posted on 07/11/2005 11:41:01 AM PDT by My2Cents (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati [When all else fails, play dead])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I've heard of the late Russell Kirk being one of the fathers of the conservative movement but you don't hear his name bandied about much anymore. I agree with him that conservatives are (or should be) more in tune with "permament things" rather than chaos but that is exactly what we have these days. I prefer the term "moral agnosticism" to describe this state of affairs. I define this as a marked inability and also a lack of desire to come to ultimate moral conclusions about things, abortion being the most obvious example. There are also the "philosophical constructs" constantly being used by the Left, such as the fetus may be human but isn't a person or that the late Terri Schiavo was not even human but merely a vegetable who could be dehydrated to death. Philosophical constructs one and all, as they have no basis in biological reality whatsover.


4 posted on 07/11/2005 11:42:11 AM PDT by drama queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
I'll tell you what a conservative is. A conservative is someone who:

1. Opposes admission of Red China to the U.N.
2. Opposes giving away the Panama Canal
3. Opposes forced busing
4. Opposes fluoridation of drinking water
5. Supports the death penalty
6. Opposes unilateral disarmament, and
7. Supports a return to the gold standard.

5 posted on 07/11/2005 11:43:45 AM PDT by bayourod (Winning elections is everything in a democracy. Losing is for people unclear on the concept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Goth teens spend an awful lot of time sitting around defining themselves too.


7 posted on 07/11/2005 11:49:15 AM PDT by biblewonk (If you don't get the bible, how can you be a Christian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Excellent and well reasoned points. I find myself in agreement with almost all of them.


8 posted on 07/11/2005 11:51:55 AM PDT by Alexander Rubin (You make my heart glad by building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

bttt


10 posted on 07/11/2005 11:55:57 AM PDT by goonie4life9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
Of course he ignored compeletely the most bogus conservative principle.

Prohibition Works!

13 posted on 07/11/2005 12:15:49 PM PDT by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

ping for later


14 posted on 07/11/2005 12:27:10 PM PDT by mnehring (If you don't root for the team, get out of the stadium.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I would suggest reading this fine speech:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/daily/may98/goldwaterspeech.htm


15 posted on 07/11/2005 12:37:42 PM PDT by Barry Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CyberCowboy777; Baynative; Libertina; cmsgop

Check this out. Perhaps worthy of a WA state ping?


16 posted on 07/11/2005 12:47:01 PM PDT by SW6906
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
Some years ago I posted a Calvin Biesner review of the Politics of Prudence, one chapter of which was a restatment of his life long theme of gathering these in a well stated form. You can see that old thread HERE to read comments at that time.

Kirk has been talked about here many times over the years. His denouncment of Ideology was the first article I posted many years ago.

Kirk was the champion of tradional small "c" conservatism and while not making his name battling libertarianism, he was opposed to ideological libertaians like the Objectivists.

If we had to name two people that gave a rebirth and a firm defination to conservatism in the early 50s for Goldwater, Buckley and Reagan to spring from, it would be Russell Kirk and Richard Weaver.

17 posted on 07/11/2005 12:52:15 PM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

#4 Says that Prudence is the greatest virtue. I don't think a single virtue stands on it's own but I would rank honesty higher than prudence.


21 posted on 07/11/2005 2:02:12 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
I knew the second I saw the title to this thread that it had to come from Russell Kirk. He is the Moses of Conservatism. The Conservative Mind comprises the catechism of our cause, and his other works are ancillary gospels.
22 posted on 07/11/2005 2:42:41 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson