Posted on 07/10/2005 8:12:19 AM PDT by Our_Man_In_Gough_Island
Conqueror of Everest Sir Edmund Hillary has urged world governments to protect the Himalayas from climate change.
The World Heritage Committee, which supervises protection of sites of special interest, meets this week.
Environmental campaigners, backed by Sir Edmund, want the committee to put the Sagarmatha National Park in the Himalayas on its danger list.
This would mean governments are legally bound to protect it - which, they say, means cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
In May 1953 Sir Edmund Hillary joined forces with Sherpa Tenzing Norgay on the first successful ascent of the world's highest mountain.
'Severe floods'
Ever since, he has devoted much time to projects which help the peoples of the Himalayas.
It is more than 50 years since Hillary and Tenzing made the ascent Now, a few days short of his 86th birthday, he is turning his attention to climate change.
"The warming of the environment of the Himalayas has increased noticeably over the last 50 years," he wrote in a statement sent to the BBC.
"This has caused several and severe floods from glacial lakes and much disruption to the environment and local people."
In 1985, the Dig Tsho glacial lake burst its banks, releasing a mountainside deluge which rushed through villages, bringing down 14 bridges.
'Thousands at risk'
Three years ago, a study by the United Nations Environment Programme (Unep) and the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (Icimod) found more than 40 glacial lakes were filling so rapidly that a similar outburst was likely.
Tens of thousands of lives were at risk, it concluded, with Unep's Executive Director Klaus Toepfer describing the situation as "another compelling reason to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases".
Mount Everest could make the danger list Petitions before Unesco's World Heritage Committee this week as it meets in Durban, South Africa, are seeking to force action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Every year the committee can decide whether to award places of special natural, archaeological or cultural interest the status of a World Heritage Site, and whether to add any of those sites to its "danger list".
By ratifying the World Heritage Convention, nations acknowledge that "such heritage constitutes a world heritage for whose protection it is the duty of the international community as a whole to co-operate".
They also undertake to ensure that World Heritage Sites are kept fit for future generations, and "not to take any deliberate measures which might damage directly or indirectly the cultural and natural heritage".
Protective measures
Environmental campaigners are saying that the 180 nations which have ratified the World Heritage Convention have a legal duty to protect Sagarmatha, as well as Huascaran National Park in Peru and the Belize Barrier Reef, from the impacts of climate change.
"Firstly, we will be asking the World Heritage Committee to look carefully at the petitions and urging it to add the sites to the danger list," Peter Roderick - the Director of Climate Justice, the organisation coordinating the petitions - told BBC News.
"This will ensure that they receive the higher level of protection they urgently need, such as assessing and making safe glacial lakes in the Himalayas and the Andes.
"Secondly, we want the committee to review compliance with the parties' duty under the World Heritage Convention to transmit World Heritage Sites to future generations. Plainly, without drastic cuts in greenhouse gas emissions, this legal obligation will not be met."
It is not clear how much support Climate Justice has among governments represented on the World Heritage Committee.
The British government did not respond to a BBC request to make its position known.
But the view of the first man to stand on the roof of the world is unequivocal.
"I support the petition to the Unesco World Heritage Committee... requesting the inclusion of Sagarmatha National Park in the list of World Heritage in Danger as a result of climate change and for protective measures and action."
Let's not get over delusional about the importance of the worldly views of an aging rock climber.
Personally, I think the public would be much better served if they just razed the Himalyas and replaced them with a shopping mall.
Think of all the jobs a project like that would create, and all the tax revenue it would generate!
Oh Please! He's a rock climber that was the first to litter the hell out of Mt. Everest with oxygen bottles. Hillary has the same enviormental knowledge as the eviromentalist do, with is little to none outside of tree hugging!
Amazing, and to think that he was named after the first lady.
Huh!!!
This guy also sits on the board of Grand Circle Travel and endorses that travel company exclusively. Do you use that travel company just because he says you should?
Seems you are swayed by notoriety. Does he have any scientific credentials to make this assessment. Probably the same as Brad Pitt.
Just because this guy climbs mountains it does not make him an expert on climate trends.
sniff, sniff...
Another useful idiot brought to the fore.
Maybe Sir Edmund should look at this online video:
*Climate Experts Speak Out in New Video - Science underlying Kyoto Protocol seriously flawed*
OTTAWA, April 13 /CNW Telbec/ - Today, researchers at the University of Calgary, in cooperation with the Friends of Science Society, released a video entitled:
*/Climate Catastrophe Cancelled: What you're not being told about the science of climate change/*
23 minute video:
http://www.friendsofscience.org/index.php?ide=3
How old is he?
"In 1985, the Dig Tsho glacial lake burst its banks, releasing a mountainside deluge which rushed through villages, bringing down 14 bridges."
This seems presumptive to me.....because "glaciers" are ice, by definition and fact. So please tell me how ice forms without first having been water at more than 32 degrees F?
Hillary wants to go out with a bang, and what better bang than making noise about what he likely considers his personal monument to his magnum opus and claim to fame?
ALL of that glacial ice he climbed over so amny years ago had been water long before he ever got there, and it is destined to become water again....some now, and some long after he is gone.
So9
Edmund Hillary was named after Laura Bush?
His is not the only "big" name behind this, but like most of them, they haven't a CLUE as to what the REAL science says.
I love the reactions from students when I tell them- there IS NO hole in the ozone; there is NO global warming caused by man; less than one percent over one hundred years is NO reason to get hysterical; yes, some glaciers are shrinking in size- but MORE are INCREASING; the Antarctic ice sheet has GROWN by 8 feet...
We are "fleas on the dog".
But hell- ain't no money in that, now is there?
It's hard to determine who is the bigger fool: you or Hillary.
I didn't know he was still alive. However, I just read that he was born in 1919.
What they could do is send B52s over the Himalayas with bomb bays full of ice cubes. They they could just let her rip.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.